Good off-roading video
12-03-2004, 11:52 AM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Couldn't remember the actual numbers....but more than there shoulda been, no
doubt!
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:41B081DD.6D961BF1@sympatico.ca...
> 2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
> publicity.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> SteveBrady wrote:
>>
>> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>>
>> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and
>> 600
>> or so got sick.
>> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
>> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
>> environment.
>>
>> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
>> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're
>> now
>> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>>
>> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're
>> putting
>> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we
>> should
>> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>>
>> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
>> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>> >
>> >
>> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
>> > well
>> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
>> > from
>> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
>> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
>> > stampedes of animals.
>> >
>> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
>> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
>> > -------- and pandering.
>> >
doubt!
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:41B081DD.6D961BF1@sympatico.ca...
> 2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
> publicity.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> SteveBrady wrote:
>>
>> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>>
>> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and
>> 600
>> or so got sick.
>> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
>> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
>> environment.
>>
>> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
>> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're
>> now
>> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>>
>> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're
>> putting
>> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we
>> should
>> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>>
>> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
>> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>> >
>> >
>> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
>> > well
>> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
>> > from
>> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
>> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
>> > stampedes of animals.
>> >
>> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
>> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
>> > -------- and pandering.
>> >
12-03-2004, 11:52 AM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Couldn't remember the actual numbers....but more than there shoulda been, no
doubt!
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:41B081DD.6D961BF1@sympatico.ca...
> 2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
> publicity.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> SteveBrady wrote:
>>
>> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>>
>> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and
>> 600
>> or so got sick.
>> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
>> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
>> environment.
>>
>> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
>> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're
>> now
>> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>>
>> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're
>> putting
>> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we
>> should
>> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>>
>> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
>> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>> >
>> >
>> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
>> > well
>> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
>> > from
>> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
>> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
>> > stampedes of animals.
>> >
>> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
>> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
>> > -------- and pandering.
>> >
doubt!
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:41B081DD.6D961BF1@sympatico.ca...
> 2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
> publicity.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> SteveBrady wrote:
>>
>> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>>
>> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and
>> 600
>> or so got sick.
>> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
>> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
>> environment.
>>
>> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
>> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're
>> now
>> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>>
>> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're
>> putting
>> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we
>> should
>> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>>
>> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
>> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>> >
>> >
>> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
>> > well
>> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
>> > from
>> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
>> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
>> > stampedes of animals.
>> >
>> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
>> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
>> > -------- and pandering.
>> >
12-03-2004, 11:52 AM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Couldn't remember the actual numbers....but more than there shoulda been, no
doubt!
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:41B081DD.6D961BF1@sympatico.ca...
> 2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
> publicity.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> SteveBrady wrote:
>>
>> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>>
>> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and
>> 600
>> or so got sick.
>> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
>> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
>> environment.
>>
>> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
>> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're
>> now
>> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>>
>> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're
>> putting
>> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we
>> should
>> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>>
>> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
>> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>> >
>> >
>> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
>> > well
>> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
>> > from
>> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
>> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
>> > stampedes of animals.
>> >
>> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
>> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
>> > -------- and pandering.
>> >
doubt!
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:41B081DD.6D961BF1@sympatico.ca...
> 2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
> publicity.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> SteveBrady wrote:
>>
>> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>>
>> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and
>> 600
>> or so got sick.
>> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
>> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
>> environment.
>>
>> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
>> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're
>> now
>> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>>
>> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're
>> putting
>> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we
>> should
>> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>>
>> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
>> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>> >
>> >
>> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
>> > well
>> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
>> > from
>> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
>> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
>> > stampedes of animals.
>> >
>> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
>> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
>> > -------- and pandering.
>> >
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepadmin
Jeep News
0
11-04-2007 06:38 PM
st. nate
Trail Rides, Meetings & Events
3
05-29-2007 09:29 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)