Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
12-19-2005, 06:18 PM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
submarine Aston-Martins...
"Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
> Actually it says:
>
> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>
> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
> commander!
>
> Stephen Gibbs
> 92 XJ
submarine Aston-Martins...
"Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
> Actually it says:
>
> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>
> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
> commander!
>
> Stephen Gibbs
> 92 XJ
12-19-2005, 06:19 PM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Or did I mean MI-6?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:19 PM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Or did I mean MI-6?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:19 PM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Or did I mean MI-6?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:44 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
I thought that was a Lotus model? Shows what I know...
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:44 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
I thought that was a Lotus model? Shows what I know...
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:44 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
I thought that was a Lotus model? Shows what I know...
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:fISdnWUxdfQ9ojreRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Damn. I heard MI-5 was interested in an updated vehicle to replace their
> submarine Aston-Martins...
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
>> Actually it says:
>>
>> "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
>>
>> Honest - and just when I was wanting to buy a black one and be a U-boat
>> commander!
>>
>> Stephen Gibbs
>> 92 XJ
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:50 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Here you go.... I replaced all the "d"s with "ve"s and it makes no sense.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
> We ha"ve" a two term occupant of the White House that re"ve"efine"ve" the
> wor"ve" "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to "ve"eceive"
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or shoul"ve" be.
> .
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in a"ve"verting?
>> Go"ve" Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:LW------3r"ve"@aol.com http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>
>>> I've seen it ...
>>> I wanna go too!
>>> Just think, I coul"ve" forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>
>>> How "ve"o you suppose they navigate? Si"ve"e thrusters?
>>>
>>> Just imagine if one of the ki"ve"s opene"ve" a win"ve"ow.
>>>
>>> KJK
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:r9CdnRThPprVojreRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> Surely that's a typo, I think you meant to type "ve" instead of "d"
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
>> We had a two term occupant of the White House that redefined the word
>> "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to deceive"
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>> .
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen it ...
>>>> I wanna go too!
>>>> Just think, I could forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose they navigate? Side thrusters?
>>>>
>>>> Just imagine if one of the kids opened a window.
>>>>
>>>> KJK
>>
>>
>
>
"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
> We ha"ve" a two term occupant of the White House that re"ve"efine"ve" the
> wor"ve" "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to "ve"eceive"
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or shoul"ve" be.
> .
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in a"ve"verting?
>> Go"ve" Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:LW------3r"ve"@aol.com http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>
>>> I've seen it ...
>>> I wanna go too!
>>> Just think, I coul"ve" forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>
>>> How "ve"o you suppose they navigate? Si"ve"e thrusters?
>>>
>>> Just imagine if one of the ki"ve"s opene"ve" a win"ve"ow.
>>>
>>> KJK
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:r9CdnRThPprVojreRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> Surely that's a typo, I think you meant to type "ve" instead of "d"
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
>> We had a two term occupant of the White House that redefined the word
>> "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to deceive"
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>> .
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen it ...
>>>> I wanna go too!
>>>> Just think, I could forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose they navigate? Side thrusters?
>>>>
>>>> Just imagine if one of the kids opened a window.
>>>>
>>>> KJK
>>
>>
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:50 PM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Here you go.... I replaced all the "d"s with "ve"s and it makes no sense.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
> We ha"ve" a two term occupant of the White House that re"ve"efine"ve" the
> wor"ve" "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to "ve"eceive"
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or shoul"ve" be.
> .
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in a"ve"verting?
>> Go"ve" Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:LW------3r"ve"@aol.com http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>
>>> I've seen it ...
>>> I wanna go too!
>>> Just think, I coul"ve" forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>
>>> How "ve"o you suppose they navigate? Si"ve"e thrusters?
>>>
>>> Just imagine if one of the ki"ve"s opene"ve" a win"ve"ow.
>>>
>>> KJK
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:r9CdnRThPprVojreRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> Surely that's a typo, I think you meant to type "ve" instead of "d"
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
>> We had a two term occupant of the White House that redefined the word
>> "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to deceive"
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>> .
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen it ...
>>>> I wanna go too!
>>>> Just think, I could forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose they navigate? Side thrusters?
>>>>
>>>> Just imagine if one of the kids opened a window.
>>>>
>>>> KJK
>>
>>
>
>
"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
> We ha"ve" a two term occupant of the White House that re"ve"efine"ve" the
> wor"ve" "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to "ve"eceive"
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or shoul"ve" be.
> .
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in a"ve"verting?
>> Go"ve" Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:LW------3r"ve"@aol.com http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>
>>> I've seen it ...
>>> I wanna go too!
>>> Just think, I coul"ve" forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>
>>> How "ve"o you suppose they navigate? Si"ve"e thrusters?
>>>
>>> Just imagine if one of the ki"ve"s opene"ve" a win"ve"ow.
>>>
>>> KJK
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:r9CdnRThPprVojreRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> Surely that's a typo, I think you meant to type "ve" instead of "d"
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
>> We had a two term occupant of the White House that redefined the word
>> "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to deceive"
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>> .
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen it ...
>>>> I wanna go too!
>>>> Just think, I could forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose they navigate? Side thrusters?
>>>>
>>>> Just imagine if one of the kids opened a window.
>>>>
>>>> KJK
>>
>>
>
>
12-19-2005, 06:50 PM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Here you go.... I replaced all the "d"s with "ve"s and it makes no sense.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
> We ha"ve" a two term occupant of the White House that re"ve"efine"ve" the
> wor"ve" "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to "ve"eceive"
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or shoul"ve" be.
> .
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in a"ve"verting?
>> Go"ve" Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:LW------3r"ve"@aol.com http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>
>>> I've seen it ...
>>> I wanna go too!
>>> Just think, I coul"ve" forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>
>>> How "ve"o you suppose they navigate? Si"ve"e thrusters?
>>>
>>> Just imagine if one of the ki"ve"s opene"ve" a win"ve"ow.
>>>
>>> KJK
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:r9CdnRThPprVojreRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> Surely that's a typo, I think you meant to type "ve" instead of "d"
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
>> We had a two term occupant of the White House that redefined the word
>> "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to deceive"
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>> .
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen it ...
>>>> I wanna go too!
>>>> Just think, I could forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose they navigate? Side thrusters?
>>>>
>>>> Just imagine if one of the kids opened a window.
>>>>
>>>> KJK
>>
>>
>
>
"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
> We ha"ve" a two term occupant of the White House that re"ve"efine"ve" the
> wor"ve" "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to "ve"eceive"
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or shoul"ve" be.
> .
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in a"ve"verting?
>> Go"ve" Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:LW------3r"ve"@aol.com http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>
>>> I've seen it ...
>>> I wanna go too!
>>> Just think, I coul"ve" forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>
>>> How "ve"o you suppose they navigate? Si"ve"e thrusters?
>>>
>>> Just imagine if one of the ki"ve"s opene"ve" a win"ve"ow.
>>>
>>> KJK
>
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:r9CdnRThPprVojreRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> Surely that's a typo, I think you meant to type "ve" instead of "d"
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:30a8c$43a5f5b3$4831b233$8485@FUSE.NET...
>> We had a two term occupant of the White House that redefined the word
>> "truth" to mean "any communication given with the intent to deceive"
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>> .
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
>>> I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen it ...
>>>> I wanna go too!
>>>> Just think, I could forget packing my regulator next vacation.
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose they navigate? Side thrusters?
>>>>
>>>> Just imagine if one of the kids opened a window.
>>>>
>>>> KJK
>>
>>
>
>