Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
: I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
You ol spoil sport.
Ok, so now, if I bought one, and went out into the ocean to look at fish,
and it sunk and I nearly drowned
How much do you suppose it would be good for?
You KNOW this is going to happen, right?
Has anyone looked at one of these?
They aren't much. If you raise the back seat, you cant see out the rear
window. When you open the gate, if you aren't careful to jump back, it will
decapitate you.
The only redeemingquality I saw was the vents in the dash, something with
full control.
KJK
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43A5E06B.697A8A2A@***.net...
: I remember the Lincoln one. What happen to truth in adverting?
You ol spoil sport.
Ok, so now, if I bought one, and went out into the ocean to look at fish,
and it sunk and I nearly drowned
How much do you suppose it would be good for?
You KNOW this is going to happen, right?
Has anyone looked at one of these?
They aren't much. If you raise the back seat, you cant see out the rear
window. When you open the gate, if you aren't careful to jump back, it will
decapitate you.
The only redeemingquality I saw was the vents in the dash, something with
full control.
KJK
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0I6dnRI8jMhBczjenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@ez2.net...
: You guys missed the part about, "Closed course with professional drivers,
DO
: NOT try this at home."
I wasn't gonna try it at home, I was going to take it to the pacific coast.
I could just drive on in at the jetty in Monterey and cruise on down the
coast line a ways.
Maybe visit the few wrecks in the bay and go to the marine sanctuary at
Point Lobos.....
that's nowhere NEAR home!
KJK
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0I6dnRI8jMhBczjenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@ez2.net...
: You guys missed the part about, "Closed course with professional drivers,
DO
: NOT try this at home."
I wasn't gonna try it at home, I was going to take it to the pacific coast.
I could just drive on in at the jetty in Monterey and cruise on down the
coast line a ways.
Maybe visit the few wrecks in the bay and go to the marine sanctuary at
Point Lobos.....
that's nowhere NEAR home!
KJK
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0I6dnRI8jMhBczjenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@ez2.net...
: You guys missed the part about, "Closed course with professional drivers,
DO
: NOT try this at home."
I wasn't gonna try it at home, I was going to take it to the pacific coast.
I could just drive on in at the jetty in Monterey and cruise on down the
coast line a ways.
Maybe visit the few wrecks in the bay and go to the marine sanctuary at
Point Lobos.....
that's nowhere NEAR home!
KJK
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
I believe the shysters would claim it was "an implied warranty" that the
vehicle could be used as a submersible as it is advertised as such the
barely readable disclaimer withstanding.
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:QXqpf.57854$cA2.24586@bignews3.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
> : Actually it says:
> :
> : "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
> :
>
>
> rats!
>
>
vehicle could be used as a submersible as it is advertised as such the
barely readable disclaimer withstanding.
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:QXqpf.57854$cA2.24586@bignews3.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
> : Actually it says:
> :
> : "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
> :
>
>
> rats!
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone seen the Commander Commercial?
I believe the shysters would claim it was "an implied warranty" that the
vehicle could be used as a submersible as it is advertised as such the
barely readable disclaimer withstanding.
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:QXqpf.57854$cA2.24586@bignews3.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
> : Actually it says:
> :
> : "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
> :
>
>
> rats!
>
>
vehicle could be used as a submersible as it is advertised as such the
barely readable disclaimer withstanding.
--
Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
..
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:QXqpf.57854$cA2.24586@bignews3.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Stephen Gibbs" <blu.skink@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:sdopf.5512$7f3.5171@trnddc01...
> : Actually it says:
> :
> : "Fictionalization: Vehicle not suitable for underwater use"
> :
>
>
> rats!
>
>