To answer your question about the front driveshaft, no, you didn't get
"freak drive shaft". Obviously Napa's book is leaving a lot to be
desired in the realm of accuracy. The front driveshaft on all the TJs
I've seen is always a CV driveshaft. Only the rear driveshaft comes
stock as a U-joint only driveshaft. And man, that front driveshaft
ain't cheap to replace if you damage it on the trail :( but at least
since it properly has the slip in the shaft rather than at the yoke,
an unmodified stocker can still remove it and drive home without
losing the transfer case fluid. ;-)


"Tqm" <tqmfun@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Uxjjc.14072$e4.5381@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> I'm installing some new axle joints on my D30 and had trouble getting the
> correct axle joints (u-joints?). The first set was to small on the caps and
> I had to return them (after wasting a day waiting for a ride) to try and get
> the correct size. I took the old joint to Napa and they matched it up and
> found that what mine needed (according to their book) the u-joint for
> anti-lock brakes. Since I have no anti-lock brakes I thought this was odd.
> Did Jeep use anti-lock axles when the standards ran out on the line?
> Also, their book was incorrect for the front drive shaft. Mine has a
> constant velocity type universal joint at the transfer case (3 u-joints
> total) instead of just two standard u-joints like their book calls out for.
> I looked online and didn't see any other mention of this type of drive shaft
> on a TJ. Did I get a freak drive shaft???
> Anyway, the different sized axle joints might be something to watch out for
> when your stocking up spare parts for the trails.
>
> Tqm
> 97 TJ (Mystery Dana 30)

 

The CV on the TJ is to compensate for the low pinion D30. I always thought
it strange that they used a high pinion 30 on XJs & YJs, but then reverted
on the TJ.

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0404270540.62971ab5@posting.google.c om...
> To answer your question about the front driveshaft, no, you didn't get
> "freak drive shaft". Obviously Napa's book is leaving a lot to be
> desired in the realm of accuracy. The front driveshaft on all the TJs
> I've seen is always a CV driveshaft. Only the rear driveshaft comes
> stock as a U-joint only driveshaft. And man, that front driveshaft
> ain't cheap to replace if you damage it on the trail :( but at least
> since it properly has the slip in the shaft rather than at the yoke,
> an unmodified stocker can still remove it and drive home without
> losing the transfer case fluid. ;-)
>
>
> "Tqm" <tqmfun@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<Uxjjc.14072$e4.5381@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > I'm installing some new axle joints on my D30 and had trouble getting
the
> > correct axle joints (u-joints?). The first set was to small on the caps
and
> > I had to return them (after wasting a day waiting for a ride) to try and
get
> > the correct size. I took the old joint to Napa and they matched it up
and
> > found that what mine needed (according to their book) the u-joint for
> > anti-lock brakes. Since I have no anti-lock brakes I thought this was
odd.
> > Did Jeep use anti-lock axles when the standards ran out on the line?
> > Also, their book was incorrect for the front drive shaft. Mine has a
> > constant velocity type universal joint at the transfer case (3 u-joints
> > total) instead of just two standard u-joints like their book calls out
for.
> > I looked online and didn't see any other mention of this type of drive
shaft
> > on a TJ. Did I get a freak drive shaft???
> > Anyway, the different sized axle joints might be something to watch out
for
> > when your stocking up spare parts for the trails.
> >
> > Tqm
> > 97 TJ (Mystery Dana 30)

 

The CV on the TJ is to compensate for the low pinion D30. I always thought
it strange that they used a high pinion 30 on XJs & YJs, but then reverted
on the TJ.

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0404270540.62971ab5@posting.google.c om...
> To answer your question about the front driveshaft, no, you didn't get
> "freak drive shaft". Obviously Napa's book is leaving a lot to be
> desired in the realm of accuracy. The front driveshaft on all the TJs
> I've seen is always a CV driveshaft. Only the rear driveshaft comes
> stock as a U-joint only driveshaft. And man, that front driveshaft
> ain't cheap to replace if you damage it on the trail :( but at least
> since it properly has the slip in the shaft rather than at the yoke,
> an unmodified stocker can still remove it and drive home without
> losing the transfer case fluid. ;-)
>
>
> "Tqm" <tqmfun@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<Uxjjc.14072$e4.5381@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > I'm installing some new axle joints on my D30 and had trouble getting
the
> > correct axle joints (u-joints?). The first set was to small on the caps
and
> > I had to return them (after wasting a day waiting for a ride) to try and
get
> > the correct size. I took the old joint to Napa and they matched it up
and
> > found that what mine needed (according to their book) the u-joint for
> > anti-lock brakes. Since I have no anti-lock brakes I thought this was
odd.
> > Did Jeep use anti-lock axles when the standards ran out on the line?
> > Also, their book was incorrect for the front drive shaft. Mine has a
> > constant velocity type universal joint at the transfer case (3 u-joints
> > total) instead of just two standard u-joints like their book calls out
for.
> > I looked online and didn't see any other mention of this type of drive
shaft
> > on a TJ. Did I get a freak drive shaft???
> > Anyway, the different sized axle joints might be something to watch out
for
> > when your stocking up spare parts for the trails.
> >
> > Tqm
> > 97 TJ (Mystery Dana 30)

 

The CV on the TJ is to compensate for the low pinion D30. I always thought
it strange that they used a high pinion 30 on XJs & YJs, but then reverted
on the TJ.

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0404270540.62971ab5@posting.google.c om...
> To answer your question about the front driveshaft, no, you didn't get
> "freak drive shaft". Obviously Napa's book is leaving a lot to be
> desired in the realm of accuracy. The front driveshaft on all the TJs
> I've seen is always a CV driveshaft. Only the rear driveshaft comes
> stock as a U-joint only driveshaft. And man, that front driveshaft
> ain't cheap to replace if you damage it on the trail :( but at least
> since it properly has the slip in the shaft rather than at the yoke,
> an unmodified stocker can still remove it and drive home without
> losing the transfer case fluid. ;-)
>
>
> "Tqm" <tqmfun@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<Uxjjc.14072$e4.5381@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > I'm installing some new axle joints on my D30 and had trouble getting
the
> > correct axle joints (u-joints?). The first set was to small on the caps
and
> > I had to return them (after wasting a day waiting for a ride) to try and
get
> > the correct size. I took the old joint to Napa and they matched it up
and
> > found that what mine needed (according to their book) the u-joint for
> > anti-lock brakes. Since I have no anti-lock brakes I thought this was
odd.
> > Did Jeep use anti-lock axles when the standards ran out on the line?
> > Also, their book was incorrect for the front drive shaft. Mine has a
> > constant velocity type universal joint at the transfer case (3 u-joints
> > total) instead of just two standard u-joints like their book calls out
for.
> > I looked online and didn't see any other mention of this type of drive
shaft
> > on a TJ. Did I get a freak drive shaft???
> > Anyway, the different sized axle joints might be something to watch out
for
> > when your stocking up spare parts for the trails.
> >
> > Tqm
> > 97 TJ (Mystery Dana 30)

 

The CV on the TJ is to compensate for the low pinion D30. I always thought
it strange that they used a high pinion 30 on XJs & YJs, but then reverted
on the TJ.

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0404270540.62971ab5@posting.google.c om...
> To answer your question about the front driveshaft, no, you didn't get
> "freak drive shaft". Obviously Napa's book is leaving a lot to be
> desired in the realm of accuracy. The front driveshaft on all the TJs
> I've seen is always a CV driveshaft. Only the rear driveshaft comes
> stock as a U-joint only driveshaft. And man, that front driveshaft
> ain't cheap to replace if you damage it on the trail :( but at least
> since it properly has the slip in the shaft rather than at the yoke,
> an unmodified stocker can still remove it and drive home without
> losing the transfer case fluid. ;-)
>
>
> "Tqm" <tqmfun@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<Uxjjc.14072$e4.5381@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > I'm installing some new axle joints on my D30 and had trouble getting
the
> > correct axle joints (u-joints?). The first set was to small on the caps
and
> > I had to return them (after wasting a day waiting for a ride) to try and
get
> > the correct size. I took the old joint to Napa and they matched it up
and
> > found that what mine needed (according to their book) the u-joint for
> > anti-lock brakes. Since I have no anti-lock brakes I thought this was
odd.
> > Did Jeep use anti-lock axles when the standards ran out on the line?
> > Also, their book was incorrect for the front drive shaft. Mine has a
> > constant velocity type universal joint at the transfer case (3 u-joints
> > total) instead of just two standard u-joints like their book calls out
for.
> > I looked online and didn't see any other mention of this type of drive
shaft
> > on a TJ. Did I get a freak drive shaft???
> > Anyway, the different sized axle joints might be something to watch out
for
> > when your stocking up spare parts for the trails.
> >
> > Tqm
> > 97 TJ (Mystery Dana 30)