Lon Stowell wrote:

> Just Taylor wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:07:44 -0700, Lon Stowell
>><lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>c wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:SnWdnTzfHvnu5L2iXTWJgA@comcast.com...
>>>>
>>>>>Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>>>>>[nothing of interest]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Do you HAVE to reply to every one of this troll's posts like this? It just
>>>>makes you as bad as him.
>>>>
>>>>Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>It is called 'doe snot'
>>>First person to see a post from a sociopathic git deletes the
>>>entire post, nobody follows up with one word intact, etc.
>>>On some groups, folks post their favorite recipes.
>>
>>What you are doing though is setting yourself up for a netkkkop
>>complaint on your exact responses though... No doubt from Leonard
>>himself.
>
>
> Ahh, but does your isp CARE? I learned of the tactic
> from the postmaster of a very large ISP. Cancellation
> of posting may be a TOS, but deleting all content from
> within a posting is a different issue.

You're a spammer AND an idiot. Congrats!

> Besides, many
> admins will take a look at a complainant's posts before
> bothering to read the rest of a complaint.
>

No, they will look at the fact that you are SPAMMING, dumbshit, and
cancel your posts, and send you a letter telling you to knock it the
---- off.

I noticed you stopped spamming the same lame-assed response. Good boy.
Now get read to learn your next trick.

 

Jeffrey Leonard wrote:

[unsurprisingly, still nothing of interest]

 

Is he still here??? I would think he would have given up and crawled back
into the toilet where he seems to have gotten most of his philosophy of
life, as well as most of his vocabulary!

"Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2L6dnck7XoRfD7yiXTWJkA@comcast.com...
> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>
> [unsurprisingly, still nothing of interest]
>

 

TJim wrote:

> Is he still here???


I'm so glad you stpped spamming, ********. Let me know if there's
anything else you need to learn.

 

Lon Stowell wrote:

> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>
> [unsurprisingly, still nothing of interest]
>



Loon, if it's not of any interest, why do you reply to it? You just end
up looking like a liar and a fool.