anyone read this?? true? untrue?
04-12-2005, 05:52 PM
#101
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
He'd be more like an older brother to you, but the two of you are like peas
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
04-13-2005, 01:48 PM
#102
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
Matt's dad said:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
volt battery.
I'll make a fortune.
04-13-2005, 01:48 PM
#103
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
Matt's dad said:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
volt battery.
I'll make a fortune.
04-13-2005, 01:48 PM
#104
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
Matt's dad said:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
volt battery.
I'll make a fortune.
04-13-2005, 01:48 PM
#105
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
Matt's dad said:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
volt battery.
I'll make a fortune.
04-13-2005, 07:04 PM
#106
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:48:37 -0400, Lee Ayrton <layrton@panix.com>
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
04-13-2005, 07:04 PM
#107
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:48:37 -0400, Lee Ayrton <layrton@panix.com>
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
04-13-2005, 07:04 PM
#108
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:48:37 -0400, Lee Ayrton <layrton@panix.com>
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
04-13-2005, 07:04 PM
#109
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:48:37 -0400, Lee Ayrton <layrton@panix.com>
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>
>When asked about Internet claims that acetone extends gas mileage,
>Matt's dad said:
>
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>
>Thanks for doing that, Matt, and a tip-o-the hat to your dad. I now
>remember that acetone was the main ingredient in my ex-wife's nail
>polish remover, so injector cleaning seems likely.
>
>Poking around the URL I find that it is a loaded with woohoo perpetual
>motion devices, ambient air-powered turbine heater/cooling units and
>"gravity motors" -- which should give a good indication of how
>reasonable the idea is. My favorite was the "Brown's/Rhode's gas" --
>you split water into mixed oxygen and hydrogen and then use the gas to
>neutralize radioactive waste, cut titanium, turn feldspar into moonstone
>or heal wounds, and the only by byproduct of combustion is new water!
>
>Me, Im going to start marketing a pyramid-shaped magnetic air cleaner
>that will boost power by 35%, increase mileage by 17% and reduce
>greenhouse gasses by up to 69%, and it will be powered by a simple 9
>volt battery.
>
>I'll make a fortune.
Yeah, but don't forget the tinfoil beanie for safety or else it'll act
as an antenna for mind control transmissions and beam them directly to
your brain!
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
04-15-2005, 05:37 PM
#110
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:psadnWWYHb7mt8bfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>
>>Dad's a retired chemical engineer, I fwd'd the link to him, and will post
>>his comments.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Dad,
> Seeme to me, if this works, they would already be doing it..
>
> http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
>
> Dad
>
>
From what I read farther down the page in the 'update' section, the
author recently did reverse trials without the acetone and with each
tank filled up from half-full, the mileage dropped accordingly.
Also, Throttle Body Fuel Injection _does_ require vaporisation. Not as
much as a carb, but the throttle body is a long way from the cumbustion
chamber to just throw liquid into it and exect it to vaporise by itself.
I've seen dirty TB injectors in my Chevy 4.3 V6 shoot streams of gas
into the body and the engine ran like crap. Clean out those needles in
the TBI and it can fix it right up. Direct injection of course, just
blows fuel right into the cylinders (or a lot closer to them) than TBI.
I suspect (like the replyer's Dad) that acetone did have something to do
with cleaning the injectors, and that can make a HUGE difference in
mileage, power and everything else the engine puts out.
Cheers,
- Jeff G
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:psadnWWYHb7mt8bfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>
>>Dad's a retired chemical engineer, I fwd'd the link to him, and will post
>>his comments.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Dad,
> Seeme to me, if this works, they would already be doing it..
>
> http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
>
> Dad
>
>
From what I read farther down the page in the 'update' section, the
author recently did reverse trials without the acetone and with each
tank filled up from half-full, the mileage dropped accordingly.
Also, Throttle Body Fuel Injection _does_ require vaporisation. Not as
much as a carb, but the throttle body is a long way from the cumbustion
chamber to just throw liquid into it and exect it to vaporise by itself.
I've seen dirty TB injectors in my Chevy 4.3 V6 shoot streams of gas
into the body and the engine ran like crap. Clean out those needles in
the TBI and it can fix it right up. Direct injection of course, just
blows fuel right into the cylinders (or a lot closer to them) than TBI.
I suspect (like the replyer's Dad) that acetone did have something to do
with cleaning the injectors, and that can make a HUGE difference in
mileage, power and everything else the engine puts out.
Cheers,
- Jeff G