1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data
Guest
Posts: n/a
next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test is
required.
> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
> hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
> how that goes by with the shop owner.
> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
> them this stuff.
That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the person
who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a difference.
Snow...
Guest
Posts: n/a
> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test is
required.
> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
> hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
> how that goes by with the shop owner.
> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
> them this stuff.
That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the person
who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a difference.
Snow...
Guest
Posts: n/a
> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test is
required.
> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
> hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
> how that goes by with the shop owner.
> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
> them this stuff.
That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the person
who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a difference.
Snow...
Guest
Posts: n/a
> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test is
required.
> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
> hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
> how that goes by with the shop owner.
> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
> them this stuff.
That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the person
who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a difference.
Snow...
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think I will have to do one more
in 08
as this test will cover my renewal for 2006 then skips 2007 then 2008
another test.
somehow I got away with not having to have the test done when it transfer
owners they are letting me ride till 2006 plate renewal but I want to get it
done while I have the money....
well time for me to drive it to the garage now
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:PX59e.5302$Jg5.446005@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
>
>> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
>
> Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
> last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test
> is required.
>
>
>> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work
>> and hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
>> how that goes by with the shop owner.
>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
>> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
>> them this stuff.
>
> That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the
> person who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a
> difference.
>
> Snow...
>
>
in 08
as this test will cover my renewal for 2006 then skips 2007 then 2008
another test.
somehow I got away with not having to have the test done when it transfer
owners they are letting me ride till 2006 plate renewal but I want to get it
done while I have the money....
well time for me to drive it to the garage now
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:PX59e.5302$Jg5.446005@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
>
>> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
>
> Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
> last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test
> is required.
>
>
>> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work
>> and hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
>> how that goes by with the shop owner.
>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
>> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
>> them this stuff.
>
> That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the
> person who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a
> difference.
>
> Snow...
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think I will have to do one more
in 08
as this test will cover my renewal for 2006 then skips 2007 then 2008
another test.
somehow I got away with not having to have the test done when it transfer
owners they are letting me ride till 2006 plate renewal but I want to get it
done while I have the money....
well time for me to drive it to the garage now
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:PX59e.5302$Jg5.446005@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
>
>> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
>
> Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
> last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test
> is required.
>
>
>> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work
>> and hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
>> how that goes by with the shop owner.
>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
>> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
>> them this stuff.
>
> That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the
> person who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a
> difference.
>
> Snow...
>
>
in 08
as this test will cover my renewal for 2006 then skips 2007 then 2008
another test.
somehow I got away with not having to have the test done when it transfer
owners they are letting me ride till 2006 plate renewal but I want to get it
done while I have the money....
well time for me to drive it to the garage now
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:PX59e.5302$Jg5.446005@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
>
>> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
>
> Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
> last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test
> is required.
>
>
>> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work
>> and hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
>> how that goes by with the shop owner.
>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
>> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
>> them this stuff.
>
> That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the
> person who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a
> difference.
>
> Snow...
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think I will have to do one more
in 08
as this test will cover my renewal for 2006 then skips 2007 then 2008
another test.
somehow I got away with not having to have the test done when it transfer
owners they are letting me ride till 2006 plate renewal but I want to get it
done while I have the money....
well time for me to drive it to the garage now
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:PX59e.5302$Jg5.446005@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
>
>> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
>
> Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
> last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test
> is required.
>
>
>> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work
>> and hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
>> how that goes by with the shop owner.
>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
>> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
>> them this stuff.
>
> That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the
> person who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a
> difference.
>
> Snow...
>
>
in 08
as this test will cover my renewal for 2006 then skips 2007 then 2008
another test.
somehow I got away with not having to have the test done when it transfer
owners they are letting me ride till 2006 plate renewal but I want to get it
done while I have the money....
well time for me to drive it to the garage now
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:PX59e.5302$Jg5.446005@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
>
>> next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?
>
> Yep test covers cars 20 yrs to 3 yrs old. so by right this should be the
> last test your Jeep will need as it will be 21 yrs old next time the test
> is required.
>
>
>> well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work
>> and hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see
>> how that goes by with the shop owner.
>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it
>> is a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell
>> them this stuff.
>
> That's the problem, they have a computer that tells them, too bad the
> person who programmed the computer didn't know there might be a
> difference.
>
> Snow...
>
>


