anyone read this?? true? untrue?
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
Or was it our basic "supply and demand" theory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand which drives our economy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
mcalister wrote:
>
> L.W.
> Reread your post, it makes no sense. Looks like some idiots
> must have graduated from our schools in the past as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand which drives our economy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
mcalister wrote:
>
> L.W.
> Reread your post, it makes no sense. Looks like some idiots
> must have graduated from our schools in the past as well.
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
Or was it our basic "supply and demand" theory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand which drives our economy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
mcalister wrote:
>
> L.W.
> Reread your post, it makes no sense. Looks like some idiots
> must have graduated from our schools in the past as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand which drives our economy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
mcalister wrote:
>
> L.W.
> Reread your post, it makes no sense. Looks like some idiots
> must have graduated from our schools in the past as well.
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
Or was it our basic "supply and demand" theory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand which drives our economy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
mcalister wrote:
>
> L.W.
> Reread your post, it makes no sense. Looks like some idiots
> must have graduated from our schools in the past as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand which drives our economy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
mcalister wrote:
>
> L.W.
> Reread your post, it makes no sense. Looks like some idiots
> must have graduated from our schools in the past as well.
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:18:26 GMT, "Pi-eyed Piper" <no@way.com> wrote:
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:18:26 GMT, "Pi-eyed Piper" <no@way.com> wrote:
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:18:26 GMT, "Pi-eyed Piper" <no@way.com> wrote:
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:18:26 GMT, "Pi-eyed Piper" <no@way.com> wrote:
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
>http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
Dean
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
And the amount of bullsh*t about it:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
Right up there with the biofuel scams.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dean wrote:
>
> My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
>
> There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
> their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
> water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
> vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
>
> OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
> economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
> past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
> according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
> ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
> it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
>
> What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
> the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
> you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
>
> But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
>
> Dean
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
Right up there with the biofuel scams.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dean wrote:
>
> My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
>
> There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
> their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
> water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
> vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
>
> OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
> economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
> past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
> according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
> ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
> it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
>
> What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
> the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
> you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
>
> But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
>
> Dean
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
And the amount of bullsh*t about it:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
Right up there with the biofuel scams.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dean wrote:
>
> My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
>
> There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
> their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
> water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
> vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
>
> OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
> economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
> past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
> according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
> ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
> it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
>
> What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
> the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
> you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
>
> But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
>
> Dean
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
Right up there with the biofuel scams.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dean wrote:
>
> My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
>
> There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
> their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
> water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
> vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
>
> OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
> economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
> past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
> according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
> ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
> it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
>
> What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
> the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
> you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
>
> But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
>
> Dean
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
And the amount of bullsh*t about it:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
Right up there with the biofuel scams.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dean wrote:
>
> My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
>
> There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
> their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
> water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
> vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
>
> OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
> economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
> past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
> according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
> ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
> it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
>
> What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
> the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
> you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
>
> But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
>
> Dean
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
Right up there with the biofuel scams.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dean wrote:
>
> My finely tuned BS meter pegged on this one, what a load! <rotflmao>
>
> There are so many area that just make me laugh, like "sluggish with respect to
> their natural frequency." What are we talking about here, laxatives? <lol> Or
> water reaching 300 degrees before boiling. What does that have to do with
> vaporizing fuel in a modern engine?
>
> OK but let's pick one thing and pick it , like a 15 to 35% increase in fuel
> economy. The author suggests that the unburned fuel goes out the tail pipe or
> past the rings into the oil. Assuming that a vehicle is running efficiently,
> according to this author 15% of every gallon is wasted, or about 19
> ounces/gallon, well over a pint. Using the same calculations for a 35% increase
> it turns out to be about 45 ounces/gallon, well over a quart.
>
> What do you guys think, you dumping from one pint to one quart of raw fuel into
> the oil and out the tail pipe for every gallon of gas you burn? Think about it,
> you'd smell raw gas every time you drove your Jeep.
>
> But it is on the internet so it must be true. ;-)
>
> Dean