I'll second this Nathan......
dave

"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for the
> 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light, and
> thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> into how awesome it is off road.
> i like:
> 30" - 3.73
> 31"/32" - 4.10
> 33" - 4.56
> 35" - 4.88
> 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
> "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me; I'm
> > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
maybe
> > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
don't
> > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> >
> > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> >
> > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> >
> > -jeff
>
>

 

I run 4.56 and 31's in an automatic. It is actually reasonable on the
highway. I like it. I imagine 4.10 would be perfect.
KH

"dæve" <dzins@Dor.state.wi.usMYUGLYSISTER> wrote in message
news:Lx9ub.195589$Te.1413197@news.easynews.com...
> I'll second this Nathan......
> dave
>
> "Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
> news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> > my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for
the
> > 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light,
and
> > thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> > into how awesome it is off road.
> > i like:
> > 30" - 3.73
> > 31"/32" - 4.10
> > 33" - 4.56
> > 35" - 4.88
> > 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
>

 

I run 4.56 and 31's in an automatic. It is actually reasonable on the
highway. I like it. I imagine 4.10 would be perfect.
KH

"dæve" <dzins@Dor.state.wi.usMYUGLYSISTER> wrote in message
news:Lx9ub.195589$Te.1413197@news.easynews.com...
> I'll second this Nathan......
> dave
>
> "Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
> news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> > my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for
the
> > 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light,
and
> > thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> > into how awesome it is off road.
> > i like:
> > 30" - 3.73
> > 31"/32" - 4.10
> > 33" - 4.56
> > 35" - 4.88
> > 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
>

 

I run 4.56 and 31's in an automatic. It is actually reasonable on the
highway. I like it. I imagine 4.10 would be perfect.
KH

"dæve" <dzins@Dor.state.wi.usMYUGLYSISTER> wrote in message
news:Lx9ub.195589$Te.1413197@news.easynews.com...
> I'll second this Nathan......
> dave
>
> "Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
> news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> > my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for
the
> > 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light,
and
> > thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> > into how awesome it is off road.
> > i like:
> > 30" - 3.73
> > 31"/32" - 4.10
> > 33" - 4.56
> > 35" - 4.88
> > 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
>

 

While on the subject, My '03 sport with the D44 and 3.73's seems to
work well with the stock 30x9.5 GSA's (get stuck anywhere?- not yet).
Anyway, I will soon be making the move to 31x10.5, probably AT KO's.
Thoughts? Too much tire for the 3.73?

Thanks,

John



"Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<bp5me20hih@enews1.newsguy.com>...
> PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that to
> 4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
> more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
> heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
> 35's later on.
>
> I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
> them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
> for 4.88's & 35's.
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> > In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> > <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
> >
> > >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> > >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
> >
> > The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
> on the
> > 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
> on a
> > TJ is 3.07.
> > * * *
> > Matt Macchiarolo
> > www.townpeddler.com
> > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> >
> >
> >
> >

 

While on the subject, My '03 sport with the D44 and 3.73's seems to
work well with the stock 30x9.5 GSA's (get stuck anywhere?- not yet).
Anyway, I will soon be making the move to 31x10.5, probably AT KO's.
Thoughts? Too much tire for the 3.73?

Thanks,

John



"Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<bp5me20hih@enews1.newsguy.com>...
> PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that to
> 4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
> more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
> heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
> 35's later on.
>
> I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
> them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
> for 4.88's & 35's.
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> > In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> > <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
> >
> > >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> > >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
> >
> > The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
> on the
> > 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
> on a
> > TJ is 3.07.
> > * * *
> > Matt Macchiarolo
> > www.townpeddler.com
> > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> >
> >
> >
> >

 

While on the subject, My '03 sport with the D44 and 3.73's seems to
work well with the stock 30x9.5 GSA's (get stuck anywhere?- not yet).
Anyway, I will soon be making the move to 31x10.5, probably AT KO's.
Thoughts? Too much tire for the 3.73?

Thanks,

John



"Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<bp5me20hih@enews1.newsguy.com>...
> PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that to
> 4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
> more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
> heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
> 35's later on.
>
> I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
> them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
> for 4.88's & 35's.
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> > In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> > <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
> >
> > >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> > >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
> >
> > The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
> on the
> > 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
> on a
> > TJ is 3.07.
> > * * *
> > Matt Macchiarolo
> > www.townpeddler.com
> > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> >
> >
> >
> >

 

3.73 axel ratio with 31 x 10.5 x15 BFG AT's works very well. I have that on
my '02 TJ.

Tom

"John R" <john_r357@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:77ac046e.0311180434.3a4acb29@posting.google.c om...
> While on the subject, My '03 sport with the D44 and 3.73's seems to
> work well with the stock 30x9.5 GSA's (get stuck anywhere?- not yet).
> Anyway, I will soon be making the move to 31x10.5, probably AT KO's.
> Thoughts? Too much tire for the 3.73?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:<bp5me20hih@enews1.newsguy.com>...
> > PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that
to
> > 4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to
no
> > more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
> > heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of
running
> > 35's later on.
> >
> > I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
> > them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I
opted
> > for 4.88's & 35's.
> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> > news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> > > In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> > > <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
> > >
> > > >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end,
your
> > > >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
> > >
> > > The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available
only
> > on the
> > > 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of
available
> > on a
> > > TJ is 3.07.
> > > * * *
> > > Matt Macchiarolo
> > > www.townpeddler.com
> > > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

 

3.73 axel ratio with 31 x 10.5 x15 BFG AT's works very well. I have that on
my '02 TJ.

Tom

"John R" <john_r357@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:77ac046e.0311180434.3a4acb29@posting.google.c om...
> While on the subject, My '03 sport with the D44 and 3.73's seems to
> work well with the stock 30x9.5 GSA's (get stuck anywhere?- not yet).
> Anyway, I will soon be making the move to 31x10.5, probably AT KO's.
> Thoughts? Too much tire for the 3.73?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:<bp5me20hih@enews1.newsguy.com>...
> > PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that
to
> > 4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to
no
> > more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
> > heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of
running
> > 35's later on.
> >
> > I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
> > them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I
opted
> > for 4.88's & 35's.
> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> > news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> > > In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> > > <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
> > >
> > > >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end,
your
> > > >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
> > >
> > > The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available
only
> > on the
> > > 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of
available
> > on a
> > > TJ is 3.07.
> > > * * *
> > > Matt Macchiarolo
> > > www.townpeddler.com
> > > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

 

3.73 axel ratio with 31 x 10.5 x15 BFG AT's works very well. I have that on
my '02 TJ.

Tom

"John R" <john_r357@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:77ac046e.0311180434.3a4acb29@posting.google.c om...
> While on the subject, My '03 sport with the D44 and 3.73's seems to
> work well with the stock 30x9.5 GSA's (get stuck anywhere?- not yet).
> Anyway, I will soon be making the move to 31x10.5, probably AT KO's.
> Thoughts? Too much tire for the 3.73?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:<bp5me20hih@enews1.newsguy.com>...
> > PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that
to
> > 4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to
no
> > more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
> > heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of
running
> > 35's later on.
> >
> > I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
> > them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I
opted
> > for 4.88's & 35's.
> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> > news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> > > In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> > > <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
> > >
> > > >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end,
your
> > > >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
> > >
> > > The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available
only
> > on the
> > > 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of
available
> > on a
> > > TJ is 3.07.
> > > * * *
> > > Matt Macchiarolo
> > > www.townpeddler.com
> > > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >