Cherokee change in 2000?
A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ engine
in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks Matt |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to
the intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are replacing an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, but you may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you considered a 4.5 L stroker? -- jeff M Warren wrote: > A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ engine > in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the case, and if > so what are the implications / is it something to be concerned about? > Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks > > Matt > > |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to
the intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are replacing an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, but you may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you considered a 4.5 L stroker? -- jeff M Warren wrote: > A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ engine > in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the case, and if > so what are the implications / is it something to be concerned about? > Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks > > Matt > > |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to
the intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are replacing an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, but you may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you considered a 4.5 L stroker? -- jeff M Warren wrote: > A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ engine > in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the case, and if > so what are the implications / is it something to be concerned about? > Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks > > Matt > > |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
Actually, for a change, I am not considering an engine swap, just looking at
an '01 Cherokee and was wondering if there was anything to be concerned about. Matt "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:lpsUg.2287$6S2.1868@trndny02... > They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to the > intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to > emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are replacing > an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, but you > may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you considered > a 4.5 L stroker? > > -- > jeff > > > > M Warren wrote: >> A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ >> engine in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the >> case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be >> concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks >> >> Matt |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
Actually, for a change, I am not considering an engine swap, just looking at
an '01 Cherokee and was wondering if there was anything to be concerned about. Matt "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:lpsUg.2287$6S2.1868@trndny02... > They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to the > intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to > emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are replacing > an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, but you > may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you considered > a 4.5 L stroker? > > -- > jeff > > > > M Warren wrote: >> A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ >> engine in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the >> case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be >> concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks >> >> Matt |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
Actually, for a change, I am not considering an engine swap, just looking at
an '01 Cherokee and was wondering if there was anything to be concerned about. Matt "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:lpsUg.2287$6S2.1868@trndny02... > They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to the > intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to > emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are replacing > an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, but you > may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you considered > a 4.5 L stroker? > > -- > jeff > > > > M Warren wrote: >> A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ >> engine in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the >> case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be >> concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks >> >> Matt |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
The only other change was in the front axle. It was previously a high-pinon
Dana 30, starting in 2000 it was a low-pinon Dana 30. If you don't know the difference, it probably won't matter. HTH Carl "M Warren" <muuarren@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BZBUg.2997$484.2000@twister.nyroc.rr.com... > Actually, for a change, I am not considering an engine swap, just looking > at an '01 Cherokee and was wondering if there was anything to be concerned > about. > > Matt > > "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message > news:lpsUg.2287$6S2.1868@trndny02... >> They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to the >> intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to >> emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are >> replacing an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, >> but you may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you >> considered a 4.5 L stroker? >> >> -- >> jeff >> >> >> >> M Warren wrote: >>> A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ >>> engine in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the >>> case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be >>> concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks >>> >>> Matt > > |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
The only other change was in the front axle. It was previously a high-pinon
Dana 30, starting in 2000 it was a low-pinon Dana 30. If you don't know the difference, it probably won't matter. HTH Carl "M Warren" <muuarren@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BZBUg.2997$484.2000@twister.nyroc.rr.com... > Actually, for a change, I am not considering an engine swap, just looking > at an '01 Cherokee and was wondering if there was anything to be concerned > about. > > Matt > > "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message > news:lpsUg.2287$6S2.1868@trndny02... >> They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to the >> intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to >> emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are >> replacing an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, >> but you may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you >> considered a 4.5 L stroker? >> >> -- >> jeff >> >> >> >> M Warren wrote: >>> A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ >>> engine in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the >>> case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be >>> concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks >>> >>> Matt > > |
Re: Cherokee change in 2000?
The only other change was in the front axle. It was previously a high-pinon
Dana 30, starting in 2000 it was a low-pinon Dana 30. If you don't know the difference, it probably won't matter. HTH Carl "M Warren" <muuarren@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BZBUg.2997$484.2000@twister.nyroc.rr.com... > Actually, for a change, I am not considering an engine swap, just looking > at an '01 Cherokee and was wondering if there was anything to be concerned > about. > > Matt > > "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message > news:lpsUg.2287$6S2.1868@trndny02... >> They went to distributer-less coil on plug, and there were changes to the >> intake manifold (smoother bends) to restore the power they lost to >> emissions detuning. The injectors are different also. If you are >> replacing an older motor you can still use your old distributer and coil, >> but you may need to splice in the injectors plugs and sensors. Have you >> considered a 4.5 L stroker? >> >> -- >> jeff >> >> >> >> M Warren wrote: >>> A friend of mine told me that there was some sort of change to the XJ >>> engine in '00, something to do with the emmisions system. Is this the >>> case, and if so what are the implications / is it something to be >>> concerned about? Looking at an '01 auto with 102k miles. Thanks >>> >>> Matt > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands