76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
02-29-2004, 05:15 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the CJ?
> Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> RPM's?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the CJ?
> Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> RPM's?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
02-29-2004, 05:15 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the CJ?
> Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> RPM's?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the CJ?
> Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> RPM's?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
02-29-2004, 05:15 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the CJ?
> Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> RPM's?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the CJ?
> Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> RPM's?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
02-29-2004, 05:51 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
interstate.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
CJ?
> > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> > RPM's?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
02-29-2004, 05:51 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
interstate.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
CJ?
> > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> > RPM's?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
02-29-2004, 05:51 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
interstate.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
CJ?
> > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact low
> > RPM's?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
02-29-2004, 08:05 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
I'm in Florida. So, there's no inspection. I don't intend to rely on
(0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
FL:)
Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
at idle?
Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> > The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> > not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> > stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> > little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> > pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> > that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> > going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
>
> Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
> entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
> interstate.
>
>
>
>
>
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Drink wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
> CJ?
> > > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact
low
> > > RPM's?
> > > o_o_o_o
> > > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
>
>
(0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
FL:)
Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
at idle?
Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> > The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> > not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> > stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> > little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> > pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> > that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> > going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
>
> Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
> entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
> interstate.
>
>
>
>
>
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Drink wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
> CJ?
> > > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact
low
> > > RPM's?
> > > o_o_o_o
> > > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
>
>
02-29-2004, 08:05 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
I'm in Florida. So, there's no inspection. I don't intend to rely on
(0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
FL:)
Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
at idle?
Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> > The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> > not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> > stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> > little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> > pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> > that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> > going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
>
> Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
> entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
> interstate.
>
>
>
>
>
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Drink wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
> CJ?
> > > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact
low
> > > RPM's?
> > > o_o_o_o
> > > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
>
>
(0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
FL:)
Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
at idle?
Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> > The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> > not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> > stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> > little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> > pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> > that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> > going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
>
> Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
> entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
> interstate.
>
>
>
>
>
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Drink wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
> CJ?
> > > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact
low
> > > RPM's?
> > > o_o_o_o
> > > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
>
>
02-29-2004, 08:05 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
I'm in Florida. So, there's no inspection. I don't intend to rely on
(0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
FL:)
Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
at idle?
Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> > The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> > not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> > stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> > little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> > pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> > that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> > going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
>
> Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
> entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
> interstate.
>
>
>
>
>
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Drink wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
> CJ?
> > > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact
low
> > > RPM's?
> > > o_o_o_o
> > > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
>
>
(0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
FL:)
Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
at idle?
Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4042646C.4574B768@***.net...
> > The number one question is, do you have to pass SMOG. Because your
> > not going to with the valve overlap ram super charging design of the
> > stock sixties cam. Your idle will probably be a bout 600 to 700 like the
> > little house wife of the sixties as they wouldn't have wanted to be
> > pulled around via their automatic transmissions either. Ask the guy
> > that's selling you the cam, s/he won't steer you wrong. If you are only
> > going to crawl over rocks, tell them that.
>
> Absolutely! If you are planning on idling over obsitcles, you will want an
> entirely different cam than if you intend to blaze a new groove down the
> interstate.
>
>
>
>
>
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Drink wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, Bill. You really recommend 290deg cam for the
> CJ?
> > > Sounds like a full-race application. How much loss will that impact
low
> > > RPM's?
> > > o_o_o_o
> > > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
>
>
02-29-2004, 08:52 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 76 258 CJ-7 Camshaft specifications
Yup, just like the '64 Rambler engine. 270 degrees is the stock
grind for the TJ's 4.0 liter. Anything more than nine to one will not
run on today's pump gas. Thank God for leaded aviation fuel.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm in Florida. So, there's no inspection. I don't intend to rely on
> (0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
> FL:)
> Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
> will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
> requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
> binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
> All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
> what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
> at idle?
> Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
> "CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
> news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
grind for the TJ's 4.0 liter. Anything more than nine to one will not
run on today's pump gas. Thank God for leaded aviation fuel.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm in Florida. So, there's no inspection. I don't intend to rely on
> (0-throttle) idle to navigate obstacles since we don't have rocks in north
> FL:)
> Bill, you say that a 290deg cam will idle at 600-700RPM and I'm sure it
> will. My concern's that the Clifford site lists multiple
> requirements/preferences for that grind, i.e. aftermarket springs to prevent
> binding, 650cfm 4Bbl, 10:1 compression pistons, 4.0 head conversion, etc.
> All in all, a full race cam. I think I'm leaning toward the 272deg cam but
> what do you think about a 280deg cam with Rhoades lifters to retard it a bit
> at idle?
> Anybody have any experience with Rhoades lifters? How's this setup sound?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
> "CRWLR" <CRWLRJEFF@YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
> news:1044r8q1getmrf5@corp.supernews.com...
