32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Here we see Bill running a 2WD CJ3A Dune Buggy...but at least it's a
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Here we see Bill running a 2WD CJ3A Dune Buggy...but at least it's a
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Here we see Bill running a 2WD CJ3A Dune Buggy...but at least it's a
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Here we see Bill running a 2WD CJ3A Dune Buggy...but at least it's a
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Real Jeep! :)
Shaggie wrote:
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Yup, the rear are 36" and the front are 32" there not much traction
in our dry sand, so we don't feel the difference in ratios. But this
time I'm forced to play in two wheel drive as you see the slip joint
hanging down from another removed broken driveshaft.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Shaggie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
>
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
>
> --
>
> Less drivel, more Dremel.
> Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
> and furthermore always carry a small snake.
> - W.C. Fields
in our dry sand, so we don't feel the difference in ratios. But this
time I'm forced to play in two wheel drive as you see the slip joint
hanging down from another removed broken driveshaft.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Shaggie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
>
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
>
> --
>
> Less drivel, more Dremel.
> Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
> and furthermore always carry a small snake.
> - W.C. Fields
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Yup, the rear are 36" and the front are 32" there not much traction
in our dry sand, so we don't feel the difference in ratios. But this
time I'm forced to play in two wheel drive as you see the slip joint
hanging down from another removed broken driveshaft.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Shaggie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
>
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
>
> --
>
> Less drivel, more Dremel.
> Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
> and furthermore always carry a small snake.
> - W.C. Fields
in our dry sand, so we don't feel the difference in ratios. But this
time I'm forced to play in two wheel drive as you see the slip joint
hanging down from another removed broken driveshaft.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Shaggie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
>
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
>
> --
>
> Less drivel, more Dremel.
> Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
> and furthermore always carry a small snake.
> - W.C. Fields
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 32's on an unlifted TJ for a while?
Yup, the rear are 36" and the front are 32" there not much traction
in our dry sand, so we don't feel the difference in ratios. But this
time I'm forced to play in two wheel drive as you see the slip joint
hanging down from another removed broken driveshaft.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Shaggie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
>
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
>
> --
>
> Less drivel, more Dremel.
> Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
> and furthermore always carry a small snake.
> - W.C. Fields
in our dry sand, so we don't feel the difference in ratios. But this
time I'm forced to play in two wheel drive as you see the slip joint
hanging down from another removed broken driveshaft.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Shaggie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:14:46 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > And straight up: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
>
> Bill, it looks to me in that picture like your rear tires are larger
> than your front tires. Is it just some kind of optical illusion or
> are the rear tires actually larger than the front ones? If so were
> you running different gear ratios in the front and rear to compensate?
>
> --
>
> Less drivel, more Dremel.
> Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
> and furthermore always carry a small snake.
> - W.C. Fields