Ball Joints 01 TJ
05-14-2005, 12:54 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
That is a BMFH.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> 10 lb preferable....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> 10 lb preferable....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
05-14-2005, 08:55 AM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Yes, but it pops those freakin ball joints out soo sweet. ;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
05-14-2005, 08:55 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Yes, but it pops those freakin ball joints out soo sweet. ;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
05-14-2005, 08:55 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Yes, but it pops those freakin ball joints out soo sweet. ;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
05-14-2005, 08:55 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Yes, but it pops those freakin ball joints out soo sweet. ;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> That is a BMFH.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > 10 lb preferable....
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
05-15-2005, 02:03 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Ok well I'm gonna go get a bfh monday, hammer them out, i'm tired of looking
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
05-15-2005, 02:03 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Ok well I'm gonna go get a bfh monday, hammer them out, i'm tired of looking
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
05-15-2005, 02:03 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Ok well I'm gonna go get a bfh monday, hammer them out, i'm tired of looking
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
05-15-2005, 02:03 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
Ok well I'm gonna go get a bfh monday, hammer them out, i'm tired of looking
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
why they gave out so soon?
05-15-2005, 02:14 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ball Joints 01 TJ
You likely will need an axle stand under the lower arm so it sits solid
when you hit it. I would be soaking it with a good penetrating oil as
well.
Good luck!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Troy wrote:
>
> Ok well I'm gonna go get a bfh monday, hammer them out, i'm tired of looking
> for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
>
> Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
> rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
> 15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
> 3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
>
> I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
> out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
> why they gave out so soon?
when you hit it. I would be soaking it with a good penetrating oil as
well.
Good luck!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Troy wrote:
>
> Ok well I'm gonna go get a bfh monday, hammer them out, i'm tired of looking
> for the "proper" tools. Not sure if they exist now.
>
> Well then, since the wheels are off, i measured my backspacing on the
> rims... 4 inches. Can't remember if thats good (4 inch lift 33x12.50's on
> 15x10 rims). I don't rub at full turn. I think I remember something about
> 3 1/2 inches of backspacing should be the way to go? I may be wrong.
>
> I also notice that the lower ball joints are the ones that are really wore
> out, and they didn't have a zerk fitting, the new ones do. Maybe this is
> why they gave out so soon?