Front U-joints
02-17-2007, 09:30 AM
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@***.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...
You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@***.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...
You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
02-17-2007, 09:30 AM
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@***.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...
You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@***.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...
You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
02-17-2007, 09:30 AM
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@***.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...
You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@***.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...
You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
02-17-2007, 10:26 AM
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
02-17-2007, 10:26 AM
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
02-17-2007, 10:26 AM
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
02-17-2007, 10:26 AM
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
better than the concrete block trick.
I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the
weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the
extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price.
Garth Almgren wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>>
>>><billhug...@***.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>>>>Of course, even you could pretend:
>>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>>
>>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
>>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>>
>>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
>>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
>>frame...
>
>
> You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
> take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
> themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
> 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
> soft 2x4s can be.
>
>
> --
> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"
>
>
02-17-2007, 08:49 PM
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
Real Jeeps don't use no stinkin' jacks:
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg
God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
> --
> Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg
God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
> --
> Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
02-17-2007, 08:49 PM
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
Real Jeeps don't use no stinkin' jacks:
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg
God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
> --
> Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg
God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
> --
> Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
02-17-2007, 08:49 PM
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Front U-joints
Real Jeeps don't use no stinkin' jacks:
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg
God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
> --
> Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg
God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
> --
> Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com