arvin

I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?
--
2CJs '82 258 CJ-7 O|||||||O
http://arvin.homestead.com/files/websignature.jpg
http://users.mo-net.com/arvin

me

>I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
>they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?

I felt it was a let down..

me

>I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
>they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?

I felt it was a let down..

me

>I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
>they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?

I felt it was a let down..

James

"arvin" <arvinnospam@mo-net.com> wrote in message
news:103gblbraphr167@corp.supernews.com...
> I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
> they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?

I like mine, I think it sounds good. I am not an audiophile though. If you
are a big car audio person you probably won't like it.

James

"arvin" <arvinnospam@mo-net.com> wrote in message
news:103gblbraphr167@corp.supernews.com...
> I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
> they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?

I like mine, I think it sounds good. I am not an audiophile though. If you
are a big car audio person you probably won't like it.

James

"arvin" <arvinnospam@mo-net.com> wrote in message
news:103gblbraphr167@corp.supernews.com...
> I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy that
> they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?

I like mine, I think it sounds good. I am not an audiophile though. If you
are a big car audio person you probably won't like it.

j carter

Verrrry cheap-sounding, boomy lows with probably no actual response below
about 100hz. BIG disappointment.


"James" <me@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:gT%Zb.29321$tM5.9869@fed1read04...
>
> "arvin" <arvinnospam@mo-net.com> wrote in message
> news:103gblbraphr167@corp.supernews.com...
> > I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy
that
> > they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?
>
> I like mine, I think it sounds good. I am not an audiophile though. If
you
> are a big car audio person you probably won't like it.
>
>

j carter

Verrrry cheap-sounding, boomy lows with probably no actual response below
about 100hz. BIG disappointment.


"James" <me@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:gT%Zb.29321$tM5.9869@fed1read04...
>
> "arvin" <arvinnospam@mo-net.com> wrote in message
> news:103gblbraphr167@corp.supernews.com...
> > I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy
that
> > they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?
>
> I like mine, I think it sounds good. I am not an audiophile though. If
you
> are a big car audio person you probably won't like it.
>
>

j carter

Verrrry cheap-sounding, boomy lows with probably no actual response below
about 100hz. BIG disappointment.


"James" <me@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:gT%Zb.29321$tM5.9869@fed1read04...
>
> "arvin" <arvinnospam@mo-net.com> wrote in message
> news:103gblbraphr167@corp.supernews.com...
> > I've heard lots of negative feedback on this option. Is anyone happy
that
> > they have this or is it generally accepted it was a let down?
>
> I like mine, I think it sounds good. I am not an audiophile though. If
you
> are a big car audio person you probably won't like it.
>
>