AX15 vs. NV3550
10-08-2003, 04:23 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
Found that on my AX15 - 2nd gear was a bit notchy so I replaced the oil at
18,500
(normal oil - no change) and again at 22,000 with dealer oil which cured it
completely.
Schedule B says change every 18K - I think I'll do the next few at 10K as
the oil came
out a bit dirty.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031008122631.12501.00002996@mb-m04.aol.com...
: In article <Cn6dnddev_ECthmiXTWJjg@magma.ca>, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca>
: writes:
:
: >Sorry I did have to ask.
: >I changed the oil on my 01TJ at 60,000Km or 37,000Mi
: >and was quite surprised at the amount of filings on
: >the magnet. I know that filings are normal for a new transmission
: >but it did seem excessive. Unfortunatly I don't have the expereince to
: >compare with other transmissions except my Argo 6X6
: >After changing it with the dealer oil. I was again surprised how much
: >less noise it made. Wish I changed it sooner. In fact I would recommend
: >everyone with the NV3550 to change the oil after the first year or
30,000km.
: >Regards
: >Frank
: >
:
: A friend of mine bought at 2000 TJ used and when he changed the tranny oil
he
: found the same thing.
:
: Interestingly neither my FSM nor the OM list tranny lube change intervals
for
: the 3550.
: * * *
: Matt Macchiarolo
: www.townpeddler.com
: www.wolverine4wd.org
: http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
:
:
:
:
18,500
(normal oil - no change) and again at 22,000 with dealer oil which cured it
completely.
Schedule B says change every 18K - I think I'll do the next few at 10K as
the oil came
out a bit dirty.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031008122631.12501.00002996@mb-m04.aol.com...
: In article <Cn6dnddev_ECthmiXTWJjg@magma.ca>, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca>
: writes:
:
: >Sorry I did have to ask.
: >I changed the oil on my 01TJ at 60,000Km or 37,000Mi
: >and was quite surprised at the amount of filings on
: >the magnet. I know that filings are normal for a new transmission
: >but it did seem excessive. Unfortunatly I don't have the expereince to
: >compare with other transmissions except my Argo 6X6
: >After changing it with the dealer oil. I was again surprised how much
: >less noise it made. Wish I changed it sooner. In fact I would recommend
: >everyone with the NV3550 to change the oil after the first year or
30,000km.
: >Regards
: >Frank
: >
:
: A friend of mine bought at 2000 TJ used and when he changed the tranny oil
he
: found the same thing.
:
: Interestingly neither my FSM nor the OM list tranny lube change intervals
for
: the 3550.
: * * *
: Matt Macchiarolo
: www.townpeddler.com
: www.wolverine4wd.org
: http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
:
:
:
:
10-08-2003, 09:00 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
>consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed back
>in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
>critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered how
>the later ones have held up.
>
>
190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
MTL....
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
>consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed back
>in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
>critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered how
>the later ones have held up.
>
>
190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
MTL....
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
10-08-2003, 09:00 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
>consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed back
>in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
>critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered how
>the later ones have held up.
>
>
190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
MTL....
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
>consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed back
>in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
>critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered how
>the later ones have held up.
>
>
190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
MTL....
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
10-08-2003, 09:00 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
>consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed back
>in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
>critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered how
>the later ones have held up.
>
>
190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
MTL....
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
>consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed back
>in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
>critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered how
>the later ones have held up.
>
>
190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
MTL....
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
10-09-2003, 12:15 AM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
That's great to know. I've been using Redline MTL for years in my '94 and
have been impressed with the performance.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f84b312_1@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
> >consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed
back
> >in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
> >critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered
how
> >the later ones have held up.
> >
> >
>
> 190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
> MTL....
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
have been impressed with the performance.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f84b312_1@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
> >consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed
back
> >in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
> >critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered
how
> >the later ones have held up.
> >
> >
>
> 190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
> MTL....
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
10-09-2003, 12:15 AM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
That's great to know. I've been using Redline MTL for years in my '94 and
have been impressed with the performance.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f84b312_1@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
> >consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed
back
> >in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
> >critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered
how
> >the later ones have held up.
> >
> >
>
> 190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
> MTL....
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
have been impressed with the performance.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f84b312_1@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
> >consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed
back
> >in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
> >critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered
how
> >the later ones have held up.
> >
> >
>
> 190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
> MTL....
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
10-09-2003, 12:15 AM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AX15 vs. NV3550
That's great to know. I've been using Redline MTL for years in my '94 and
have been impressed with the performance.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f84b312_1@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
> >consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed
back
> >in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
> >critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered
how
> >the later ones have held up.
> >
> >
>
> 190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
> MTL....
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
have been impressed with the performance.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f84b312_1@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vo7259o1o3njf8@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >At this point, with many NV3550s running around out there what's the
> >consensus of this trans vs the older AX15? The AX15 was really trashed
back
> >in the early '90's but has apprent;y been robust enough to silence its
> >critics. The NV3550 seems to have had some early problems but I wondered
how
> >the later ones have held up.
> >
> >
>
> 190600 miles on my AX15 and still going on strong with Redline MT-90
> MTL....
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brian Hawke
Jeep Mailing List
12
08-16-2004 09:10 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)