85 to 89 Octane Update
09-06-2007, 06:55 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
> highways....
>
> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
> alignment and tune up....
>
> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>
>
>
I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
can buy.
Just my .02
Spdloader
09-06-2007, 06:55 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
> highways....
>
> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
> alignment and tune up....
>
> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>
>
>
I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
can buy.
Just my .02
Spdloader
09-06-2007, 06:55 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
> highways....
>
> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
> alignment and tune up....
>
> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>
>
>
I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
can buy.
Just my .02
Spdloader
09-06-2007, 09:54 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
09-06-2007, 09:54 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
09-06-2007, 09:54 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
09-06-2007, 09:54 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
....and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:40 -0400, "Spdloader"
<askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mindy" <drranchtx@nospamearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:13e0abf9ggega2e@corp.supernews.com...
>> to follow up my last post, I refilled my 2001 Grand with 89 octane gas
>> rather than the cheapest gas of 85....there was a good differance in the
>> mountain pass lanes, I had more power to keep up with the speed limit and
>> even passed others on Interstate 70....maybe a bad tank of 85 but still I
>> will go with the 89 till I get down out of the 8 to 10,000 ft range of
>> highways....
>>
>> I did the usual pretrip maintence, new airfilter, oil change , new tires &
>> alignment and tune up....
>>
>> thanks to all for your input, even Bill... : )
>>
>>
>>
>I always run the highest octane I can get. Starts better, runs better,
>better fuel mileage, cleaner intake and injectors over the long haul, and
>only about $6 to $8 dollars more per tankfull. Better than any additive I
>can buy.
>
>Just my .02
>
>Spdloader
>
09-06-2007, 10:29 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
<98XJ> wrote in message news:fcb1e3dceebt19lj30kmhn0v3lltlb95rj@4ax.com...
> With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
> on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
> into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
> my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
> to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
>
> ...and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
>
lol
Spdloader
09-06-2007, 10:29 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
<98XJ> wrote in message news:fcb1e3dceebt19lj30kmhn0v3lltlb95rj@4ax.com...
> With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
> on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
> into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
> my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
> to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
>
> ...and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
>
lol
Spdloader
09-06-2007, 10:29 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 85 to 89 Octane Update
<98XJ> wrote in message news:fcb1e3dceebt19lj30kmhn0v3lltlb95rj@4ax.com...
> With other cars (never a problem with my XJ), when I have had pinging
> on a full tank of gas, I have added a few mothballs (nitrobenzene)
> into the tank. It has not shown any harm to the engines of several of
> my own or other family members' cars/trucks, and some permanently cut
> to a lower-than-reccommended octane by adding a few at each fill-up.
>
> ...and their woolen seat covers seem to last longer, too.
>
lol
Spdloader