cold start sluggishness
#111
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: cold start sluggishness --------DL.jpg (1/1) [85K] - -------DL.jpg (1/1) [85K]
Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> You tried this one before, Bloater, and came up with /one/.
>
> This time let's see /plenty/; after all you save everything. If you did
> succeed (as opposed to suck seed), you'd have an archive of them. You make
> the claim, now offer up some proof of your claim.
>
> And whil you're at it, why don't you tell the truth (hope that word
> didn't set your monitor on fire) about what you mean by 'squashed' and
> 'taking someone's IP' ?? The /truth/, lardball.
>
> That truth is a far cry from what people usually think, and it's a good
> 'cheater' example of how you think you have some power.
>
> Put it on the table, Übermensch.
your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> You tried this one before, Bloater, and came up with /one/.
>
> This time let's see /plenty/; after all you save everything. If you did
> succeed (as opposed to suck seed), you'd have an archive of them. You make
> the claim, now offer up some proof of your claim.
>
> And whil you're at it, why don't you tell the truth (hope that word
> didn't set your monitor on fire) about what you mean by 'squashed' and
> 'taking someone's IP' ?? The /truth/, lardball.
>
> That truth is a far cry from what people usually think, and it's a good
> 'cheater' example of how you think you have some power.
>
> Put it on the table, Übermensch.
#112
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: cold start sluggishness --------DL.jpg (1/1) [85K] - -------DL.jpg (1/1) [85K]
Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> You tried this one before, Bloater, and came up with /one/.
>
> This time let's see /plenty/; after all you save everything. If you did
> succeed (as opposed to suck seed), you'd have an archive of them. You make
> the claim, now offer up some proof of your claim.
>
> And whil you're at it, why don't you tell the truth (hope that word
> didn't set your monitor on fire) about what you mean by 'squashed' and
> 'taking someone's IP' ?? The /truth/, lardball.
>
> That truth is a far cry from what people usually think, and it's a good
> 'cheater' example of how you think you have some power.
>
> Put it on the table, Übermensch.
your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> You tried this one before, Bloater, and came up with /one/.
>
> This time let's see /plenty/; after all you save everything. If you did
> succeed (as opposed to suck seed), you'd have an archive of them. You make
> the claim, now offer up some proof of your claim.
>
> And whil you're at it, why don't you tell the truth (hope that word
> didn't set your monitor on fire) about what you mean by 'squashed' and
> 'taking someone's IP' ?? The /truth/, lardball.
>
> That truth is a far cry from what people usually think, and it's a good
> 'cheater' example of how you think you have some power.
>
> Put it on the table, Übermensch.
#113
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: Billy Huge's mental sluggishness
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
Cogent lines:
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
Interesting date.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
closed!
And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
complete or useable data.
No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
closed. Especially when.....
> Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
sexual frustration.
Yep.
Loser.
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
> (REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
> To: <----------@***.net>
>
> An incident reported by you has been updated. Sev: 4
> The incident # is listed below. No need to respond to this e-mail.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
> UPDATED
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Summary: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup Think L.W.(Bill) ------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
> These connection logs will include the complete IP
> address, date, time and time zone associated with the
> abusive action. Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
>
> Regards,
> Postmaster
> To find more information on filtering SPAM, please visit
> http_//help.attbusiness.net/index.cfm
> and type the word filter into the search engine.
> If you feel we handled this incident improperly or require
> assistance providing headers, please call 800-821-4612.
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
>
> If replying via email, do not alter the reference id in the subject
> line and send only new information, do not send entire note again.
> Do not send attachments, graphics or images.
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
Cogent lines:
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
Interesting date.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
closed!
And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
complete or useable data.
No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
closed. Especially when.....
> Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
sexual frustration.
Yep.
Loser.
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
> (REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
> To: <----------@***.net>
>
> An incident reported by you has been updated. Sev: 4
> The incident # is listed below. No need to respond to this e-mail.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
> UPDATED
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Summary: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup Think L.W.(Bill) ------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
> These connection logs will include the complete IP
> address, date, time and time zone associated with the
> abusive action. Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
>
> Regards,
> Postmaster
> To find more information on filtering SPAM, please visit
> http_//help.attbusiness.net/index.cfm
> and type the word filter into the search engine.
> If you feel we handled this incident improperly or require
> assistance providing headers, please call 800-821-4612.
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
>
> If replying via email, do not alter the reference id in the subject
> line and send only new information, do not send entire note again.
> Do not send attachments, graphics or images.
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: Billy Huge's mental sluggishness
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
Cogent lines:
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
Interesting date.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
closed!
And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
complete or useable data.
No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
closed. Especially when.....
> Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
sexual frustration.
Yep.
Loser.
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
> (REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
> To: <----------@***.net>
>
> An incident reported by you has been updated. Sev: 4
> The incident # is listed below. No need to respond to this e-mail.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
> UPDATED
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Summary: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup Think L.W.(Bill) ------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
> These connection logs will include the complete IP
> address, date, time and time zone associated with the
> abusive action. Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
>
> Regards,
> Postmaster
> To find more information on filtering SPAM, please visit
> http_//help.attbusiness.net/index.cfm
> and type the word filter into the search engine.
> If you feel we handled this incident improperly or require
> assistance providing headers, please call 800-821-4612.
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
>
> If replying via email, do not alter the reference id in the subject
> line and send only new information, do not send entire note again.
> Do not send attachments, graphics or images.
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
Cogent lines:
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
Interesting date.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
closed!
And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
complete or useable data.
No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
closed. Especially when.....
> Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
sexual frustration.
Yep.
Loser.
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
> (REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
> To: <----------@***.net>
>
> An incident reported by you has been updated. Sev: 4
> The incident # is listed below. No need to respond to this e-mail.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
> UPDATED
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Summary: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup Think L.W.(Bill) ------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
> These connection logs will include the complete IP
> address, date, time and time zone associated with the
> abusive action. Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
>
> Regards,
> Postmaster
> To find more information on filtering SPAM, please visit
> http_//help.attbusiness.net/index.cfm
> and type the word filter into the search engine.
> If you feel we handled this incident improperly or require
> assistance providing headers, please call 800-821-4612.
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
>
> If replying via email, do not alter the reference id in the subject
> line and send only new information, do not send entire note again.
> Do not send attachments, graphics or images.
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
#115
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: Billy Huge's mental sluggishness
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
Cogent lines:
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
Interesting date.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
closed!
And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
complete or useable data.
No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
closed. Especially when.....
> Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
sexual frustration.
Yep.
Loser.
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
> (REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
> To: <----------@***.net>
>
> An incident reported by you has been updated. Sev: 4
> The incident # is listed below. No need to respond to this e-mail.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
> UPDATED
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Summary: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup Think L.W.(Bill) ------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
> These connection logs will include the complete IP
> address, date, time and time zone associated with the
> abusive action. Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
>
> Regards,
> Postmaster
> To find more information on filtering SPAM, please visit
> http_//help.attbusiness.net/index.cfm
> and type the word filter into the search engine.
> If you feel we handled this incident improperly or require
> assistance providing headers, please call 800-821-4612.
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
>
> If replying via email, do not alter the reference id in the subject
> line and send only new information, do not send entire note again.
> Do not send attachments, graphics or images.
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
Cogent lines:
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
Interesting date.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
closed!
And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
complete or useable data.
No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
closed. Especially when.....
> Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
sexual frustration.
Yep.
Loser.
> From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
> (REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
> To: <----------@***.net>
>
> An incident reported by you has been updated. Sev: 4
> The incident # is listed below. No need to respond to this e-mail.
> For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
> UPDATED
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Summary: [Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup Think L.W.(Bill) ------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
>
> Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> However, we cannot take any further action
> until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
> These connection logs will include the complete IP
> address, date, time and time zone associated with the
> abusive action. Only with this information can we
> identify the responsible individual.
>
> Regards,
> Postmaster
> To find more information on filtering SPAM, please visit
> http_//help.attbusiness.net/index.cfm
> and type the word filter into the search engine.
> If you feel we handled this incident improperly or require
> assistance providing headers, please call 800-821-4612.
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
>
> If replying via email, do not alter the reference id in the subject
> line and send only new information, do not send entire note again.
> Do not send attachments, graphics or images.
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
#116
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: sluggishness in ------
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
> your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
> posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
Well, say "Hi!" for me......
Now:
Chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken
turkey duck.
Crossposted fowl language.
Hope it helps.
BTW, you've been reporting me for how long now? Two-plus /years/? And all
I've ever heard from my ISP is that they think /you/ are a jerk.
Why is that, Billy? Any ideas?
And why, every time you say you 'just need a few more posts' to shut
someone down, you always get the posts, but still nothing happens?
Ever?
Why not, Billy, why not?
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
> your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
> posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
Well, say "Hi!" for me......
Now:
Chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken
turkey duck.
Crossposted fowl language.
Hope it helps.
BTW, you've been reporting me for how long now? Two-plus /years/? And all
I've ever heard from my ISP is that they think /you/ are a jerk.
Why is that, Billy? Any ideas?
And why, every time you say you 'just need a few more posts' to shut
someone down, you always get the posts, but still nothing happens?
Ever?
Why not, Billy, why not?
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
#117
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: sluggishness in ------
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
> your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
> posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
Well, say "Hi!" for me......
Now:
Chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken
turkey duck.
Crossposted fowl language.
Hope it helps.
BTW, you've been reporting me for how long now? Two-plus /years/? And all
I've ever heard from my ISP is that they think /you/ are a jerk.
Why is that, Billy? Any ideas?
And why, every time you say you 'just need a few more posts' to shut
someone down, you always get the posts, but still nothing happens?
Ever?
Why not, Billy, why not?
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
> your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
> posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
Well, say "Hi!" for me......
Now:
Chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken
turkey duck.
Crossposted fowl language.
Hope it helps.
BTW, you've been reporting me for how long now? Two-plus /years/? And all
I've ever heard from my ISP is that they think /you/ are a jerk.
Why is that, Billy? Any ideas?
And why, every time you say you 'just need a few more posts' to shut
someone down, you always get the posts, but still nothing happens?
Ever?
Why not, Billy, why not?
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: sluggishness in ------
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
> your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
> posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
Well, say "Hi!" for me......
Now:
Chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken
turkey duck.
Crossposted fowl language.
Hope it helps.
BTW, you've been reporting me for how long now? Two-plus /years/? And all
I've ever heard from my ISP is that they think /you/ are a jerk.
Why is that, Billy? Any ideas?
And why, every time you say you 'just need a few more posts' to shut
someone down, you always get the posts, but still nothing happens?
Ever?
Why not, Billy, why not?
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Keep it up I'm talking with internet.abuse@sjrb.ca whom monitors
> your knoll on shaw.ca. Just a little more foul language and cross
> posting and I'll add 24.86.24.251 to my keyboard. :-)
Well, say "Hi!" for me......
Now:
Chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken turkey duck chicken
turkey duck.
Crossposted fowl language.
Hope it helps.
BTW, you've been reporting me for how long now? Two-plus /years/? And all
I've ever heard from my ISP is that they think /you/ are a jerk.
Why is that, Billy? Any ideas?
And why, every time you say you 'just need a few more posts' to shut
someone down, you always get the posts, but still nothing happens?
Ever?
Why not, Billy, why not?
--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"
-- Nancy ------ III
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: Billy Huge's mental sluggishness
Typo, actual header:
Return-Path:
<cssmast@mvsps1.vnet.ibm.com>
Received:
from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]) by
fed1mtai04.***.net (InterMail
vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id
<20021012054309.TTMK16525.fed1mtai04.***.net@e6.ny .us.ibm.com> for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (northrelay03.pok.ibm.com
[9.56.224.151]) by
e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
g9C5h9Dn037292 for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (bldvmb.pok.ibm.com
[9.117.222.139]) by
northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id
g9C5h85F018760 for
<----------%***.net@vmnorthrelay.us.ibm.com>; Sat, 12 Oct
2002 01:43:08 -0400
Message-ID:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
Received:
by BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via spool
with SMTP id 5298 ;
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:42:59 MDT
Date:
Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT)
From:
ABUSE@PRSERV.NET
To:
<----------@***.net>
CC:
Subject:
[Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
(REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
X-Mozilla-Status:
9001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
X-UIDL:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
--
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"§qu@r3 Wh33£s" <bubonic@germ.net> wrote in message
news:DE4fh.469752$R63.421232@pd7urf1no...
> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
> history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
>
> Cogent lines:
>
> > From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
>
> Interesting date.
>
>
> > For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> > Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
>
> The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
>
> States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
> closed!
>
> And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
>
>
> > RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> > However, we cannot take any further action
> > until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
>
> He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
> complete or useable data.
>
> No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
> account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
>
> A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
> closed. Especially when.....
>
> > Only with this information can we
> > identify the responsible individual.
>
> they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
> sexual frustration.
>
> Yep.
>
> Loser.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Return-Path:
<cssmast@mvsps1.vnet.ibm.com>
Received:
from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]) by
fed1mtai04.***.net (InterMail
vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id
<20021012054309.TTMK16525.fed1mtai04.***.net@e6.ny .us.ibm.com> for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (northrelay03.pok.ibm.com
[9.56.224.151]) by
e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
g9C5h9Dn037292 for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (bldvmb.pok.ibm.com
[9.117.222.139]) by
northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id
g9C5h85F018760 for
<----------%***.net@vmnorthrelay.us.ibm.com>; Sat, 12 Oct
2002 01:43:08 -0400
Message-ID:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
Received:
by BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via spool
with SMTP id 5298 ;
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:42:59 MDT
Date:
Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT)
From:
ABUSE@PRSERV.NET
To:
<----------@***.net>
CC:
Subject:
[Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
(REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
X-Mozilla-Status:
9001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
X-UIDL:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
--
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"§qu@r3 Wh33£s" <bubonic@germ.net> wrote in message
news:DE4fh.469752$R63.421232@pd7urf1no...
> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
> history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
>
> Cogent lines:
>
> > From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
>
> Interesting date.
>
>
> > For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> > Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
>
> The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
>
> States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
> closed!
>
> And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
>
>
> > RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> > However, we cannot take any further action
> > until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
>
> He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
> complete or useable data.
>
> No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
> account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
>
> A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
> closed. Especially when.....
>
> > Only with this information can we
> > identify the responsible individual.
>
> they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
> sexual frustration.
>
> Yep.
>
> Loser.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#120
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Here's a Goodie! Re: Billy Huge's mental sluggishness
Typo, actual header:
Return-Path:
<cssmast@mvsps1.vnet.ibm.com>
Received:
from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]) by
fed1mtai04.***.net (InterMail
vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id
<20021012054309.TTMK16525.fed1mtai04.***.net@e6.ny .us.ibm.com> for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (northrelay03.pok.ibm.com
[9.56.224.151]) by
e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
g9C5h9Dn037292 for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (bldvmb.pok.ibm.com
[9.117.222.139]) by
northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id
g9C5h85F018760 for
<----------%***.net@vmnorthrelay.us.ibm.com>; Sat, 12 Oct
2002 01:43:08 -0400
Message-ID:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
Received:
by BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via spool
with SMTP id 5298 ;
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:42:59 MDT
Date:
Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT)
From:
ABUSE@PRSERV.NET
To:
<----------@***.net>
CC:
Subject:
[Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
(REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
X-Mozilla-Status:
9001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
X-UIDL:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
--
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"§qu@r3 Wh33£s" <bubonic@germ.net> wrote in message
news:DE4fh.469752$R63.421232@pd7urf1no...
> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
> history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
>
> Cogent lines:
>
> > From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
>
> Interesting date.
>
>
> > For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> > Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
>
> The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
>
> States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
> closed!
>
> And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
>
>
> > RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> > However, we cannot take any further action
> > until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
>
> He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
> complete or useable data.
>
> No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
> account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
>
> A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
> closed. Especially when.....
>
> > Only with this information can we
> > identify the responsible individual.
>
> they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
> sexual frustration.
>
> Yep.
>
> Loser.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Return-Path:
<cssmast@mvsps1.vnet.ibm.com>
Received:
from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]) by
fed1mtai04.***.net (InterMail
vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id
<20021012054309.TTMK16525.fed1mtai04.***.net@e6.ny .us.ibm.com> for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (northrelay03.pok.ibm.com
[9.56.224.151]) by
e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
g9C5h9Dn037292 for
<----------@***.net>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:43:09 -0400
Received:
from BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (bldvmb.pok.ibm.com
[9.117.222.139]) by
northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id
g9C5h85F018760 for
<----------%***.net@vmnorthrelay.us.ibm.com>; Sat, 12 Oct
2002 01:43:08 -0400
Message-ID:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
Received:
by BLDVMB.POK.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via spool
with SMTP id 5298 ;
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:42:59 MDT
Date:
Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT)
From:
ABUSE@PRSERV.NET
To:
<----------@***.net>
CC:
Subject:
[Fwd: How Many People in this NewsGroup
(REF:#_CSSEMAIL_0642277)
X-Mozilla-Status:
9001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
X-UIDL:
<200210120543.g9C5h85F018760@northrelay03.pok.ibm. com>
--
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"§qu@r3 Wh33£s" <bubonic@germ.net> wrote in message
news:DE4fh.469752$R63.421232@pd7urf1no...
> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
> history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III bluffed very poorly.
>
> Cogent lines:
>
> > From: ABUSE@PRSERV.NET 10/11/06 10:43 PM
>
> Interesting date.
>
>
> > For Account: CSSEMAIL Incident Number: 0642277 Status: CLOSED
> > Last Updated: Sat, 12 OCT 2002 01:43:04 (-0400 GMT) PROBLEM
>
> The end of 2002; reported four years ago!
>
> States the acct. is closed? No, just that the complaint report has been
> closed!
>
> And it's a spam report, not abuse, as far as I can tell.
>
>
> > RESP 10/12/02 01:43:05
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to inform us of this situation.
> > However, we cannot take any further action
> > until you provide us with the actual connection logs.
>
> He informed them (whinged like a little gurrllll), but did not supply
> complete or useable data.
>
> No indication that Billy had anything whatsoever with the closing of this
> account. After FOUR years, it could have closed for any number of reasons.
>
> A squealing, bleating pig's comments are hardly gonna get anyone's account
> closed. Especially when.....
>
> > Only with this information can we
> > identify the responsible individual.
>
> they couldn't even identify the source of Billy's ire and
> sexual frustration.
>
> Yep.
>
> Loser.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com