4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
I am absolutely certain. Even used a calculator. Used the trip odometer.
Stock tire size, so it should be correct. Miles divided by gallons used.
But I am running the 2.4 liter engine.
Anyone else running a 2.4? What king of mpg are they reporting?
Bryan
"ElAlumbrado" <elNOSPAMalumbrado@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:95a53$424aec4f$943f9512$27800@STARBAND.NET...
> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>
> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around town,
> 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been consistent
> since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
>
Stock tire size, so it should be correct. Miles divided by gallons used.
But I am running the 2.4 liter engine.
Anyone else running a 2.4? What king of mpg are they reporting?
Bryan
"ElAlumbrado" <elNOSPAMalumbrado@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:95a53$424aec4f$943f9512$27800@STARBAND.NET...
> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>
> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around town,
> 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been consistent
> since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
>
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
I am absolutely certain. Even used a calculator. Used the trip odometer.
Stock tire size, so it should be correct. Miles divided by gallons used.
But I am running the 2.4 liter engine.
Anyone else running a 2.4? What king of mpg are they reporting?
Bryan
"ElAlumbrado" <elNOSPAMalumbrado@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:95a53$424aec4f$943f9512$27800@STARBAND.NET...
> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>
> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around town,
> 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been consistent
> since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
>
Stock tire size, so it should be correct. Miles divided by gallons used.
But I am running the 2.4 liter engine.
Anyone else running a 2.4? What king of mpg are they reporting?
Bryan
"ElAlumbrado" <elNOSPAMalumbrado@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:95a53$424aec4f$943f9512$27800@STARBAND.NET...
> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>
> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around town,
> 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been consistent
> since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
>
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
I am absolutely certain. Even used a calculator. Used the trip odometer.
Stock tire size, so it should be correct. Miles divided by gallons used.
But I am running the 2.4 liter engine.
Anyone else running a 2.4? What king of mpg are they reporting?
Bryan
"ElAlumbrado" <elNOSPAMalumbrado@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:95a53$424aec4f$943f9512$27800@STARBAND.NET...
> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>
> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around town,
> 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been consistent
> since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
>
Stock tire size, so it should be correct. Miles divided by gallons used.
But I am running the 2.4 liter engine.
Anyone else running a 2.4? What king of mpg are they reporting?
Bryan
"ElAlumbrado" <elNOSPAMalumbrado@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:95a53$424aec4f$943f9512$27800@STARBAND.NET...
> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>
> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around town,
> 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been consistent
> since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
>
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:424B0E25.4F736DFF@sympatico.ca...
> Just a thought guys, I have heard of differences like that before and I
> think the type of air filter might have had a bearing somehow. Some
> have a foam piece and some don't.
>
> Just curious if your mileage differences might have to do with the air
> filters?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> ElAlumbrado wrote:
>>
>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> > I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>>
>> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
>> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around
>> town, 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been
>> consistent since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:424B0E25.4F736DFF@sympatico.ca...
> Just a thought guys, I have heard of differences like that before and I
> think the type of air filter might have had a bearing somehow. Some
> have a foam piece and some don't.
>
> Just curious if your mileage differences might have to do with the air
> filters?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> ElAlumbrado wrote:
>>
>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> > I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>>
>> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
>> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around
>> town, 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been
>> consistent since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:424B0E25.4F736DFF@sympatico.ca...
> Just a thought guys, I have heard of differences like that before and I
> think the type of air filter might have had a bearing somehow. Some
> have a foam piece and some don't.
>
> Just curious if your mileage differences might have to do with the air
> filters?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> ElAlumbrado wrote:
>>
>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> > I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>>
>> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
>> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around
>> town, 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been
>> consistent since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:424B0E25.4F736DFF@sympatico.ca...
> Just a thought guys, I have heard of differences like that before and I
> think the type of air filter might have had a bearing somehow. Some
> have a foam piece and some don't.
>
> Just curious if your mileage differences might have to do with the air
> filters?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> ElAlumbrado wrote:
>>
>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> > I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>>
>> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
>> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around
>> town, 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been
>> consistent since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:424B0E25.4F736DFF@sympatico.ca...
> Just a thought guys, I have heard of differences like that before and I
> think the type of air filter might have had a bearing somehow. Some
> have a foam piece and some don't.
>
> Just curious if your mileage differences might have to do with the air
> filters?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> ElAlumbrado wrote:
>>
>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> > I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>>
>> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
>> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around
>> town, 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been
>> consistent since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:424B0E25.4F736DFF@sympatico.ca...
> Just a thought guys, I have heard of differences like that before and I
> think the type of air filter might have had a bearing somehow. Some
> have a foam piece and some don't.
>
> Just curious if your mileage differences might have to do with the air
> filters?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> ElAlumbrado wrote:
>>
>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> > I don't know, Nate. My '95 with a 2.5 regularly gets about 21.
>>
>> Are you guys talking about 4-cylinder Wranglers????? I have a 4-banger
>> 2000 Wrangler (manual) that has *never* done better than 17. Around
>> town, 12 is normal with 15 highway on a good day. Mileage has been
>> consistent since new (now 45K). 21 mpg??? You sure?
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
Drive no faster than fifty five.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Paw wrote:
>
> I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
> checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Paw wrote:
>
> I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
> checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
Drive no faster than fifty five.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Paw wrote:
>
> I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
> checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Paw wrote:
>
> I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
> checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
Drive no faster than fifty five.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Paw wrote:
>
> I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
> checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Paw wrote:
>
> I remember that posting a bit back Mike - ran out to the TJ (4.0) and
> checked - alas no foam piece... still the crappy 15mpg though :))
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 cyl. mileage, lift & tire size
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:424B1947.B4BFB204@***.net...
> Drive no faster than fifty five.
I can't speak for others, but my 4-banger won't go much faster than 55
(well, I have managed to scrape my way up to 70 from time-to-time, but
the Jeep ain't happy about it).
news:424B1947.B4BFB204@***.net...
> Drive no faster than fifty five.
I can't speak for others, but my 4-banger won't go much faster than 55
(well, I have managed to scrape my way up to 70 from time-to-time, but
the Jeep ain't happy about it).