Re: OT Dana44 for XJ
 

Yes, it's in your header: Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:43:58 +0200
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (I hope this posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for alerting me to my out of sync postings. Because I never sent
> messages to myself, and no-one else complained, I was not aware of it. Also,
> my home language is not english, so when you spoke of Windows I thought you
> meant Windows tm and not operating systems in general, same as some people
> refer to all off-road 4WD vehicles as Jeeps. In my operating system the time
> zone is determined by a variable called TZ which contains fields to describe
> the actual zone, the relation to UTC, and information about the day light
> saving period. TZ can be modified manually or set by the OS. As far as I can
> determine, setting it by the OS gives a valid variable, unless standards have
> changed recently (example BST = British Summer Time (in which I am not) or BST
> = Bravo Standard Time (in which I am apparently now) although previously I was
> in SAT = South African Time). Also, without day light saving, the rest of the
> fields are zeros. However, this all seems to confuse the hell out of Mozilla,
> which is still a work in progress, and after many trail e-mails to myself I
> now have a day light saving (1 second) period of 1 day in January and yes, I
> had to move to BST. This brought my postings to myself in sync and I hope it
> works when crossing time zones as well. I still think the problem lies with
> Mozilla.
>
> Bertie.

Re: OT Dana44 for XJ
 

Yes, it's in your header: Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:43:58 +0200
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (I hope this posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for alerting me to my out of sync postings. Because I never sent
> messages to myself, and no-one else complained, I was not aware of it. Also,
> my home language is not english, so when you spoke of Windows I thought you
> meant Windows tm and not operating systems in general, same as some people
> refer to all off-road 4WD vehicles as Jeeps. In my operating system the time
> zone is determined by a variable called TZ which contains fields to describe
> the actual zone, the relation to UTC, and information about the day light
> saving period. TZ can be modified manually or set by the OS. As far as I can
> determine, setting it by the OS gives a valid variable, unless standards have
> changed recently (example BST = British Summer Time (in which I am not) or BST
> = Bravo Standard Time (in which I am apparently now) although previously I was
> in SAT = South African Time). Also, without day light saving, the rest of the
> fields are zeros. However, this all seems to confuse the hell out of Mozilla,
> which is still a work in progress, and after many trail e-mails to myself I
> now have a day light saving (1 second) period of 1 day in January and yes, I
> had to move to BST. This brought my postings to myself in sync and I hope it
> works when crossing time zones as well. I still think the problem lies with
> Mozilla.
>
> Bertie.

Re: OT Dana44 for XJ
 

Yes, it's in your header: Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:43:58 +0200
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (I hope this posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for alerting me to my out of sync postings. Because I never sent
> messages to myself, and no-one else complained, I was not aware of it. Also,
> my home language is not english, so when you spoke of Windows I thought you
> meant Windows tm and not operating systems in general, same as some people
> refer to all off-road 4WD vehicles as Jeeps. In my operating system the time
> zone is determined by a variable called TZ which contains fields to describe
> the actual zone, the relation to UTC, and information about the day light
> saving period. TZ can be modified manually or set by the OS. As far as I can
> determine, setting it by the OS gives a valid variable, unless standards have
> changed recently (example BST = British Summer Time (in which I am not) or BST
> = Bravo Standard Time (in which I am apparently now) although previously I was
> in SAT = South African Time). Also, without day light saving, the rest of the
> fields are zeros. However, this all seems to confuse the hell out of Mozilla,
> which is still a work in progress, and after many trail e-mails to myself I
> now have a day light saving (1 second) period of 1 day in January and yes, I
> had to move to BST. This brought my postings to myself in sync and I hope it
> works when crossing time zones as well. I still think the problem lies with
> Mozilla.
>
> Bertie.

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

TJ: http://7slotgrille.com/tech/sye2/index.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (Hope my posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for the warning. Part of my D44 upgrade plan is to move the slip yoke
> from the tranfer case output to the drive shaft. By shortening the TC shaft,
> this will hopefulle compensate for the longer D44 pinion.
>
> Bertie.

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

TJ: http://7slotgrille.com/tech/sye2/index.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (Hope my posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for the warning. Part of my D44 upgrade plan is to move the slip yoke
> from the tranfer case output to the drive shaft. By shortening the TC shaft,
> this will hopefulle compensate for the longer D44 pinion.
>
> Bertie.

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

TJ: http://7slotgrille.com/tech/sye2/index.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (Hope my posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for the warning. Part of my D44 upgrade plan is to move the slip yoke
> from the tranfer case output to the drive shaft. By shortening the TC shaft,
> this will hopefulle compensate for the longer D44 pinion.
>
> Bertie.

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

TJ: http://7slotgrille.com/tech/sye2/index.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (Hope my posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks for the warning. Part of my D44 upgrade plan is to move the slip yoke
> from the tranfer case output to the drive shaft. By shortening the TC shaft,
> this will hopefulle compensate for the longer D44 pinion.
>
> Bertie.

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

If you were to break the stronger 8.8 axle:
http://----------.com/dana35c/ford8dana35axles.jpg and used the disk
brakes that more than likely will be on it, the calipers will keep the
wheel from falling off so you may drive back to civilization.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (I hope this posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks, but only a limited range of Fords has become available here recently.
> Previous Fords were basically the same as Mazda (made in the same factory
> and looking the same except for the badge). Still, if they do have a Ford 8.8
> that will use a six wheel bolt axle shaft which means that I will also need to
> upgrade in front. Do the 8.8 not use c-clips? Disk brakes are tempting and I
> have an article on how to swap ZJ disc brakes onto an XJ D44.
>
> Bertie

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

If you were to break the stronger 8.8 axle:
http://----------.com/dana35c/ford8dana35axles.jpg and used the disk
brakes that more than likely will be on it, the calipers will keep the
wheel from falling off so you may drive back to civilization.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (I hope this posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks, but only a limited range of Fords has become available here recently.
> Previous Fords were basically the same as Mazda (made in the same factory
> and looking the same except for the badge). Still, if they do have a Ford 8.8
> that will use a six wheel bolt axle shaft which means that I will also need to
> upgrade in front. Do the 8.8 not use c-clips? Disk brakes are tempting and I
> have an article on how to swap ZJ disc brakes onto an XJ D44.
>
> Bertie

Re: Dana44 for XJ
 

If you were to break the stronger 8.8 axle:
http://----------.com/dana35c/ford8dana35axles.jpg and used the disk
brakes that more than likely will be on it, the calipers will keep the
wheel from falling off so you may drive back to civilization.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Bertie Kemp" wrote:
>
> (I hope this posting is in sync now.)
>
> Thanks, but only a limited range of Fords has become available here recently.
> Previous Fords were basically the same as Mazda (made in the same factory
> and looking the same except for the badge). Still, if they do have a Ford 8.8
> that will use a six wheel bolt axle shaft which means that I will also need to
> upgrade in front. Do the 8.8 not use c-clips? Disk brakes are tempting and I
> have an article on how to swap ZJ disc brakes onto an XJ D44.
>
> Bertie