Door Removal
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
Who gave you the ticket, it defiantly wasn't a California Highway
Patrolmen.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> It has to be up. Personal experience prevails over speculation.
Patrolmen.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> It has to be up. Personal experience prevails over speculation.
#122
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
"Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it but did not
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
#123
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
"Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it but did not
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
#124
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
"Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it but did not
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
#125
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
"Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it but did not
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
like it."
Sure, and you didn't inhale... LOL
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108e2ikl3v5676b@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4086FF6A.C243FA7@sympatico.ca...
> > Read it carefully Jeff.
> >
> > It just says you must 'have' a windshield.
> >
> > It also states that the way a stock one works is just fine, even if the
> > stock one folds down.
> >
> > Very much like signal lights on a Bike. If the bike didn't come with
> > them, you don't have to add them, hand signals are legal.
> >
> I understand what you are saying. But the fact is that on the signals, if
it
> hasn't got signals as a new vehicle today is required to have, it is not
> street legal - it is only street legal if it is an older machine that
never
> had signals.
>
> The windshield is not required on older cars that never had a windshield,
> but it is required on all newer cars. "Newer" is a relative term, in the
> case of a windshield, I have never seen a car made after the 40's that did
> not have a windshield. There could be a few, but they are most certainly
the
> exception as opposed to the rule. Bikes were required to have turn signals
> for street use from sometime around 1980, give or take a few years.
>
>
>
>
> > It does 'not' state that you cannot use the windshield as it was
> > designed to be used, folded, it certainly implies otherwise.
> >
> > The law here in Ontario Canada is the same. You 'have' to have a
> > windshield and a working wiper, that's it.
> >
>
> I was driving with my brother and his windshield was folded down, we got
> stopped. Personally, I don't like my windshield folded down. I tried it
but
> did not like it. I haven't got the thumbscrews either, so I have to use
> tools to get mine to fold down. Maybe the tools added the tie-breaker that
> made the experience not worth the effort.
>
>
#126
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
Roughly 4/21/04 13:30, L.W.(ßill) ------ III's monkeys randomly typed:
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
#127
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
Roughly 4/21/04 13:30, L.W.(ßill) ------ III's monkeys randomly typed:
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
#128
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
Roughly 4/21/04 13:30, L.W.(ßill) ------ III's monkeys randomly typed:
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
#129
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Door Removal
Roughly 4/21/04 13:30, L.W.(ßill) ------ III's monkeys randomly typed:
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Hi Jeff,
> Everyone with a real Jeep must fold the windshield down and cruise
> Kalifornia's boulevard, and it's perfectly legal, the law states a
> vehicle must be equipped with a windshield and wipers:
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26706.htm it doesn't say it must
> be up. However, after one trip you'll find it's very uncomfortable, the
> air is compressed and blasted to your face, many times stronger than on
> a motorcycle. But, if you like being the center of attention, it's the
> only way to go.
You also neglected to mention all the extra protein you can get
into your diet by smiling a lot....
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate