"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11buufmrf2lt173@corp.supernews.com...
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42BF5F4F.8543E5C8@***.net...
> > I think Stevie trying to tell us pigs can fly.
>
> he's taught in his seminars that if he tells a lie often and loud enough,
> that sooner or later everyone will believe him. one thing they didnt
> prepare him for however, was truth.

Indeed... the entire planet believes me. Kinda amazing
that *I* could get the entire developed world to quit
making and using CFCs... you'd almost imagine that
I was telling the truth! But no... that can't be, because
then Nate and Bill would be full of ----, and we *know*
that's not the case, right?
__
Steve
..

 

"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message news:1119881986.6e873331ae4bd61a8088d7d06aaacab7@t eranews...
> Not intentionally.

Does it have to be intentional?

> I can tell you though that this technique works, whether
> you are telling a lie or the truth. Just keep saying it, and people will
> believe.

Witness the futile hunt for WMD!

> I believe that it is understood best when read with a quote by
> Lincoln. There are people who will just not listen to the truth, no matter
> how loud and often it is shouted at them. "Some of the people, all of the
> time." Nate's new sock puppet may be one of these.

Earle... obviously you need to learn more
about 'sock puppets'... read your wiki.

How do you feel about the ozone layer and CFC's,
BTW? Have you done the gasoline experiment?
__
Steve
..

 

"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message news:1119881986.6e873331ae4bd61a8088d7d06aaacab7@t eranews...
> Not intentionally.

Does it have to be intentional?

> I can tell you though that this technique works, whether
> you are telling a lie or the truth. Just keep saying it, and people will
> believe.

Witness the futile hunt for WMD!

> I believe that it is understood best when read with a quote by
> Lincoln. There are people who will just not listen to the truth, no matter
> how loud and often it is shouted at them. "Some of the people, all of the
> time." Nate's new sock puppet may be one of these.

Earle... obviously you need to learn more
about 'sock puppets'... read your wiki.

How do you feel about the ozone layer and CFC's,
BTW? Have you done the gasoline experiment?
__
Steve
..

 

"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message news:1119881986.6e873331ae4bd61a8088d7d06aaacab7@t eranews...
> Not intentionally.

Does it have to be intentional?

> I can tell you though that this technique works, whether
> you are telling a lie or the truth. Just keep saying it, and people will
> believe.

Witness the futile hunt for WMD!

> I believe that it is understood best when read with a quote by
> Lincoln. There are people who will just not listen to the truth, no matter
> how loud and often it is shouted at them. "Some of the people, all of the
> time." Nate's new sock puppet may be one of these.

Earle... obviously you need to learn more
about 'sock puppets'... read your wiki.

How do you feel about the ozone layer and CFC's,
BTW? Have you done the gasoline experiment?
__
Steve
..

 

"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message news:1119881986.6e873331ae4bd61a8088d7d06aaacab7@t eranews...
> Not intentionally.

Does it have to be intentional?

> I can tell you though that this technique works, whether
> you are telling a lie or the truth. Just keep saying it, and people will
> believe.

Witness the futile hunt for WMD!

> I believe that it is understood best when read with a quote by
> Lincoln. There are people who will just not listen to the truth, no matter
> how loud and often it is shouted at them. "Some of the people, all of the
> time." Nate's new sock puppet may be one of these.

Earle... obviously you need to learn more
about 'sock puppets'... read your wiki.

How do you feel about the ozone layer and CFC's,
BTW? Have you done the gasoline experiment?
__
Steve
..

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7r2we.442$U61.394@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> That's really all you could find? Extra lame!

TRANSLATION --> "i cannot refute your solid evidence"


> Exactly.. your cites are irrelevant to any discussion
> of the atmosphere.

my evidence shows that refrigerants cannot make it to the atmosphere to
begin with.


> Do the gas fume experiment!

not relevant. the explosion causes force that refrigerant does not have.


> Stonewalling... your last resort. I win! *** kicked
> by a Liberal

TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing"

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7r2we.442$U61.394@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> That's really all you could find? Extra lame!

TRANSLATION --> "i cannot refute your solid evidence"


> Exactly.. your cites are irrelevant to any discussion
> of the atmosphere.

my evidence shows that refrigerants cannot make it to the atmosphere to
begin with.


> Do the gas fume experiment!

not relevant. the explosion causes force that refrigerant does not have.


> Stonewalling... your last resort. I win! *** kicked
> by a Liberal

TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing"

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7r2we.442$U61.394@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> That's really all you could find? Extra lame!

TRANSLATION --> "i cannot refute your solid evidence"


> Exactly.. your cites are irrelevant to any discussion
> of the atmosphere.

my evidence shows that refrigerants cannot make it to the atmosphere to
begin with.


> Do the gas fume experiment!

not relevant. the explosion causes force that refrigerant does not have.


> Stonewalling... your last resort. I win! *** kicked
> by a Liberal

TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing"

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7r2we.442$U61.394@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> That's really all you could find? Extra lame!

TRANSLATION --> "i cannot refute your solid evidence"


> Exactly.. your cites are irrelevant to any discussion
> of the atmosphere.

my evidence shows that refrigerants cannot make it to the atmosphere to
begin with.


> Do the gas fume experiment!

not relevant. the explosion causes force that refrigerant does not have.


> Stonewalling... your last resort. I win! *** kicked
> by a Liberal

TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing"

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

Earle, once showed us his W-2 for over three quarters of a million
dollars, I don't think he worries about your opinion of him.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message news:1119881986.6e873331ae4bd61a8088d7d06aaacab7@t eranews...
> > Not intentionally.
>
> Does it have to be intentional?
>
> Witness the futile hunt for WMD!
>
> Earle... obviously you need to learn more
> about 'sock puppets'... read your wiki.
>
> How do you feel about the ozone layer and CFC's,
> BTW? Have you done the gasoline experiment?
> __
> Steve
> .