134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- You completely forgot about your
logarithms
360
The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > >
> > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > him the understanding in the book.
> > >
> > > You lose!
> > > __
> > > Steve
> > >> > .
>
> > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > 360
> > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
>
> If you look closely, that's the exact same
> equation I just finished describing for you...
> only I used words, and you used Google.
> You may have passed an equation, but
> you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> __
> Steve
> "i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1mpo5lgkm00@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > What seminars
>
> your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest
of
> the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
Why must there be liberal seminars? Why must I have
attended them? Why are you so dense?
> >> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> > you
> >> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you
just
> >> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
> >> believe
> >> you.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
> provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
> defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
Spin some more... dizzy is a good look
for you.
> here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
> coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
You know... we could have told that about you
from the get-go... but we wanted to prove it
to the masses. You are what you despise...
blatant transferrence.
> > You used the manual for your leak detector
>
> yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
> keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
> refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
Within the atmospheric science industry?
Limitiations, Nate! Own them! The engineers
that wrote your leak detector manual believe
in atmospheric science... why don't you?
> > Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
>
> its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
> valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
Tell me again about how the sun degrades chlorine!
Don't forget to add the part about how mixing something
makes it heavier... also add the part about how a compound
and a mixture are the same thing.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1mpo5lgkm00@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > What seminars
>
> your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest
of
> the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
Why must there be liberal seminars? Why must I have
attended them? Why are you so dense?
> >> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> > you
> >> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you
just
> >> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
> >> believe
> >> you.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
> provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
> defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
Spin some more... dizzy is a good look
for you.
> here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
> coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
You know... we could have told that about you
from the get-go... but we wanted to prove it
to the masses. You are what you despise...
blatant transferrence.
> > You used the manual for your leak detector
>
> yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
> keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
> refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
Within the atmospheric science industry?
Limitiations, Nate! Own them! The engineers
that wrote your leak detector manual believe
in atmospheric science... why don't you?
> > Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
>
> its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
> valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
Tell me again about how the sun degrades chlorine!
Don't forget to add the part about how mixing something
makes it heavier... also add the part about how a compound
and a mixture are the same thing.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1mpo5lgkm00@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > What seminars
>
> your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest
of
> the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
Why must there be liberal seminars? Why must I have
attended them? Why are you so dense?
> >> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> > you
> >> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you
just
> >> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
> >> believe
> >> you.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
> provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
> defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
Spin some more... dizzy is a good look
for you.
> here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
> coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
You know... we could have told that about you
from the get-go... but we wanted to prove it
to the masses. You are what you despise...
blatant transferrence.
> > You used the manual for your leak detector
>
> yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
> keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
> refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
Within the atmospheric science industry?
Limitiations, Nate! Own them! The engineers
that wrote your leak detector manual believe
in atmospheric science... why don't you?
> > Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
>
> its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
> valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
Tell me again about how the sun degrades chlorine!
Don't forget to add the part about how mixing something
makes it heavier... also add the part about how a compound
and a mixture are the same thing.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..