"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42953CF8.B8F27224@***.net...
> You got it! The U.S.of A. must produce a product then sell more of
> it to the world than we buy. That's what supports our dollar, like
> everyone is selling life insurance, maybe a little litigation, and
> doctors caring for the elderly are only services. Like our trade deficit
> is marking the time we have until the end. No product, no economy it's
> as simple as that!

So W is bringing the Rapture?
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42953CF8.B8F27224@***.net...
> You got it! The U.S.of A. must produce a product then sell more of
> it to the world than we buy. That's what supports our dollar, like
> everyone is selling life insurance, maybe a little litigation, and
> doctors caring for the elderly are only services. Like our trade deficit
> is marking the time we have until the end. No product, no economy it's
> as simple as that!

So W is bringing the Rapture?
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42953CF8.B8F27224@***.net...
> You got it! The U.S.of A. must produce a product then sell more of
> it to the world than we buy. That's what supports our dollar, like
> everyone is selling life insurance, maybe a little litigation, and
> doctors caring for the elderly are only services. Like our trade deficit
> is marking the time we have until the end. No product, no economy it's
> as simple as that!

So W is bringing the Rapture?
__
Steve
..

 

Yes Armageddon has begun, via Afghanistan, and with the nuclear War
beginning in Syria, and Iran, we'll exterminate the near east, this my
Bible tells me so.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> So W is bringing the Rapture?
> __
> Steve
> .

 

Yes Armageddon has begun, via Afghanistan, and with the nuclear War
beginning in Syria, and Iran, we'll exterminate the near east, this my
Bible tells me so.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> So W is bringing the Rapture?
> __
> Steve
> .

 

Yes Armageddon has begun, via Afghanistan, and with the nuclear War
beginning in Syria, and Iran, we'll exterminate the near east, this my
Bible tells me so.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> So W is bringing the Rapture?
> __
> Steve
> .

 

Yes Armageddon has begun, via Afghanistan, and with the nuclear War
beginning in Syria, and Iran, we'll exterminate the near east, this my
Bible tells me so.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> So W is bringing the Rapture?
> __
> Steve
> .

 

> For this country to survive, we need people earning good livings. I don't
> just mean a few with college educations, I mean the vast majority of
> everyday people. Then, they pay lots of taxes, the government has money to
> do its job, and the consumer market flourishes and fuels a booming
> economy. Instead, we're trying to rid this country of good paying jobs by
> exporting them somewhere else. I heard a local talk radio host claim that
> we export low paying jobs and gain high paying jobs in the process.
> However, I don't see those jobs lost by GM, Ford, and DC worker to Mexico
> as being low pay.>

Interesting to note that our domestic auto mfrs, particularly GM & Ford,
continue to lose market share (and, hence, jobs) to the Asians. GM, Ford &
DC have shed over 130,000 jobs since 2000. Over the same period, however,
the Asians & Europeans have continued to invest in the "high-cost" USA,
opening new plants and employing thousands of workers. Unfortunately, due to
the built-in inefficiencies of the UAW-bound domestics, they've only
replaced about 30,000 jobs over the same period of time. It should be no
mystery why the UAW has been unsuccessful in organizing the Asian plants,
they simply have nothing to offer the workers but lost income and eventual
unemployment.

> I'm telling you...this trend is dangerous for the economy in the long run.
> It's good for corporate America, but bad for you and I.<

Well, it's not even "Corporate America" any more, most of the companies are
so globally invested we don't even run them.

Back in the late '90's the Ford division I worked for was paying a bunch of
individual systems consultants as much as $175 an hour to write code as part
of a giant "mainframe to client server conversion", common among older
companies all over the world at the time. There was also the old "Y2K"
fiasco that had to be dealt with. Along came Satyam, and Indian company, who
we found could do much more work, and only cost about $20 an hour. The
decision to farm it all out to them was a no-brainer.

 

> For this country to survive, we need people earning good livings. I don't
> just mean a few with college educations, I mean the vast majority of
> everyday people. Then, they pay lots of taxes, the government has money to
> do its job, and the consumer market flourishes and fuels a booming
> economy. Instead, we're trying to rid this country of good paying jobs by
> exporting them somewhere else. I heard a local talk radio host claim that
> we export low paying jobs and gain high paying jobs in the process.
> However, I don't see those jobs lost by GM, Ford, and DC worker to Mexico
> as being low pay.>

Interesting to note that our domestic auto mfrs, particularly GM & Ford,
continue to lose market share (and, hence, jobs) to the Asians. GM, Ford &
DC have shed over 130,000 jobs since 2000. Over the same period, however,
the Asians & Europeans have continued to invest in the "high-cost" USA,
opening new plants and employing thousands of workers. Unfortunately, due to
the built-in inefficiencies of the UAW-bound domestics, they've only
replaced about 30,000 jobs over the same period of time. It should be no
mystery why the UAW has been unsuccessful in organizing the Asian plants,
they simply have nothing to offer the workers but lost income and eventual
unemployment.

> I'm telling you...this trend is dangerous for the economy in the long run.
> It's good for corporate America, but bad for you and I.<

Well, it's not even "Corporate America" any more, most of the companies are
so globally invested we don't even run them.

Back in the late '90's the Ford division I worked for was paying a bunch of
individual systems consultants as much as $175 an hour to write code as part
of a giant "mainframe to client server conversion", common among older
companies all over the world at the time. There was also the old "Y2K"
fiasco that had to be dealt with. Along came Satyam, and Indian company, who
we found could do much more work, and only cost about $20 an hour. The
decision to farm it all out to them was a no-brainer.

 

> For this country to survive, we need people earning good livings. I don't
> just mean a few with college educations, I mean the vast majority of
> everyday people. Then, they pay lots of taxes, the government has money to
> do its job, and the consumer market flourishes and fuels a booming
> economy. Instead, we're trying to rid this country of good paying jobs by
> exporting them somewhere else. I heard a local talk radio host claim that
> we export low paying jobs and gain high paying jobs in the process.
> However, I don't see those jobs lost by GM, Ford, and DC worker to Mexico
> as being low pay.>

Interesting to note that our domestic auto mfrs, particularly GM & Ford,
continue to lose market share (and, hence, jobs) to the Asians. GM, Ford &
DC have shed over 130,000 jobs since 2000. Over the same period, however,
the Asians & Europeans have continued to invest in the "high-cost" USA,
opening new plants and employing thousands of workers. Unfortunately, due to
the built-in inefficiencies of the UAW-bound domestics, they've only
replaced about 30,000 jobs over the same period of time. It should be no
mystery why the UAW has been unsuccessful in organizing the Asian plants,
they simply have nothing to offer the workers but lost income and eventual
unemployment.

> I'm telling you...this trend is dangerous for the economy in the long run.
> It's good for corporate America, but bad for you and I.<

Well, it's not even "Corporate America" any more, most of the companies are
so globally invested we don't even run them.

Back in the late '90's the Ford division I worked for was paying a bunch of
individual systems consultants as much as $175 an hour to write code as part
of a giant "mainframe to client server conversion", common among older
companies all over the world at the time. There was also the old "Y2K"
fiasco that had to be dealt with. Along came Satyam, and Indian company, who
we found could do much more work, and only cost about $20 an hour. The
decision to farm it all out to them was a no-brainer.