Mike Romain wrote:
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike

Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.

Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.

5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

Mike Romain wrote:
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike

Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.

Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.

5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

Mike Romain wrote:
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike

Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.

Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.

5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.

I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.

Mike

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.

I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.

Mike

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.

I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.

Mike

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.

I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.

Mike

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein