anyone read this?? true? untrue?
04-12-2005, 04:28 PM
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:psadnWWYHb7mt8bfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> Dad's a retired chemical engineer, I fwd'd the link to him, and will post
> his comments.
>
Dad,
Seeme to me, if this works, they would already be doing it..
http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
Comments?
Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
was clean the injectors.
Love,
Dad
04-12-2005, 04:28 PM
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:psadnWWYHb7mt8bfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> Dad's a retired chemical engineer, I fwd'd the link to him, and will post
> his comments.
>
Dad,
Seeme to me, if this works, they would already be doing it..
http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
Comments?
Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
was clean the injectors.
Love,
Dad
04-12-2005, 04:28 PM
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:psadnWWYHb7mt8bfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> Dad's a retired chemical engineer, I fwd'd the link to him, and will post
> his comments.
>
Dad,
Seeme to me, if this works, they would already be doing it..
http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/
Comments?
Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
was clean the injectors.
Love,
Dad
04-12-2005, 04:48 PM
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
04-12-2005, 04:48 PM
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
04-12-2005, 04:48 PM
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
04-12-2005, 04:48 PM
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone worked
> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did not
> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
> was clean the injectors.
>
> Love,
>
> Dad
04-12-2005, 05:52 PM
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
He'd be more like an older brother to you, but the two of you are like peas
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
04-12-2005, 05:52 PM
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
He'd be more like an older brother to you, but the two of you are like peas
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
04-12-2005, 05:52 PM
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: anyone read this?? true? untrue?
He'd be more like an older brother to you, but the two of you are like peas
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
in a pod...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:425C343B.F61A6F75@***.net...
> I wish my Dad were still here, can I barrow yours?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense! With fuel injectors, vaporization is not an issue. Acetone
>> worked
>> in those trials because it cleaned dirty injectors, I suspect. They did
>> not
>> finish the experiment, properly. To be valid, they should have run fuel
>> efficiency trials , again without acetone, to see if what they really did
>> was clean the injectors.
>>
>> Love,
>>
>> Dad
