On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:07:44 -0700, Lon Stowell
<lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote:

>c wrote:
>
>> "Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:SnWdnTzfHvnu5L2iXTWJgA@comcast.com...
>>> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>>> [nothing of interest]
>>>
>>
>> Do you HAVE to reply to every one of this troll's posts like this? It just
>> makes you as bad as him.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
> It is called 'doe snot'
> First person to see a post from a sociopathic git deletes the
> entire post, nobody follows up with one word intact, etc.
> On some groups, folks post their favorite recipes.

What you are doing though is setting yourself up for a netkkkop
complaint on your exact responses though... No doubt from Leonard
himself.


--
Taylor

'89 Audi 200
'01 Audi A6 2.7T
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport

 

Lon Stowell wrote:

> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
> [nothing of interest]
>
Nice to see you contributing so healthily to the group, Lon!

 

Lon Stowell wrote:

> Just ignore the stupid git.

Just like Lon has been "ignoring" *every single one* of my posts...by
seeking them out, and then responding to them!

 

Lon Stowell wrote:

> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
> [nothing of interest]
>

The BI count on your spam is reaching cancellable proportions, dumb----!

 

Lon Stowell wrote:

> c wrote:
>
>
>>"Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:SnWdnTzfHvnu5L2iXTWJgA@comcast.com...
>>
>>>Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>>>[nothing of interest]
>>>
>>
>>Do you HAVE to reply to every one of this troll's posts like this? It just
>>makes you as bad as him.
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>
>
> It is called 'doe snot'

Yeah, yeah, we heard that lame stupid ------- pun the first time you
vomited it.

 

That's what *I* did. Actually, it makes it more interesting reading other
people's comments and discussions of the bozo's posts without actually
having to read the bozo's own obnoxious blather! :) It's also got to get
the troll's goat (intended) hearing himself/herself/itself constantly
referred to in the third person. Kind of like being in a room trying to get
everyone's attention and no one can see you or hear you, but they're all
talking about what a jerk you are. :)
TJim

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:iy%Ta.71615$R92.56905@news2.central.***.net.. .
> c wrote:
> > "Lon Stowell" wrote ...
> >> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
> >> [nothing of interest]
> >>
> >
> > Do you HAVE to reply to every one of this troll's posts like this? It
just
> > makes you as bad as him.
>
> Makes me wonder people don't just killfile the bozo like I have.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>

 

Actually, I like that tactic. It keeps the his/her/its ranting and drivel
out of the responses. As long as I don't have to read the original
babbling, I don't care *what* the she/it head posts. ;)

"Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:G1idnXAU69EKDb2iXTWJjA@comcast.com...
> Just ignore the stupid git. And if do you follow up to her,
> make sure nothing of her temper tantrum is left in the
> followup. For some reason, being ignored tends to make
> 2 year old sociopaths scream bloody murder, perhaps she
> will lay on the floor and kick her feet in the air and
> hold her breath until she turns blue.
>
> And don't worry about TOS, news admins have been allowing
> the doe snot tactic for long before this git was found
> under a rock. It may have been a demon admin that
> first called it doe snot. [doe snot exist].
>
> TJim wrote:
>
> > Ooooohhh! Cool! Thanx.
> > Hope you can get this bozo in a heap o' trouble! He's earned it...
> > Good Luck,
> > TJim
> >
> > "Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:ylXTa.285240$_w.11019917@twister.southeast.rr .com...
> >> "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> >> news:TcicncDR68Haor2iU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
> >> > What is alt.net
> >>
> >> an "anonymous" usenet service.
> >>
> >> > who is garyb@quasimidoradio.com?
> >>
> >> it appears that gary b would be jeffreys employer. regardless of
whether
> > or
> >> not he is actually jeffreys employer, gary b is relevant here because
> >> jeffrey is using gary b's company email as his contact point, therefore
> > his
> >> actions here reflect negatively upon gary b's company and thats not
> >> something that most business owners would be to happy about.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nathan W. Collier
> >> http://7SlotGrille.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

 

Just Taylor wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:07:44 -0700, Lon Stowell
> <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>c wrote:
>>
>>> "Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:SnWdnTzfHvnu5L2iXTWJgA@comcast.com...
>>>> Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>>>> [nothing of interest]
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you HAVE to reply to every one of this troll's posts like this? It just
>>> makes you as bad as him.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>> It is called 'doe snot'
>> First person to see a post from a sociopathic git deletes the
>> entire post, nobody follows up with one word intact, etc.
>> On some groups, folks post their favorite recipes.
>
> What you are doing though is setting yourself up for a netkkkop
> complaint on your exact responses though... No doubt from Leonard
> himself.

Ahh, but does your isp CARE? I learned of the tactic
from the postmaster of a very large ISP. Cancellation
of posting may be a TOS, but deleting all content from
within a posting is a different issue. Besides, many
admins will take a look at a complainant's posts before
bothering to read the rest of a complaint.

 

TJim wrote:

> That's what *I* did. Actually, it makes it more interesting reading other
> people's comments and discussions of the bozo's posts without actually
> having to read the bozo's own obnoxious blather! :) It's also got to get
> the troll's goat (intended) hearing himself/herself/itself constantly
> referred to in the third person. Kind of like being in a room trying to get
> everyone's attention and no one can see you or hear you, but they're all
> talking about what a jerk you are. :)

In other words, you're too chicken ---- to actually engage whoever
you're criticizing in a direct fashion. Go grow a set of nuts.

 

TJim wrote:

> Actually, I like that taBOINK!

Would you shut the ---- up already? We're trying to talk about Jeeps here.