1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
08-22-2006, 04:54 PM
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
Mike Romain wrote:
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike
Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.
Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike
Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.
Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
08-22-2006, 04:54 PM
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
Mike Romain wrote:
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike
Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.
Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike
Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.
Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
08-22-2006, 04:54 PM
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
Mike Romain wrote:
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike
Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.
Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
> What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
>
> Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
>
> Mike
Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
in a bunch.
Here let me piece it together for you:
1) you replied to JRK about the recall
2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
definitely need to check on that."
3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
emissions tests. <yawn>
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
08-22-2006, 05:17 PM
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
08-22-2006, 05:17 PM
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
08-22-2006, 05:17 PM
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
08-22-2006, 05:17 PM
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Jeep Cherokee power loss, missing, no codes...TPS??
I don't know that the person doesn't own an 87 to 91 Cherokee 'also'
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
like they were asking about on the recall so I replied like asked.
I was 'very' specific in my post, you implied otherwise.
Mike
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > What are you blathering on about? I most certainly did qualify my
> > statement with "on the 88-91 XJ" in response to JRK58's comment about
> > 'their' 90's O2 sensor.
> >
> > Maybe katua didn't 'read' my statement, you sure as hell didn't!
> >
> > Mike
>
> Read Katuah's reply to your advice to JRK, then read your immediate
> reply to Katuah later on the same day. BEFORE you get your panties all
> in a bunch.
>
> Here let me piece it together for you:
> 1) you replied to JRK about the recall
> 2) Katuah replied to that post and said "where did you see the recall? I
> definitely need to check on that."
> 3) you replied to Katuah and did not correct them, you mentioned nothing
> at all about the fact that Katuah need not look into that recall...
> 4) So I did, hopefully saving Katuah some fruitless searching. because
> you were too busy sharing your fond memories of emissions tests past.
>
> 5) like we need one more "battle story" of your past "victorious"
> emissions tests. <yawn>
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
quincy451@yahoo.com
Jeep Mailing List
46
07-20-2006 04:43 PM
joe@dokes.com
Jeep Mailing List
16
06-06-2004 09:10 AM
Bryan Bellis
Jeep Mailing List
32
04-19-2004 03:07 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)