Evan

I bet it is pay-per-view





83 CJ 8, a work in progress
http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me

Evan

I bet it is pay-per-view





83 CJ 8, a work in progress
http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me

Evan

I bet it is pay-per-view





83 CJ 8, a work in progress
http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me

Joe

Now THIS is what I'm talking about!! http://tinyurl.com/xpbh

"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2vwzb.3166$Oe5.2901@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> OK, this is really bothering me now. First I click on a lingerie link...
no
> pictures... then "half nekkid
> babes playing football"... no pics... damn you all!!
>
> "Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
> news:9hwzb.298194$ao4.1023791@attbi_s51...
> > Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:
> >
> > > I saw that too.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.
> >
> > <http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>
> >
> > I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
> > babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
> > same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.
> >
> > I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
> > from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
> > extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
> > want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
> > to run it on the Playboy channel.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
> >
>
>

Joe

Now THIS is what I'm talking about!! http://tinyurl.com/xpbh

"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2vwzb.3166$Oe5.2901@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> OK, this is really bothering me now. First I click on a lingerie link...
no
> pictures... then "half nekkid
> babes playing football"... no pics... damn you all!!
>
> "Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
> news:9hwzb.298194$ao4.1023791@attbi_s51...
> > Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:
> >
> > > I saw that too.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.
> >
> > <http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>
> >
> > I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
> > babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
> > same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.
> >
> > I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
> > from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
> > extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
> > want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
> > to run it on the Playboy channel.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
> >
>
>

Joe

Now THIS is what I'm talking about!! http://tinyurl.com/xpbh

"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2vwzb.3166$Oe5.2901@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> OK, this is really bothering me now. First I click on a lingerie link...
no
> pictures... then "half nekkid
> babes playing football"... no pics... damn you all!!
>
> "Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
> news:9hwzb.298194$ao4.1023791@attbi_s51...
> > Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:
> >
> > > I saw that too.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.
> >
> > <http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>
> >
> > I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
> > babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
> > same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.
> >
> > I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
> > from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
> > extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
> > want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
> > to run it on the Playboy channel.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
> >
>
>

Bob Nunues

ebmvi@aol.comxxx (Evan) wrote in message news:<20031203212626.13711.00000081@mb-m10.aol.com>...
> I bet it is pay-per-view
>
>
>
>
>
> 83 CJ 8, a work in progress
> http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
> Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me


It is pay-per-view. It's also looking for a new sponsor, for on
Wednesday, December 17, after receiving complaints from customers,
family values organizations, and Dodge dealers, DiamlerChrysler's
Dodge division pulled the plug on sponsorship of this event. Not only
that, the AIDS charity organization that was going to receive
donations from the $19.95 price for the PPV event had pulled out as
well. Apparently, the top brass at DiamlerChrysler knew nothing about
the Dodge sponsorship at first, for the idea of sponsoring this event
was hatched be a lower level executive (who happened to be female).
This episode is somewhat remeniscent of what Dodge tried to do with
the ABC network version of "The Lawrence Welk Show" just prior to its
1955 network debut. The Dodge folks tried to force Mr. Welk to add to
his show a group of dancing girls and/or a comedian. Lawrence,
however, wanted none of that. He warned them that having a comedian,
or even worse, a bunch of dancing girls, would end up being a turn-off
to potential viewers, and potential Dodge customers. I recommend
reading Mr. Welk's autobiography, "Wunnerful! Wunnerful" for a more
complete story. Perhaps it was the spirit of Mr. Welk himself, as
well as the complaints, that led to DiamlerChrysler's reversal.

Thanks for reading.

Bob
cspaniel@cdsnet.net
http://home.internetcds.com/~cspaniel

Bob Nunues

ebmvi@aol.comxxx (Evan) wrote in message news:<20031203212626.13711.00000081@mb-m10.aol.com>...
> I bet it is pay-per-view
>
>
>
>
>
> 83 CJ 8, a work in progress
> http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
> Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me


It is pay-per-view. It's also looking for a new sponsor, for on
Wednesday, December 17, after receiving complaints from customers,
family values organizations, and Dodge dealers, DiamlerChrysler's
Dodge division pulled the plug on sponsorship of this event. Not only
that, the AIDS charity organization that was going to receive
donations from the $19.95 price for the PPV event had pulled out as
well. Apparently, the top brass at DiamlerChrysler knew nothing about
the Dodge sponsorship at first, for the idea of sponsoring this event
was hatched be a lower level executive (who happened to be female).
This episode is somewhat remeniscent of what Dodge tried to do with
the ABC network version of "The Lawrence Welk Show" just prior to its
1955 network debut. The Dodge folks tried to force Mr. Welk to add to
his show a group of dancing girls and/or a comedian. Lawrence,
however, wanted none of that. He warned them that having a comedian,
or even worse, a bunch of dancing girls, would end up being a turn-off
to potential viewers, and potential Dodge customers. I recommend
reading Mr. Welk's autobiography, "Wunnerful! Wunnerful" for a more
complete story. Perhaps it was the spirit of Mr. Welk himself, as
well as the complaints, that led to DiamlerChrysler's reversal.

Thanks for reading.

Bob
cspaniel@cdsnet.net
http://home.internetcds.com/~cspaniel

Bob Nunues

ebmvi@aol.comxxx (Evan) wrote in message news:<20031203212626.13711.00000081@mb-m10.aol.com>...
> I bet it is pay-per-view
>
>
>
>
>
> 83 CJ 8, a work in progress
> http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
> Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me


It is pay-per-view. It's also looking for a new sponsor, for on
Wednesday, December 17, after receiving complaints from customers,
family values organizations, and Dodge dealers, DiamlerChrysler's
Dodge division pulled the plug on sponsorship of this event. Not only
that, the AIDS charity organization that was going to receive
donations from the $19.95 price for the PPV event had pulled out as
well. Apparently, the top brass at DiamlerChrysler knew nothing about
the Dodge sponsorship at first, for the idea of sponsoring this event
was hatched be a lower level executive (who happened to be female).
This episode is somewhat remeniscent of what Dodge tried to do with
the ABC network version of "The Lawrence Welk Show" just prior to its
1955 network debut. The Dodge folks tried to force Mr. Welk to add to
his show a group of dancing girls and/or a comedian. Lawrence,
however, wanted none of that. He warned them that having a comedian,
or even worse, a bunch of dancing girls, would end up being a turn-off
to potential viewers, and potential Dodge customers. I recommend
reading Mr. Welk's autobiography, "Wunnerful! Wunnerful" for a more
complete story. Perhaps it was the spirit of Mr. Welk himself, as
well as the complaints, that led to DiamlerChrysler's reversal.

Thanks for reading.

Bob
cspaniel@cdsnet.net
http://home.internetcds.com/~cspaniel

Del Rawlins

On 18 Dec 2003 08:46 PM, Bob Nunues posted the following:

> well. Apparently, the top brass at DiamlerChrysler knew nothing about
> the Dodge sponsorship at first, for the idea of sponsoring this event
> was hatched be a lower level executive (who happened to be female).

Hopefully she was the highest level executive to approve the idea. If
she only came up with the idea and a man had to give the final go-ahead,
he is most likely looking for new employment at this time.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/