Hello! What year/model do you have with that Command-Trac?

"Bowgus" <bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<HcKAc.342024$Ar.137531@twister01.bloor.is.ne t.cable.rogers.com>...
> I like my Command-Trac ... let's me 2 wheel it most of the time which saves
> a bit on gas ... with the 4H there on demand for snow, rain, gravel. A note
> on the 4 low ... not selectable on the fly ... from what I've read the
> majority of us have to select neutral before selecting/deselecting 4L. And I
> like my lockup 4 spd auto for smooth trailer pulling and saving a bit on
> fuel. And I like that 4.0 litre HO ... a bit of performance/torque. And it's
> light ... 3100 lbs ... with that uniframe or whatever it's called. And ... I
> find the open differentials work just fine. Still going strong at 240,000 km
> ... oh yeah, had to replace the starter last week ... got to the point where
> I had to whack it to get it to work ... and the cost was only $188 cdn at
> the dealers ... about half what I was expecting.

 

Hello! What year/model do you have with that Command-Trac?

"Bowgus" <bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<HcKAc.342024$Ar.137531@twister01.bloor.is.ne t.cable.rogers.com>...
> I like my Command-Trac ... let's me 2 wheel it most of the time which saves
> a bit on gas ... with the 4H there on demand for snow, rain, gravel. A note
> on the 4 low ... not selectable on the fly ... from what I've read the
> majority of us have to select neutral before selecting/deselecting 4L. And I
> like my lockup 4 spd auto for smooth trailer pulling and saving a bit on
> fuel. And I like that 4.0 litre HO ... a bit of performance/torque. And it's
> light ... 3100 lbs ... with that uniframe or whatever it's called. And ... I
> find the open differentials work just fine. Still going strong at 240,000 km
> ... oh yeah, had to replace the starter last week ... got to the point where
> I had to whack it to get it to work ... and the cost was only $188 cdn at
> the dealers ... about half what I was expecting.

 

Hello! What year/model do you have with that Command-Trac?

"Bowgus" <bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<HcKAc.342024$Ar.137531@twister01.bloor.is.ne t.cable.rogers.com>...
> I like my Command-Trac ... let's me 2 wheel it most of the time which saves
> a bit on gas ... with the 4H there on demand for snow, rain, gravel. A note
> on the 4 low ... not selectable on the fly ... from what I've read the
> majority of us have to select neutral before selecting/deselecting 4L. And I
> like my lockup 4 spd auto for smooth trailer pulling and saving a bit on
> fuel. And I like that 4.0 litre HO ... a bit of performance/torque. And it's
> light ... 3100 lbs ... with that uniframe or whatever it's called. And ... I
> find the open differentials work just fine. Still going strong at 240,000 km
> ... oh yeah, had to replace the starter last week ... got to the point where
> I had to whack it to get it to work ... and the cost was only $188 cdn at
> the dealers ... about half what I was expecting.

 

>Hmmmmm...tough call...97 thru 99 for the drivetrain, but pre-97 for
>non-cheap parts...probably better to stick with the better drivetrain,
>etc. ?
I don't know much about the drivetrain, so I'll defer to the judgement of
others. And although older parts might be built better, they are older parts.
My metal bumper is starting to rust and will need touching up in a year or so.

Another thing you might do is compare the interiors of the older vs newer ones
and see if you have a strong prefference. The difference is not subtle. The
older ones have a more boxy, truck-like look, the newer ones are more rounded,
like modern cars. With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
windows but noticably improved many of the minor controls...

--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>

 

>Hmmmmm...tough call...97 thru 99 for the drivetrain, but pre-97 for
>non-cheap parts...probably better to stick with the better drivetrain,
>etc. ?
I don't know much about the drivetrain, so I'll defer to the judgement of
others. And although older parts might be built better, they are older parts.
My metal bumper is starting to rust and will need touching up in a year or so.

Another thing you might do is compare the interiors of the older vs newer ones
and see if you have a strong prefference. The difference is not subtle. The
older ones have a more boxy, truck-like look, the newer ones are more rounded,
like modern cars. With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
windows but noticably improved many of the minor controls...

--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>

 

>Hmmmmm...tough call...97 thru 99 for the drivetrain, but pre-97 for
>non-cheap parts...probably better to stick with the better drivetrain,
>etc. ?
I don't know much about the drivetrain, so I'll defer to the judgement of
others. And although older parts might be built better, they are older parts.
My metal bumper is starting to rust and will need touching up in a year or so.

Another thing you might do is compare the interiors of the older vs newer ones
and see if you have a strong prefference. The difference is not subtle. The
older ones have a more boxy, truck-like look, the newer ones are more rounded,
like modern cars. With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
windows but noticably improved many of the minor controls...

--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>

 

>Hmmmmm...tough call...97 thru 99 for the drivetrain, but pre-97 for
>non-cheap parts...probably better to stick with the better drivetrain,
>etc. ?
I don't know much about the drivetrain, so I'll defer to the judgement of
others. And although older parts might be built better, they are older parts.
My metal bumper is starting to rust and will need touching up in a year or so.

Another thing you might do is compare the interiors of the older vs newer ones
and see if you have a strong prefference. The difference is not subtle. The
older ones have a more boxy, truck-like look, the newer ones are more rounded,
like modern cars. With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
windows but noticably improved many of the minor controls...

--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>

 

Monte Castleman wrote:
> With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
> windows

And a good thing they did. Those vent windows leak on the front corner.
I think there was a service bulletin on it.

Steve

 

Monte Castleman wrote:
> With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
> windows

And a good thing they did. Those vent windows leak on the front corner.
I think there was a service bulletin on it.

Steve

 

Monte Castleman wrote:
> With the newer ones, they took away the swing open vent
> windows

And a good thing they did. Those vent windows leak on the front corner.
I think there was a service bulletin on it.

Steve