Robert Bills

>KQZ4357
> God Bless America, ßill

Hey, that looks like a callsign from one of those ancient CB licenses.

(Had one in the 60's, but can't remember what it was.)

Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA

http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.RobertBills.com

Robert Bills

>KQZ4357
> God Bless America, ßill

Hey, that looks like a callsign from one of those ancient CB licenses.

(Had one in the 60's, but can't remember what it was.)

Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA

http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.RobertBills.com

Robert Bills

>KQZ4357
> God Bless America, ßill

Hey, that looks like a callsign from one of those ancient CB licenses.

(Had one in the 60's, but can't remember what it was.)

Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA

http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.RobertBills.com

Fletcher

I second the corrections that Robert made on my original post. I was
getting tired of posting but wanted to add to the group and not being
specific enough. He is 100% correct. My point is that CB's have their
place, but an amateur radio is a more reliable and more powerful source of
radio communication. Find a local ham club and find out what it takes to
get licensed, it is not that difficult and the ham hobby fits in well with
the jeep hobby. The FCC test is not difficult and is well worth having.


"Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20031122172103.05620.00000814@mb-m13.aol.com...
> >HAM RADIO = <snip> non-licensed people can use the radio under
supervision of
> a licensed ham.
>
> Not exactly. A non-licensed third party is permitted to participate in a
> transmission made for that third party if under the immediate supervision
and
> control of the Control Operator for that station, not just any licensed
ham.
> [FCC rule 97.115]
>
> Also important to know that in case of true emergency
> >anyone can use a ham radio to get assistance.
>
> Also, not exactly. The rules permit a non-licensed person to transmit on
a ham
> station in an emergency situation invilving the immediate safety of human
life
> and protection of property, but only if normal communications systems are
not
> available (i.e., phone, cell phone, CB, etc.). [FCC Rules 97.401-407.]
>
> Moral: Get a Ham license. Its not that hard, and a Ham radio is far more
> effective for obtaining emergency assistance in remote areas than either a
CB
> or a cell phone. Personally, I have all three in my jeep.
>
>
>
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> http://www.RobertBills.com

Fletcher

I second the corrections that Robert made on my original post. I was
getting tired of posting but wanted to add to the group and not being
specific enough. He is 100% correct. My point is that CB's have their
place, but an amateur radio is a more reliable and more powerful source of
radio communication. Find a local ham club and find out what it takes to
get licensed, it is not that difficult and the ham hobby fits in well with
the jeep hobby. The FCC test is not difficult and is well worth having.


"Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20031122172103.05620.00000814@mb-m13.aol.com...
> >HAM RADIO = <snip> non-licensed people can use the radio under
supervision of
> a licensed ham.
>
> Not exactly. A non-licensed third party is permitted to participate in a
> transmission made for that third party if under the immediate supervision
and
> control of the Control Operator for that station, not just any licensed
ham.
> [FCC rule 97.115]
>
> Also important to know that in case of true emergency
> >anyone can use a ham radio to get assistance.
>
> Also, not exactly. The rules permit a non-licensed person to transmit on
a ham
> station in an emergency situation invilving the immediate safety of human
life
> and protection of property, but only if normal communications systems are
not
> available (i.e., phone, cell phone, CB, etc.). [FCC Rules 97.401-407.]
>
> Moral: Get a Ham license. Its not that hard, and a Ham radio is far more
> effective for obtaining emergency assistance in remote areas than either a
CB
> or a cell phone. Personally, I have all three in my jeep.
>
>
>
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> http://www.RobertBills.com

Fletcher

I second the corrections that Robert made on my original post. I was
getting tired of posting but wanted to add to the group and not being
specific enough. He is 100% correct. My point is that CB's have their
place, but an amateur radio is a more reliable and more powerful source of
radio communication. Find a local ham club and find out what it takes to
get licensed, it is not that difficult and the ham hobby fits in well with
the jeep hobby. The FCC test is not difficult and is well worth having.


"Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20031122172103.05620.00000814@mb-m13.aol.com...
> >HAM RADIO = <snip> non-licensed people can use the radio under
supervision of
> a licensed ham.
>
> Not exactly. A non-licensed third party is permitted to participate in a
> transmission made for that third party if under the immediate supervision
and
> control of the Control Operator for that station, not just any licensed
ham.
> [FCC rule 97.115]
>
> Also important to know that in case of true emergency
> >anyone can use a ham radio to get assistance.
>
> Also, not exactly. The rules permit a non-licensed person to transmit on
a ham
> station in an emergency situation invilving the immediate safety of human
life
> and protection of property, but only if normal communications systems are
not
> available (i.e., phone, cell phone, CB, etc.). [FCC Rules 97.401-407.]
>
> Moral: Get a Ham license. Its not that hard, and a Ham radio is far more
> effective for obtaining emergency assistance in remote areas than either a
CB
> or a cell phone. Personally, I have all three in my jeep.
>
>
>
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> http://www.RobertBills.com

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

But if you're rolled over in the boonies, your limiting the number
of people who may respond. You may think you can't get out with a CB,
but I've done it, it takes some convincing to get them to make a long
distance phone call, but I've done it and it saved us a twenty mile
walk. We got the whole Oceanside club to come out a three o'clock in the
morning.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Fletcher wrote:
>
> I second the corrections that Robert made on my original post. I was
> getting tired of posting but wanted to add to the group and not being
> specific enough. He is 100% correct. My point is that CB's have their
> place, but an amateur radio is a more reliable and more powerful source of
> radio communication. Find a local ham club and find out what it takes to
> get licensed, it is not that difficult and the ham hobby fits in well with
> the jeep hobby. The FCC test is not difficult and is well worth having.

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

But if you're rolled over in the boonies, your limiting the number
of people who may respond. You may think you can't get out with a CB,
but I've done it, it takes some convincing to get them to make a long
distance phone call, but I've done it and it saved us a twenty mile
walk. We got the whole Oceanside club to come out a three o'clock in the
morning.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Fletcher wrote:
>
> I second the corrections that Robert made on my original post. I was
> getting tired of posting but wanted to add to the group and not being
> specific enough. He is 100% correct. My point is that CB's have their
> place, but an amateur radio is a more reliable and more powerful source of
> radio communication. Find a local ham club and find out what it takes to
> get licensed, it is not that difficult and the ham hobby fits in well with
> the jeep hobby. The FCC test is not difficult and is well worth having.

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

But if you're rolled over in the boonies, your limiting the number
of people who may respond. You may think you can't get out with a CB,
but I've done it, it takes some convincing to get them to make a long
distance phone call, but I've done it and it saved us a twenty mile
walk. We got the whole Oceanside club to come out a three o'clock in the
morning.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Fletcher wrote:
>
> I second the corrections that Robert made on my original post. I was
> getting tired of posting but wanted to add to the group and not being
> specific enough. He is 100% correct. My point is that CB's have their
> place, but an amateur radio is a more reliable and more powerful source of
> radio communication. Find a local ham club and find out what it takes to
> get licensed, it is not that difficult and the ham hobby fits in well with
> the jeep hobby. The FCC test is not difficult and is well worth having.

CRWLR

Have you ever tried to talk to your friend when he is over 100 yards away?
That's why we have CBs. It isn't for the highway, it's for the trail. A
cellphone won't work in many places where we go wheeling, and the CB is free
to use, unlike the phone minutes. And, with the phone, you have to
constantly dial the damn thing, and you can only talk at one person at a
time, but with a CB, there is no dialing and everybody on the channel hears
you.

Stop bucking the system, for Christ's sake and get yourself a damn radio!
Sheesh.





<ABanks5@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:yyJvb.29688$kL2.16321@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
> Okay this should start a flame, but why the hell do people put CBs in
> Jeeps?!?! I love them and have one in my truck,..but that's only to spot
> cops. If you're in a jeep...especially a CJ,...ya can't hear a damn thing
> anyway and probably aren't going fast enough to get ticketed.
Secondly,..if
> you're on a trail and wheeling, a cell phone would work much better
> OR,...you shouldn't be by yourself in the first place.
> Thoughts?!?!
> Allen
> 83 CJ7
>
>