3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
02-04-2004, 10:26 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
I've never had a problem in Texas either, Evan.
Evan wrote:
> I took mine off in Texas and did not have a problem.
>
> That doses not make it the law could have been a dumb inspector. But still no
> problem.
>
>
> 83 CJ 8, a work in progress
> http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
> Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Evan wrote:
> I took mine off in Texas and did not have a problem.
>
> That doses not make it the law could have been a dumb inspector. But still no
> problem.
>
>
> 83 CJ 8, a work in progress
> http://hometown.aol.com/ebmvi/MyTJindex.html
> Take out the "XXX" to e-mail me
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
02-05-2004, 04:57 AM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:38:17 GMT, JVC <shady360@NOSPAMoptonline.net>
wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
>brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
>somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
>will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
>would be great.
>
>TIA,
>
>Jay
Never had a problem with not having one on my YJ. My wife has a '93
XJ that didn't come with one from the factory.
That being said...do any of you guys that took your's off want to get
rid of that ugly thing laying aroung the garage?
--
Old Crow
'82 Shovelhead FLT 92" 'Pearl'
'95 Jeep YJ Rio Grande
ASE Certified Master Auto Tech + L1
TOMKAT, BS#133, SENS, MAMBM, DOF#51
wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
>brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
>somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
>will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
>would be great.
>
>TIA,
>
>Jay
Never had a problem with not having one on my YJ. My wife has a '93
XJ that didn't come with one from the factory.
That being said...do any of you guys that took your's off want to get
rid of that ugly thing laying aroung the garage?
--
Old Crow
'82 Shovelhead FLT 92" 'Pearl'
'95 Jeep YJ Rio Grande
ASE Certified Master Auto Tech + L1
TOMKAT, BS#133, SENS, MAMBM, DOF#51
02-05-2004, 04:57 AM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:38:17 GMT, JVC <shady360@NOSPAMoptonline.net>
wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
>brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
>somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
>will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
>would be great.
>
>TIA,
>
>Jay
Never had a problem with not having one on my YJ. My wife has a '93
XJ that didn't come with one from the factory.
That being said...do any of you guys that took your's off want to get
rid of that ugly thing laying aroung the garage?
--
Old Crow
'82 Shovelhead FLT 92" 'Pearl'
'95 Jeep YJ Rio Grande
ASE Certified Master Auto Tech + L1
TOMKAT, BS#133, SENS, MAMBM, DOF#51
wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
>brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
>somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
>will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
>would be great.
>
>TIA,
>
>Jay
Never had a problem with not having one on my YJ. My wife has a '93
XJ that didn't come with one from the factory.
That being said...do any of you guys that took your's off want to get
rid of that ugly thing laying aroung the garage?
--
Old Crow
'82 Shovelhead FLT 92" 'Pearl'
'95 Jeep YJ Rio Grande
ASE Certified Master Auto Tech + L1
TOMKAT, BS#133, SENS, MAMBM, DOF#51
02-05-2004, 04:57 AM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:38:17 GMT, JVC <shady360@NOSPAMoptonline.net>
wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
>brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
>somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
>will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
>would be great.
>
>TIA,
>
>Jay
Never had a problem with not having one on my YJ. My wife has a '93
XJ that didn't come with one from the factory.
That being said...do any of you guys that took your's off want to get
rid of that ugly thing laying aroung the garage?
--
Old Crow
'82 Shovelhead FLT 92" 'Pearl'
'95 Jeep YJ Rio Grande
ASE Certified Master Auto Tech + L1
TOMKAT, BS#133, SENS, MAMBM, DOF#51
wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
>brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
>somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
>will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
>would be great.
>
>TIA,
>
>Jay
Never had a problem with not having one on my YJ. My wife has a '93
XJ that didn't come with one from the factory.
That being said...do any of you guys that took your's off want to get
rid of that ugly thing laying aroung the garage?
--
Old Crow
'82 Shovelhead FLT 92" 'Pearl'
'95 Jeep YJ Rio Grande
ASE Certified Master Auto Tech + L1
TOMKAT, BS#133, SENS, MAMBM, DOF#51
02-05-2004, 12:55 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Dean wrote:
> I'm in Utah and haven't had the 3rd brake for a couple of years and never failed
> the state safety inspection. The first time I went in for inspection after I
> removed the 3rd brake light I held my breath, fearing they would fail me for not
> having it. But, my thought was that if I failed for not having the light I'd
> put one on, other wise I wasn't going to worry about it.
>
> I don't know about NJ but in Utah if you fail the inspection you have to fix the
> problem and then they'll pass you. So go get the inspection, if it fails for
> not having the 3rd brake, so be it. But if it passes you've saved the head ache
> of fixing something you didn't need to.
>
> Dean
> Here's what by back end looks like ;-)
> http://www.monograms-inc.com/jeep/bu...view-2-big.jpg
>
>
>
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:38:17 GMT, JVC <shady360@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
> >brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
> >somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
> >will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
> >would be great.
> >
> >TIA,
> >
> >Jay
>
>
02-05-2004, 12:55 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Dean wrote:
> I'm in Utah and haven't had the 3rd brake for a couple of years and never failed
> the state safety inspection. The first time I went in for inspection after I
> removed the 3rd brake light I held my breath, fearing they would fail me for not
> having it. But, my thought was that if I failed for not having the light I'd
> put one on, other wise I wasn't going to worry about it.
>
> I don't know about NJ but in Utah if you fail the inspection you have to fix the
> problem and then they'll pass you. So go get the inspection, if it fails for
> not having the 3rd brake, so be it. But if it passes you've saved the head ache
> of fixing something you didn't need to.
>
> Dean
> Here's what by back end looks like ;-)
> http://www.monograms-inc.com/jeep/bu...view-2-big.jpg
>
>
>
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:38:17 GMT, JVC <shady360@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
> >brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
> >somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
> >will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
> >would be great.
> >
> >TIA,
> >
> >Jay
>
>
02-05-2004, 12:55 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Dean wrote:
> I'm in Utah and haven't had the 3rd brake for a couple of years and never failed
> the state safety inspection. The first time I went in for inspection after I
> removed the 3rd brake light I held my breath, fearing they would fail me for not
> having it. But, my thought was that if I failed for not having the light I'd
> put one on, other wise I wasn't going to worry about it.
>
> I don't know about NJ but in Utah if you fail the inspection you have to fix the
> problem and then they'll pass you. So go get the inspection, if it fails for
> not having the 3rd brake, so be it. But if it passes you've saved the head ache
> of fixing something you didn't need to.
>
> Dean
> Here's what by back end looks like ;-)
> http://www.monograms-inc.com/jeep/bu...view-2-big.jpg
>
>
>
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:38:17 GMT, JVC <shady360@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know if there is a state or federal law requiring a 3rd
> >brake light? Has anyone purchased a rear bumper/tire carrier combo and
> >somehow mounted their 3rd brake light to it?? I have a feeling they
> >will flunk me at inspection here in Jersey if I don't have it. Any help
> >would be great.
> >
> >TIA,
> >
> >Jay
>
>
02-05-2004, 02:12 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
That wouldn't have been forgotten here in Kalifornia:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Lee Aryan wrote:
>
> I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
> horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
> it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
> emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
> complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
> plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Lee Aryan wrote:
>
> I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
> horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
> it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
> emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
> complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
> plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
02-05-2004, 02:12 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
That wouldn't have been forgotten here in Kalifornia:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Lee Aryan wrote:
>
> I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
> horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
> it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
> emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
> complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
> plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Lee Aryan wrote:
>
> I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
> horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
> it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
> emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
> complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
> plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
02-05-2004, 02:12 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3rd Brake Light on Tire Carrier??
That wouldn't have been forgotten here in Kalifornia:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Lee Aryan wrote:
>
> I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
> horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
> it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
> emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
> complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
> plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Lee Aryan wrote:
>
> I think that the rule of thumb is: If it is not a punch-list item (like
> horn, wipers and parking brakes) and it is there for the inspector to see,
> it must work. In many jurisdictions that seems to be the case for older
> emissions controls. Here in Connecticut no emissions inspector has
> complained that my AIR pump, along with the air rail and all associated
> plumbing, is missing on my `79 CJ-5.
