134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Iraq Was :R134a Refrigerant
Bill,
The Administration desperately wanted an excuse to invade Iraq, so much so
that on Sept 12, 2001, Bush asked Richard Clarke to double and triple check
to see if Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks, even though everyone else was
convinced it was Al Qaida. He then took dubious third-hand intelligence and
formulated a "clear and present danger to the security of the United States"
scenario, without even trying to verify it. Remember the yellowcake uranium
that Bush brought up in his SOTU address of 2002? It was shown to be
completely false.
The brilliance here is that Bush and his people pull a Clintonesque legal
technicality excuse and say they never "lied," only that the intelligence
was faulty, and blame Goerge Tenent (who was later decorated by Bush) and
the CIA. But the concern should be that the CIA freely admitted that much of
that intelligence was at best questionable and shouldn't be used to make
policy without firsthand verification; instead the Administration called it
"irrefutable evidence" and based the whole invasion on it. Of course now,
they downplay the clear and present danger issue and say they were trying to
liberate Iraq all along.
The high treason that Steve alluded to was that the person who refuted the
yellowcake/Niger story was politically avenged by outing his wife, a veteran
NOC operative at the CIA. The identity of the person or persons in the
Adminsitration haven't been discovered because the Bush Administration has
been stonewalling, and the Republicans in Congress will never allow a
Congressional investigation of this treason, so the special prosecutor
investigating is forced to hold second-rate journalists in contempt by not
revealing their sources, while the guy the broke the whole story, a die-hard
conservative columnist, remains footloose and fancy free.
The media doesn't cover it because they make more money by covering the
Michael Jackson circus/trial and the Runaway Bride story.
Anyway, anyone who thinks that any president has never lied to his country
to further his political agenda is a naive fool.
That said, I think Bush has a great idea in turning the about-to-be-closed
military bases into nuclear power plants. It will help us reduce our
dependence on foreign oil, and then when the price of oil falls, Saudi
Arabia won't be able to finance its --------- activities and the world will
be safer. But I fear that Bush's plan is just talk and he will continue to
do the bidding of his masters in Big Oil.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AB0907.DCF125AC@***.net...
> Who lied to us?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Can't argue with that. See, we agree occasionally...
The Administration desperately wanted an excuse to invade Iraq, so much so
that on Sept 12, 2001, Bush asked Richard Clarke to double and triple check
to see if Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks, even though everyone else was
convinced it was Al Qaida. He then took dubious third-hand intelligence and
formulated a "clear and present danger to the security of the United States"
scenario, without even trying to verify it. Remember the yellowcake uranium
that Bush brought up in his SOTU address of 2002? It was shown to be
completely false.
The brilliance here is that Bush and his people pull a Clintonesque legal
technicality excuse and say they never "lied," only that the intelligence
was faulty, and blame Goerge Tenent (who was later decorated by Bush) and
the CIA. But the concern should be that the CIA freely admitted that much of
that intelligence was at best questionable and shouldn't be used to make
policy without firsthand verification; instead the Administration called it
"irrefutable evidence" and based the whole invasion on it. Of course now,
they downplay the clear and present danger issue and say they were trying to
liberate Iraq all along.
The high treason that Steve alluded to was that the person who refuted the
yellowcake/Niger story was politically avenged by outing his wife, a veteran
NOC operative at the CIA. The identity of the person or persons in the
Adminsitration haven't been discovered because the Bush Administration has
been stonewalling, and the Republicans in Congress will never allow a
Congressional investigation of this treason, so the special prosecutor
investigating is forced to hold second-rate journalists in contempt by not
revealing their sources, while the guy the broke the whole story, a die-hard
conservative columnist, remains footloose and fancy free.
The media doesn't cover it because they make more money by covering the
Michael Jackson circus/trial and the Runaway Bride story.
Anyway, anyone who thinks that any president has never lied to his country
to further his political agenda is a naive fool.
That said, I think Bush has a great idea in turning the about-to-be-closed
military bases into nuclear power plants. It will help us reduce our
dependence on foreign oil, and then when the price of oil falls, Saudi
Arabia won't be able to finance its --------- activities and the world will
be safer. But I fear that Bush's plan is just talk and he will continue to
do the bidding of his masters in Big Oil.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AB0907.DCF125AC@***.net...
> Who lied to us?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Can't argue with that. See, we agree occasionally...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:Hewqe.2523$751.377@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com ...
> How the hell would you know?
because your own links are nothing more than "could be's".
> I'll just bet you abide by the law.. when someone's
> looking, anyway.
personal attacks give you no credibility.
> You don't get it, and I'm not going to
> waste much more breath trying to make you
> get it... after this post, it's ridicule, buddy.
TRANSLATION --> "i have no real response for the links you provided".
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use)
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend
> to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
> Think about that one... *engineers*, Nate, the
> ones that design and build the systems
hey einstein, who do you think WROTE THE MANUALS that im quoting? :-)
those same engineers that you present as being omnipotent wrote the very
manuals that CLEARLY show that refrigerants FALL due to their weight.
> you are only qualified
> to leak-check.
lol....personal insults (particularly ones based in ignorance) give you NO
credibility. :-) fact is, you have no idea what im qualified to do, or
what level of OEM training i have.
> you are like the altar-boy,
> whereas the *engineer* is the Priest
the same engineer that wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> rest assured
> that they understand partial pressures, and probabilities
> of distribution, much better than you do.
.....and yet they wrote the manuals supporting my statements. :-)
> Well, I can assure you that Freon
> *mixes* just like all the others.
and a mixed gas becomes even heavier than it was before.
......like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
> Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
> Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
its both. i am a libertarian politically but im also a parent and put the
welfare of my children ahead of all else. these dirty little bastards are
raised to hate americans, taught to kill americans, etc. if they do not
wish to coexist in peace there is only one alternative as far as im
concerned....natural selection.
> Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
>> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
> We'll never know
what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
> the Space Cowboy rode
> in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
dont mess with texas. :-)
> Everyone knows that they *did*
> exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
> If
> Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> it would have been brilliant
it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
another decade like the last one.
> http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11am9s4b21a8ced@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:moFqe.2562$751.2379@newssvr30.news.prodigy.co m...
>
> > Oh, 'integrity' == 'sheeple'.
>
> which is what you tell yourself to justify having none.
I'll tell you what 'integrity' means to me... it means,
when you're shown evidence that your belief system
is wrong, or needs change, you accomodate that
necessary change into your beliefs. Now what does
this say about *your* belief system about Freon,
and the overwhelming evidence that I presented?
I'll give you a clue... it shows you have no integrity.
> > Which is it, Nate? Liberation, or nukedom?
>
> its both.
(SNIP) No, it's not, and your copout is noted. You're
either over there liberating them, or not. You cry about
'young girls'... codswallop. Your true colors show...
very ugly colors too.
>
>
> > Can u see why I think your brain is a mess?
>
> TRANSLATION --> "your thinking is beyond my ability to grasp" :-)
You said it, I didn't.... but of course, it's obvious
that this is true. Why aren't we breathing 100%
Argon, Nate?
> >> and what price was that? what would have been an "acceptable" price?
>
> > We'll never know
>
> what a cop-out! you said the "price was to high". i asked a very
> reasonable question and you throw some -------- out which clearly shows you
> havent even tried to think it through and are simply spouting what youve
> been taught to say to promote your political agenda. PITIFUL!
Ironic, ain't it? The self-referential paragraph, I
mean...
Saddam could still be over there,
I wouldn't care that much. I really would like to
see bin Ladin torched, and Afghanistan cleaned
up... but no, that won't happen now, or for a
long time. Iraq got priority... for no good reason.
> > the Space Cowboy rode
> > in from Dodge City and shot the place up.
>
> dont mess with texas. :-)
Who the f*ck do you think is raking
you over the coals right now? Texas
born and bred, buddy... *with* a
brain, and a heart too.
> > Everyone knows that they *did*
> > exist... Saddam ditched 'em, right before we invaded.
>
> yup! he handed them over to someone as evil as he was and i have no doubt
> that he would have gotten them back (or made more) after the heat was off.
> look at how many chances he was given over the last decade!
And monkees fly out of your ears every
other Wednesday... you seriously think he'd
have given them to Iran? And you think *any*
of his neighbors would give them back?
Fool.
> > If
> > Bush had stopped there and sent the inspectors back,
> > it would have been brilliant
>
> it would have been stupid because it would have done nothing more than start
> another decade like the last one.
I feel pretty good about that decade you're describing...
one of the best on record, as a matter of fact. When did
it all go to ----? Pretty plain!
> > http://www.proudliberal.thinkingpeac...ell-the-truth/
>
> lol.....youre REALLY going to quote something with "proudliberal" in the url
> as a credible source of information? BUWHAHA!
Messenger/message Nate... either deal with the information,
or put your cranium back in your culo. I don't see many
links from you, btw...
__
Steve
..