BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's. At $40.00 more
than BFG's the Goodyear tires lost out to BFG. As a side note I thought
about the Pro Comp MT tire which is very similar in "appearance" to the BFG
MT except the tread blocks are siped making for better rain traction. The
manager at the 4 Wheel Parts place (which owns the Pro-Comp line) advised me
the BFG's last longer and are better off road.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:ca7itf012gb@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:40C71990.A2D7D49B@sympatico.ca...
> > BFG's all the way!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > Handywired wrote:
> > >
> > > Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing
4.10.
> I want
> > > an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy,
> and works
> > > great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
> > >
>
> I had to make this decision last year and went with the BFGs, simply
beacuse
> I've gotten great performance from them on several Jeeps and they were at
> the time a lot less expensive, like $60 a tire for 35s.
>
>
>
than BFG's the Goodyear tires lost out to BFG. As a side note I thought
about the Pro Comp MT tire which is very similar in "appearance" to the BFG
MT except the tread blocks are siped making for better rain traction. The
manager at the 4 Wheel Parts place (which owns the Pro-Comp line) advised me
the BFG's last longer and are better off road.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:ca7itf012gb@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:40C71990.A2D7D49B@sympatico.ca...
> > BFG's all the way!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > Handywired wrote:
> > >
> > > Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing
4.10.
> I want
> > > an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy,
> and works
> > > great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
> > >
>
> I had to make this decision last year and went with the BFGs, simply
beacuse
> I've gotten great performance from them on several Jeeps and they were at
> the time a lot less expensive, like $60 a tire for 35s.
>
>
>
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's. At $40.00 more
than BFG's the Goodyear tires lost out to BFG. As a side note I thought
about the Pro Comp MT tire which is very similar in "appearance" to the BFG
MT except the tread blocks are siped making for better rain traction. The
manager at the 4 Wheel Parts place (which owns the Pro-Comp line) advised me
the BFG's last longer and are better off road.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:ca7itf012gb@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:40C71990.A2D7D49B@sympatico.ca...
> > BFG's all the way!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > Handywired wrote:
> > >
> > > Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing
4.10.
> I want
> > > an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy,
> and works
> > > great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
> > >
>
> I had to make this decision last year and went with the BFGs, simply
beacuse
> I've gotten great performance from them on several Jeeps and they were at
> the time a lot less expensive, like $60 a tire for 35s.
>
>
>
than BFG's the Goodyear tires lost out to BFG. As a side note I thought
about the Pro Comp MT tire which is very similar in "appearance" to the BFG
MT except the tread blocks are siped making for better rain traction. The
manager at the 4 Wheel Parts place (which owns the Pro-Comp line) advised me
the BFG's last longer and are better off road.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:ca7itf012gb@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:40C71990.A2D7D49B@sympatico.ca...
> > BFG's all the way!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > Handywired wrote:
> > >
> > > Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing
4.10.
> I want
> > > an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy,
> and works
> > > great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
> > >
>
> I had to make this decision last year and went with the BFGs, simply
beacuse
> I've gotten great performance from them on several Jeeps and they were at
> the time a lot less expensive, like $60 a tire for 35s.
>
>
>
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's. At $40.00 more
than BFG's the Goodyear tires lost out to BFG. As a side note I thought
about the Pro Comp MT tire which is very similar in "appearance" to the BFG
MT except the tread blocks are siped making for better rain traction. The
manager at the 4 Wheel Parts place (which owns the Pro-Comp line) advised me
the BFG's last longer and are better off road.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:ca7itf012gb@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:40C71990.A2D7D49B@sympatico.ca...
> > BFG's all the way!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > Handywired wrote:
> > >
> > > Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing
4.10.
> I want
> > > an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy,
> and works
> > > great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
> > >
>
> I had to make this decision last year and went with the BFGs, simply
beacuse
> I've gotten great performance from them on several Jeeps and they were at
> the time a lot less expensive, like $60 a tire for 35s.
>
>
>
than BFG's the Goodyear tires lost out to BFG. As a side note I thought
about the Pro Comp MT tire which is very similar in "appearance" to the BFG
MT except the tread blocks are siped making for better rain traction. The
manager at the 4 Wheel Parts place (which owns the Pro-Comp line) advised me
the BFG's last longer and are better off road.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:ca7itf012gb@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:40C71990.A2D7D49B@sympatico.ca...
> > BFG's all the way!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > Handywired wrote:
> > >
> > > Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing
4.10.
> I want
> > > an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy,
> and works
> > > great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
> > >
>
> I had to make this decision last year and went with the BFGs, simply
beacuse
> I've gotten great performance from them on several Jeeps and they were at
> the time a lot less expensive, like $60 a tire for 35s.
>
>
>
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>Subject: Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>Subject: Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>Subject: Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>Subject: Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
>From: "Richard Harris"
>I've heard that Goodyear MT/R's wear out faster than BFG's.
youve heard correct. @19000 miles mine still have a fair amount of life left
in them, but theyre showing a lot more wear than my bfg's of comparable
mileage. i can also state with assurity that the mt/r's are _totally_
unforgiving if you miss a single rotation. still, when its time to buy tires
again ill replace them with mt/r's but only because i like rocks. :-)
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
tires.
If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
Dean
That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
On 09 Jun 2004 08:50:12 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing 4.10. I want
>an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy, and works
>great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
>
>-jeff
well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
tires.
If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
Dean
That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
On 09 Jun 2004 08:50:12 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing 4.10. I want
>an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy, and works
>great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
>
>-jeff
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
tires.
If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
Dean
That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
On 09 Jun 2004 08:50:12 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing 4.10. I want
>an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy, and works
>great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
>
>-jeff
well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
tires.
If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
Dean
That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
On 09 Jun 2004 08:50:12 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing 4.10. I want
>an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy, and works
>great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
>
>-jeff
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
tires.
If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
Dean
That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
On 09 Jun 2004 08:50:12 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing 4.10. I want
>an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy, and works
>great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
>
>-jeff
well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
tires.
If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
Dean
That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
On 09 Jun 2004 08:50:12 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>Size will most likely be 31's, vehicle is a '97 TJ 4.0L. Gearing 4.10. I want
>an aggressive tire that wears well on-road, is not obnoxiously noisy, and works
>great in slick mud and wet snow. Which is better?
>
>-jeff