134a Refrigerant
#3631
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:YD9Ee.84$sc3.1@trnddc07...
> don't you remember writing:
fine and well, i stand corrected (<-- the mark of integrity which you
liberals know nothing of). in my haste i failed to express myself properly.
so you are suggesting that sunlight does not destroy chlorine?
"Numerous field tests and evaluations have demonstrated that the addition of
a minimum of 30 parts per million of cyanuric acid to swimming pool water
prevents wasteful destruction of the free chlorine residual by sunlight. "
from
http://webpages.charter.net/poolserv...0Chemistry.htm
and i can find you 1000 links showing that sunlight destroys chlorine.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:YD9Ee.84$sc3.1@trnddc07...
> don't you remember writing:
fine and well, i stand corrected (<-- the mark of integrity which you
liberals know nothing of). in my haste i failed to express myself properly.
so you are suggesting that sunlight does not destroy chlorine?
"Numerous field tests and evaluations have demonstrated that the addition of
a minimum of 30 parts per million of cyanuric acid to swimming pool water
prevents wasteful destruction of the free chlorine residual by sunlight. "
from
http://webpages.charter.net/poolserv...0Chemistry.htm
and i can find you 1000 links showing that sunlight destroys chlorine.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#3632
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:YD9Ee.84$sc3.1@trnddc07...
> don't you remember writing:
fine and well, i stand corrected (<-- the mark of integrity which you
liberals know nothing of). in my haste i failed to express myself properly.
so you are suggesting that sunlight does not destroy chlorine?
"Numerous field tests and evaluations have demonstrated that the addition of
a minimum of 30 parts per million of cyanuric acid to swimming pool water
prevents wasteful destruction of the free chlorine residual by sunlight. "
from
http://webpages.charter.net/poolserv...0Chemistry.htm
and i can find you 1000 links showing that sunlight destroys chlorine.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:YD9Ee.84$sc3.1@trnddc07...
> don't you remember writing:
fine and well, i stand corrected (<-- the mark of integrity which you
liberals know nothing of). in my haste i failed to express myself properly.
so you are suggesting that sunlight does not destroy chlorine?
"Numerous field tests and evaluations have demonstrated that the addition of
a minimum of 30 parts per million of cyanuric acid to swimming pool water
prevents wasteful destruction of the free chlorine residual by sunlight. "
from
http://webpages.charter.net/poolserv...0Chemistry.htm
and i can find you 1000 links showing that sunlight destroys chlorine.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#3633
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:YD9Ee.84$sc3.1@trnddc07...
> don't you remember writing:
fine and well, i stand corrected (<-- the mark of integrity which you
liberals know nothing of). in my haste i failed to express myself properly.
so you are suggesting that sunlight does not destroy chlorine?
"Numerous field tests and evaluations have demonstrated that the addition of
a minimum of 30 parts per million of cyanuric acid to swimming pool water
prevents wasteful destruction of the free chlorine residual by sunlight. "
from
http://webpages.charter.net/poolserv...0Chemistry.htm
and i can find you 1000 links showing that sunlight destroys chlorine.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:YD9Ee.84$sc3.1@trnddc07...
> don't you remember writing:
fine and well, i stand corrected (<-- the mark of integrity which you
liberals know nothing of). in my haste i failed to express myself properly.
so you are suggesting that sunlight does not destroy chlorine?
"Numerous field tests and evaluations have demonstrated that the addition of
a minimum of 30 parts per million of cyanuric acid to swimming pool water
prevents wasteful destruction of the free chlorine residual by sunlight. "
from
http://webpages.charter.net/poolserv...0Chemistry.htm
and i can find you 1000 links showing that sunlight destroys chlorine.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#3634
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e22p7k247460@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:7U%De.1940$Ok6.1455@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t...
> > Now he's not smiling... I'm getting somewhere!
>
> that you are! you went from misinformed to ignorant to a lying bastard with
> no credibility at all. :-)
You forgot about:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3635
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e22p7k247460@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:7U%De.1940$Ok6.1455@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t...
> > Now he's not smiling... I'm getting somewhere!
>
> that you are! you went from misinformed to ignorant to a lying bastard with
> no credibility at all. :-)
You forgot about:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3636
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e22p7k247460@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:7U%De.1940$Ok6.1455@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t...
> > Now he's not smiling... I'm getting somewhere!
>
> that you are! you went from misinformed to ignorant to a lying bastard with
> no credibility at all. :-)
You forgot about:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3637
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e22p7k247460@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:7U%De.1940$Ok6.1455@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t...
> > Now he's not smiling... I'm getting somewhere!
>
> that you are! you went from misinformed to ignorant to a lying bastard with
> no credibility at all. :-)
You forgot about:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3638
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E08FB7.A741FAAF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > At least you're not a liar, Bill... 'fool'
> > is not nearly as bad.
> I never known Nathan to intentionally lie, but you do knowingly,
> here, and blatantly I bet in college.
Then you'll be more than happy to point out
the lie, right?
__
Steve
..
#3639
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E08FB7.A741FAAF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > At least you're not a liar, Bill... 'fool'
> > is not nearly as bad.
> I never known Nathan to intentionally lie, but you do knowingly,
> here, and blatantly I bet in college.
Then you'll be more than happy to point out
the lie, right?
__
Steve
..
#3640
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E08FB7.A741FAAF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > At least you're not a liar, Bill... 'fool'
> > is not nearly as bad.
> I never known Nathan to intentionally lie, but you do knowingly,
> here, and blatantly I bet in college.
Then you'll be more than happy to point out
the lie, right?
__
Steve
..