L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III

Hi Earle,
Did they know you were racing?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:----------@----------.com
http://www.----------.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

"Earle Horton" <0123456@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:fn3vgr$bcn$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> I passed a CJ7 once and a Grand another time. It's a fairly high-revving
> engine compared with the six cylinder, and you have to hit the shift
points
> just right. :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "Greg" <greglc84@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:niVkj.61004$wx.27182@pd7urf1no...
> > My daughter has a 95 4 cyl, 4.88 gears and 33"s, she has no problem,
road
> > trip through the rockys she was passed by all, but off road as Mike
says,
> > you wouldn't know any difference, 95 has the 297 U-joints in the front
> > too.
> >
> > "griffin" <gryffy@WEEEEshaw.ca> wrote in message
> > news:3FQkj.58335$wx.14548@pd7urf1no...
> >> Got a lead on a cheap '95 YJ with the 4-banger. Does this have enough
> >> power
> >> to modify into a "beast" - i.e. to put a 4" skyjacker lift and some 35"
> >> muds?
> >>
> >> The Jeep is cheap enough that putting a small V8 or I6 wouldn't be too
> >> detrimental to the wallet but I don't want to bother with the work -
not
> >> to
> >> mention this engine only has 140k.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

nrs

On Jan 21, 12:24 pm, Will Honea <who...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> nrs wrote:
> > On Jan 20, 5:18 pm, "griffin" <gry...@WEEEEshaw.ca> wrote:
> >> Got a lead on a cheap '95 YJ with the 4-banger. Does this have enough
> >> power to modify into a "beast" - i.e. to put a 4" skyjacker lift and some
> >> 35" muds?
>
> >> The Jeep is cheap enough that putting a small V8 or I6 wouldn't be too
> >> detrimental to the wallet but I don't want to bother with the work - not
> >> to mention this engine only has 140k.
>
> > The gearing is the key. I have a '95 YJ and they work well with 33
> > inch tires on road since the gear selection is limited to 4.88 max. I
> > think 35 would be a bit much with 4.88 gears on road but would be OK
> > off road in low range. If you plan to swap in another engine
> > eventually I would say go ahead and start building it for 35s, it will
> > work out fine. There are other options for lower gearing off road,
> > like a 4:1 kit, Atlas transfer case or tranny swap. Have fun with
> > your build!
>
> My only thought here: how you gonna keep axles in that D35 rear end with all
> that weight on the end of the shaft - looks like gearing can only go so far
> before you exceed strength of the underlying hardware, no matter how puny
> the engine. Let one tire hop and you walk home.
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That is true. I was just referring to the gearing. I swapped in a
rear D44 and will keep it at or below 33s as long as the stock 2.5 is
in it. For 35s, the OP should swap in stronger axles, a rear D44 at
least and even stronger axles with a powerful engine swapped in.

That being said there is a local jeeper (2.5 L YJ) who runs 35s with a
stock D35 with a lockright and has not broken the original shafts in
several years of use. He does not avoid tough obstacles and his jeep
is fairly extreme with SOA, z-boxes, and revolver shackles. I can't
figure out why it works so well for him.

Mike Romain

nrs wrote:
> On Jan 21, 12:24 pm, Will Honea <who...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> nrs wrote:
>>> On Jan 20, 5:18 pm, "griffin" <gry...@WEEEEshaw.ca> wrote:
>>>> Got a lead on a cheap '95 YJ with the 4-banger. Does this have enough
>>>> power to modify into a "beast" - i.e. to put a 4" skyjacker lift and some
>>>> 35" muds?
>>>> The Jeep is cheap enough that putting a small V8 or I6 wouldn't be too
>>>> detrimental to the wallet but I don't want to bother with the work - not
>>>> to mention this engine only has 140k.
>>> The gearing is the key. I have a '95 YJ and they work well with 33
>>> inch tires on road since the gear selection is limited to 4.88 max. I
>>> think 35 would be a bit much with 4.88 gears on road but would be OK
>>> off road in low range. If you plan to swap in another engine
>>> eventually I would say go ahead and start building it for 35s, it will
>>> work out fine. There are other options for lower gearing off road,
>>> like a 4:1 kit, Atlas transfer case or tranny swap. Have fun with
>>> your build!
>> My only thought here: how you gonna keep axles in that D35 rear end with all
>> that weight on the end of the shaft - looks like gearing can only go so far
>> before you exceed strength of the underlying hardware, no matter how puny
>> the engine. Let one tire hop and you walk home.
>>
>> --
>> Will Honea
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> That is true. I was just referring to the gearing. I swapped in a
> rear D44 and will keep it at or below 33s as long as the stock 2.5 is
> in it. For 35s, the OP should swap in stronger axles, a rear D44 at
> least and even stronger axles with a powerful engine swapped in.
>
> That being said there is a local jeeper (2.5 L YJ) who runs 35s with a
> stock D35 with a lockright and has not broken the original shafts in
> several years of use. He does not avoid tough obstacles and his jeep
> is fairly extreme with SOA, z-boxes, and revolver shackles. I can't
> figure out why it works so well for him.

That is a power and torque and traction thing. The 4 banger just
doesn't have the oomph to snap things easy if you get a little twitchy
on the gas pedal. Get twitchy with a V8 and lots of thing can break.
If I get twitchy on my 258, I will literally shatter engine mounts
because my 33x9.5's just 'don't want to spin up.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
'New' frame in the works for '08. Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com

L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III

35" tires, lets see now, what's are words I'm looking for? Oh, I know,
it's HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:----------@----------.com
http://www.----------.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

"griffin" <gryffy@WEEEEshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3FQkj.58335$wx.14548@pd7urf1no...
> Got a lead on a cheap '95 YJ with the 4-banger. Does this have enough
power
> to modify into a "beast" - i.e. to put a 4" skyjacker lift and some 35"
> muds?
>
> The Jeep is cheap enough that putting a small V8 or I6 wouldn't be too
> detrimental to the wallet but I don't want to bother with the work - not
to
> mention this engine only has 140k.
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Terry Dactille©~®

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:28:53 -0800, "------------------------ III"
<----------@----------.com> wrote:

>Hi Earle,
> Did they know you were racing?
> Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:----------@----------.com
> http://www.----------.com/jeep_bookmark.htm
>

Here's how it's done, right from ------.

Message-ID: <46e20731$0$16353$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

Sincerely,
Llewellyn W. (Bill) ------ III

If you were ever in business, you would realize there are
guidelines the
Internal Revenue Service go by, percentages to profit. any one of the
hundreds categories could flag the account. I really can't remember
switch
percentages were a problem, other than upon showing the local office
those
receipts, satisfied them. My bookkeeper would warn me about the amount
of
money I was writing off on my company truck, which were really my
Jeeps and Hot Rods, sponsoring the station, but the IRS never burned
me. Like Leona Helmsley went to jail for painting her bathroom and
writing it off to her motels.
Thanks for proving I'm right, you're a useless freeloader on
welfare. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/