Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

http://money.cnn.com/2003/12/02/news...index.htm?cnn=
yes

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

I saw that too.


Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.



83 CJ 8, a work in progress
http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

I saw that too.


Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.



83 CJ 8, a work in progress
http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

I saw that too.


Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.



83 CJ 8, a work in progress
http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:

> I saw that too.
>
>
> Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.

<http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>

I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.

I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
to run it on the Playboy channel.


--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:

> I saw that too.
>
>
> Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.

<http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>

I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.

I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
to run it on the Playboy channel.


--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:

> I saw that too.
>
>
> Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.

<http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>

I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.

I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
to run it on the Playboy channel.


--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

OK, this is really bothering me now. First I click on a lingerie link... no
pictures... then "half nekkid
babes playing football"... no pics... damn you all!!

"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:9hwzb.298194$ao4.1023791@attbi_s51...
> Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:
>
> > I saw that too.
> >
> >
> > Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.
>
> <http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>
>
> I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
> babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
> same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.
>
> I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
> from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
> extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
> want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
> to run it on the Playboy channel.
>
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

OK, this is really bothering me now. First I click on a lingerie link... no
pictures... then "half nekkid
babes playing football"... no pics... damn you all!!

"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:9hwzb.298194$ao4.1023791@attbi_s51...
> Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:
>
> > I saw that too.
> >
> >
> > Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.
>
> <http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>
>
> I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
> babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
> same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.
>
> I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
> from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
> extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
> want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
> to run it on the Playboy channel.
>
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>

Re: Dodge plans lingerie bowl
 

OK, this is really bothering me now. First I click on a lingerie link... no
pictures... then "half nekkid
babes playing football"... no pics... damn you all!!

"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:9hwzb.298194$ao4.1023791@attbi_s51...
> Approximately 12/2/03 16:44, Evan uttered for posterity:
>
> > I saw that too.
> >
> >
> > Maybe they'll give Nathan his babes back.
>
> <http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6658&sid=173&n=156>
>
> I don't think so. Notice that this brilliant idea of half nekkid
> babes playing football during the Super Bowl was hatched by the
> same DC marketing flake that also does Jeeps.
>
> I suspect we may now know why DC wanted no trademark interference
> from anything named Hardcore Jeep. If this Dodge lingerie
> extravaganza goes over at all, just think of what they might
> want to do to draw attention to the Jeep brand name. May have
> to run it on the Playboy channel.
>
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>