1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data
Guest
Posts: n/a
I passed my extortion test yesterday
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
Extortion test... love that one Mike!
My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
(Limit/Reading)
ASM252
HC ppm 55 / 11
CO% 0.31 / 0.17
NO ppm 780 / 55
Curb Idle
HC ppm 200 / 7
CO% 1.00 / 0.33
-Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a
I passed my extortion test yesterday
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
Extortion test... love that one Mike!
My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
(Limit/Reading)
ASM252
HC ppm 55 / 11
CO% 0.31 / 0.17
NO ppm 780 / 55
Curb Idle
HC ppm 200 / 7
CO% 1.00 / 0.33
-Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a
I passed my extortion test yesterday
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
Extortion test... love that one Mike!
My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
(Limit/Reading)
ASM252
HC ppm 55 / 11
CO% 0.31 / 0.17
NO ppm 780 / 55
Curb Idle
HC ppm 200 / 7
CO% 1.00 / 0.33
-Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I passed my extortion test yesterday
ya easy to pass when fuel injected.
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I passed my extortion test yesterday
ya easy to pass when fuel injected.
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I passed my extortion test yesterday
ya easy to pass when fuel injected.
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I passed my extortion test yesterday
ya easy to pass when fuel injected.
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
try to pass with a carb....near impossible or impossibile to drive to set
the carb so out of limits then it isn't driveable.
"Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xp6dnfvQ0INGVv3fRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>>
>> And 16 ppm HC
>>
>> And 0.11% CO
>>
>
>
> Extortion test... love that one Mike!
>
> My numbers ('92 XJ 4L)
>
> (Limit/Reading)
> ASM252
> HC ppm 55 / 11
> CO% 0.31 / 0.17
> NO ppm 780 / 55
>
> Curb Idle
> HC ppm 200 / 7
> CO% 1.00 / 0.33
>
> -Brian
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data
I've done the "Nutter" - it is very sweet and easy. The power is seat of the
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.
We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.
We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data
I've done the "Nutter" - it is very sweet and easy. The power is seat of the
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.
We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.
We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data
I've done the "Nutter" - it is very sweet and easy. The power is seat of the
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.
We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.
We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80D28@sympatico.ca...
> Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
> put the directions online:
>
> http://www.off-road.com/jeep/jnutter1.htm
>
> It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
> mph extra per gear.
>
> The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
> have to be too far back to pass.
>
> The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
> 2525 test I was told.
>
> I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
> I
> disabled the computer in.
>
> Specs.
>
> - 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
> - No computer, 'Nuttered'
> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
> there.)
> - 92 octane ESSO gas.
> - Ported on the timing advance
> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
> rebuild kit for the test.
> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway
>
> On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.
>
> And 16 ppm HC
>
> And 0.11% CO
>
> Photo of the papers here:
> http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=4290636987
>
> And a post on alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
> paperwork.
>
> Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
> pass that.
>
> And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
> becomes too old before the next one.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's