Good off-roading video
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
or so got sick.
Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
environment.
That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
"wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
>
> Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> well
> ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> from
> a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> stampedes of animals.
>
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
or so got sick.
Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
environment.
That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
"wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
>> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
>> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
>
> Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> well
> ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> from
> a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> stampedes of animals.
>
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Great video, especially the end with the kids, made me a little misty...
In article <sut0r0t0tv1jjotacmmjcr98515sajrsr6@4ax.com>,
DragonRider <DragonRider1@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:02 -0700, "Kevin S"
> <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >
> >http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
> Excellent video and great points are made. Thank you for sharing it.
> :)
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|???L --O|||||||O-
()_)?()_) ????? )_)
In article <sut0r0t0tv1jjotacmmjcr98515sajrsr6@4ax.com>,
DragonRider <DragonRider1@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:02 -0700, "Kevin S"
> <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >
> >http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
> Excellent video and great points are made. Thank you for sharing it.
> :)
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|???L --O|||||||O-
()_)?()_) ????? )_)
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Great video, especially the end with the kids, made me a little misty...
In article <sut0r0t0tv1jjotacmmjcr98515sajrsr6@4ax.com>,
DragonRider <DragonRider1@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:02 -0700, "Kevin S"
> <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >
> >http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
> Excellent video and great points are made. Thank you for sharing it.
> :)
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|???L --O|||||||O-
()_)?()_) ????? )_)
In article <sut0r0t0tv1jjotacmmjcr98515sajrsr6@4ax.com>,
DragonRider <DragonRider1@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:02 -0700, "Kevin S"
> <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >
> >http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
> Excellent video and great points are made. Thank you for sharing it.
> :)
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|???L --O|||||||O-
()_)?()_) ????? )_)
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
Great video, especially the end with the kids, made me a little misty...
In article <sut0r0t0tv1jjotacmmjcr98515sajrsr6@4ax.com>,
DragonRider <DragonRider1@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:02 -0700, "Kevin S"
> <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >
> >http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
> Excellent video and great points are made. Thank you for sharing it.
> :)
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|???L --O|||||||O-
()_)?()_) ????? )_)
In article <sut0r0t0tv1jjotacmmjcr98515sajrsr6@4ax.com>,
DragonRider <DragonRider1@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:02 -0700, "Kevin S"
> <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >
> >http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
>
> Excellent video and great points are made. Thank you for sharing it.
> :)
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|???L --O|||||||O-
()_)?()_) ????? )_)
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
publicity.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SteveBrady wrote:
>
> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>
> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
> or so got sick.
> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
> environment.
>
> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>
> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
> >
> >
> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> > well
> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> > from
> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> > stampedes of animals.
> >
> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> > -------- and pandering.
> >
publicity.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SteveBrady wrote:
>
> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>
> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
> or so got sick.
> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
> environment.
>
> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>
> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
> >
> >
> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> > well
> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> > from
> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> > stampedes of animals.
> >
> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> > -------- and pandering.
> >
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
publicity.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SteveBrady wrote:
>
> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>
> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
> or so got sick.
> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
> environment.
>
> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>
> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
> >
> >
> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> > well
> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> > from
> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> > stampedes of animals.
> >
> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> > -------- and pandering.
> >
publicity.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SteveBrady wrote:
>
> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>
> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
> or so got sick.
> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
> environment.
>
> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>
> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
> >
> >
> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> > well
> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> > from
> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> > stampedes of animals.
> >
> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> > -------- and pandering.
> >
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
2300 seriously sick there and seven dead and a town ruined by bad
publicity.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SteveBrady wrote:
>
> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>
> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
> or so got sick.
> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
> environment.
>
> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>
> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
> >
> >
> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> > well
> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> > from
> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> > stampedes of animals.
> >
> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> > -------- and pandering.
> >
publicity.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SteveBrady wrote:
>
> Heard of Walkerton, Ontario?
>
> Cow/Bull ---- polluted local drinking water and killed a dozen ppl and 600
> or so got sick.
> Granted, the guys looking after the water system were negligent....but
> nonetheless, cows shitting in streams EN MASSE is NOT good for the
> environment.
>
> That much ---- in the water can wreck the streams breading habitat for a
> season. Ok...only one season, but they cross it every year. So they're now
> up there as far as pollutant contributors killing the environment.
>
> Both sides are guilty to a degree....but lets be sure that if we're putting
> restrictions on the side that doesn't offer up mass profits, then we should
> put restrictions on the ones that are $$-makers.
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MbCdnSUNjaQr_C3cRVn-uw@speakeasy.net...
> > From: "Kevin S" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
> >> Borrowed this link from another board I read.
> >> http://www.bigcountryoff-road.com/Past%20Events/adg.wmv
> >
> >
> > Animals crossing streams don't leave hydrocarbon pollutants. Cows may
> > well
> > ---- in the streams but it's bio-mass and will naturally degrade. Oil
> > from
> > a transfer case won't. Nor will the oils from the tires and the like.
> > Likewise the run off caused by trails is considerably worse than even
> > stampedes of animals.
> >
> > While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> > -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> > -------- and pandering.
> >
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
I think we are talking about reasonable uses. I doubt anyone here drives up
and down streams for the hell of it, or plans to change the tranny fluid in
the middle of the river. This may be a collection of only one sides point
of view, but it's not one that usually gets seen. I love the outdoors, and
I also love to take the Jeep out and enjoy it. I spend just as much time on
hiking trips as I do taking the Jeep out, but if that makes me a bad person,
so be it. I also hunt though, so I'm probably going to hell anyways.
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
and down streams for the hell of it, or plans to change the tranny fluid in
the middle of the river. This may be a collection of only one sides point
of view, but it's not one that usually gets seen. I love the outdoors, and
I also love to take the Jeep out and enjoy it. I spend just as much time on
hiking trips as I do taking the Jeep out, but if that makes me a bad person,
so be it. I also hunt though, so I'm probably going to hell anyways.
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
I think we are talking about reasonable uses. I doubt anyone here drives up
and down streams for the hell of it, or plans to change the tranny fluid in
the middle of the river. This may be a collection of only one sides point
of view, but it's not one that usually gets seen. I love the outdoors, and
I also love to take the Jeep out and enjoy it. I spend just as much time on
hiking trips as I do taking the Jeep out, but if that makes me a bad person,
so be it. I also hunt though, so I'm probably going to hell anyways.
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
and down streams for the hell of it, or plans to change the tranny fluid in
the middle of the river. This may be a collection of only one sides point
of view, but it's not one that usually gets seen. I love the outdoors, and
I also love to take the Jeep out and enjoy it. I spend just as much time on
hiking trips as I do taking the Jeep out, but if that makes me a bad person,
so be it. I also hunt though, so I'm probably going to hell anyways.
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Good off-roading video
I think we are talking about reasonable uses. I doubt anyone here drives up
and down streams for the hell of it, or plans to change the tranny fluid in
the middle of the river. This may be a collection of only one sides point
of view, but it's not one that usually gets seen. I love the outdoors, and
I also love to take the Jeep out and enjoy it. I spend just as much time on
hiking trips as I do taking the Jeep out, but if that makes me a bad person,
so be it. I also hunt though, so I'm probably going to hell anyways.
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>
and down streams for the hell of it, or plans to change the tranny fluid in
the middle of the river. This may be a collection of only one sides point
of view, but it's not one that usually gets seen. I love the outdoors, and
I also love to take the Jeep out and enjoy it. I spend just as much time on
hiking trips as I do taking the Jeep out, but if that makes me a bad person,
so be it. I also hunt though, so I'm probably going to hell anyways.
> While I'm all for reasonable uses of of the outdoors, there's plenty of
> -------- on both sides. The video's just a collection of one side's
> -------- and pandering.
>