almost stolen!
12-23-2003, 09:26 PM
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
it should be...
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-B8B5D7.20053723122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <vj6Gb.17053$Pg1.7624@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
> "Terry Jeffrey" <twjeffrey@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>
> No, it's not.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-B8B5D7.20053723122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <vj6Gb.17053$Pg1.7624@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
> "Terry Jeffrey" <twjeffrey@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>
> No, it's not.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
12-23-2003, 09:26 PM
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
it should be...
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-B8B5D7.20053723122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <vj6Gb.17053$Pg1.7624@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
> "Terry Jeffrey" <twjeffrey@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>
> No, it's not.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-B8B5D7.20053723122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <vj6Gb.17053$Pg1.7624@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
> "Terry Jeffrey" <twjeffrey@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>
> No, it's not.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
12-23-2003, 09:27 PM
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
didn't we go over all this just a few weeks ago???
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net>
> wrote:
>
> > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot
> > someone trespassing on your property after dark.
>
> No. Trespassing is not enough.
>
> TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49
>
> PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
> justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or
> tangible, movable property:
> (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
> Section 9.41; and
> (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
> force is immediately necessary:
> (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
> robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
> mischief during the nighttime; or
> (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
> from escaping with the property; and
> (3) he reasonably believes that:
> (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
> any other means; or
> (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
> the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
> risk of death or serious bodily injury.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net>
> wrote:
>
> > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot
> > someone trespassing on your property after dark.
>
> No. Trespassing is not enough.
>
> TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49
>
> PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
> justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or
> tangible, movable property:
> (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
> Section 9.41; and
> (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
> force is immediately necessary:
> (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
> robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
> mischief during the nighttime; or
> (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
> from escaping with the property; and
> (3) he reasonably believes that:
> (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
> any other means; or
> (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
> the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
> risk of death or serious bodily injury.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
12-23-2003, 09:27 PM
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
didn't we go over all this just a few weeks ago???
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net>
> wrote:
>
> > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot
> > someone trespassing on your property after dark.
>
> No. Trespassing is not enough.
>
> TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49
>
> PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
> justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or
> tangible, movable property:
> (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
> Section 9.41; and
> (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
> force is immediately necessary:
> (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
> robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
> mischief during the nighttime; or
> (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
> from escaping with the property; and
> (3) he reasonably believes that:
> (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
> any other means; or
> (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
> the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
> risk of death or serious bodily injury.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net>
> wrote:
>
> > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot
> > someone trespassing on your property after dark.
>
> No. Trespassing is not enough.
>
> TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49
>
> PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
> justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or
> tangible, movable property:
> (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
> Section 9.41; and
> (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
> force is immediately necessary:
> (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
> robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
> mischief during the nighttime; or
> (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
> from escaping with the property; and
> (3) he reasonably believes that:
> (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
> any other means; or
> (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
> the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
> risk of death or serious bodily injury.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
12-23-2003, 09:27 PM
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
didn't we go over all this just a few weeks ago???
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net>
> wrote:
>
> > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot
> > someone trespassing on your property after dark.
>
> No. Trespassing is not enough.
>
> TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49
>
> PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
> justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or
> tangible, movable property:
> (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
> Section 9.41; and
> (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
> force is immediately necessary:
> (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
> robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
> mischief during the nighttime; or
> (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
> from escaping with the property; and
> (3) he reasonably believes that:
> (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
> any other means; or
> (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
> the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
> risk of death or serious bodily injury.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net>
> wrote:
>
> > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot
> > someone trespassing on your property after dark.
>
> No. Trespassing is not enough.
>
> TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49
>
> PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
> justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or
> tangible, movable property:
> (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
> Section 9.41; and
> (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
> force is immediately necessary:
> (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
> robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
> mischief during the nighttime; or
> (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
> from escaping with the property; and
> (3) he reasonably believes that:
> (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
> any other means; or
> (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
> the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
> risk of death or serious bodily injury.
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
12-23-2003, 09:31 PM
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
Joe did pass the time by typing:
> "Jeepers" wrote ...
>>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote:
>>
>>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>>
>> No, it's not.
> it should be...
(double check but this used to be
the Texas law on use of Deadly Force)
"Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes
deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft
during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one
who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library
--
DougW
> "Jeepers" wrote ...
>>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote:
>>
>>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>>
>> No, it's not.
> it should be...
(double check but this used to be
the Texas law on use of Deadly Force)
"Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes
deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft
during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one
who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library
--
DougW
12-23-2003, 09:31 PM
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
Joe did pass the time by typing:
> "Jeepers" wrote ...
>>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote:
>>
>>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>>
>> No, it's not.
> it should be...
(double check but this used to be
the Texas law on use of Deadly Force)
"Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes
deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft
during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one
who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library
--
DougW
> "Jeepers" wrote ...
>>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote:
>>
>>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>>
>> No, it's not.
> it should be...
(double check but this used to be
the Texas law on use of Deadly Force)
"Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes
deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft
during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one
who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library
--
DougW
12-23-2003, 09:31 PM
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
Joe did pass the time by typing:
> "Jeepers" wrote ...
>>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote:
>>
>>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>>
>> No, it's not.
> it should be...
(double check but this used to be
the Texas law on use of Deadly Force)
"Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes
deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft
during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one
who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library
--
DougW
> "Jeepers" wrote ...
>>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote:
>>
>>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX.
>>
>> No, it's not.
> it should be...
(double check but this used to be
the Texas law on use of Deadly Force)
"Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes
deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft
during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one
who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library
--
DougW
12-23-2003, 09:43 PM
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
In article <sP6Gb.6794$IM3.2500@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
> it should be...
That's a different story. Some people are alive only because it's
illegal to kill them.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
> it should be...
That's a different story. Some people are alive only because it's
illegal to kill them.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
12-23-2003, 09:43 PM
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: almost stolen!
In article <sP6Gb.6794$IM3.2500@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
> it should be...
That's a different story. Some people are alive only because it's
illegal to kill them.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
> it should be...
That's a different story. Some people are alive only because it's
illegal to kill them.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----