134a Refrigerant
#1531
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> I already have... the burden is on you.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
thank you. i already knew that.
> The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
taught in your seminars.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> I already have... the burden is on you.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
thank you. i already knew that.
> The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
taught in your seminars.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1532
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> I already have... the burden is on you.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
thank you. i already knew that.
> The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
taught in your seminars.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> I already have... the burden is on you.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
thank you. i already knew that.
> The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
taught in your seminars.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1533
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> I already have... the burden is on you.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
thank you. i already knew that.
> The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
taught in your seminars.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> I already have... the burden is on you.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
thank you. i already knew that.
> The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
taught in your seminars.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1534
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11br0t22p92q034@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > I already have... the burden is on you.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
>
> thank you. i already knew that.
Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
science... give up.
> > The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> > there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
>
> you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
> above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
> what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
> engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
Sorry... no mention of ozone. Find a post that
supports your assertion that actually mentions
the ozone layer, which was your original --------
assertion anyway... or FOAD.
> the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
> have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
> taught in your seminars.
And I published a link to an HVAC industry
periodical debunking your assertion.. I've got
all bases covered. You're at the end of your
rope... might as well jump off the stump! : )
__
Steve
..
#1535
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11br0t22p92q034@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > I already have... the burden is on you.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
>
> thank you. i already knew that.
Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
science... give up.
> > The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> > there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
>
> you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
> above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
> what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
> engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
Sorry... no mention of ozone. Find a post that
supports your assertion that actually mentions
the ozone layer, which was your original --------
assertion anyway... or FOAD.
> the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
> have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
> taught in your seminars.
And I published a link to an HVAC industry
periodical debunking your assertion.. I've got
all bases covered. You're at the end of your
rope... might as well jump off the stump! : )
__
Steve
..
#1536
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11br0t22p92q034@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > I already have... the burden is on you.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
>
> thank you. i already knew that.
Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
science... give up.
> > The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> > there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
>
> you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
> above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
> what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
> engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
Sorry... no mention of ozone. Find a post that
supports your assertion that actually mentions
the ozone layer, which was your original --------
assertion anyway... or FOAD.
> the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
> have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
> taught in your seminars.
And I published a link to an HVAC industry
periodical debunking your assertion.. I've got
all bases covered. You're at the end of your
rope... might as well jump off the stump! : )
__
Steve
..
#1537
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11br0t22p92q034@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:si8ve.1834$5w3.446@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > I already have... the burden is on you.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide you with conclusive science"
>
> thank you. i already knew that.
Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
science... give up.
> > The absence of science in your posts is telling...
> > there are no scientists supporting your assertions.
>
> you speak of "engineers" and tell me all about how engineers are gods and
> above me, yet when i provide you with two solid links that clearly state
> what ive been telling you, written by those same engineers, you drop
> engineers and change it to scientists. :-)
Sorry... no mention of ozone. Find a post that
supports your assertion that actually mentions
the ozone layer, which was your original --------
assertion anyway... or FOAD.
> the engineering is indeed science, and those from within the hvac industry
> have spoken. you just dont want to listen because thats not what you were
> taught in your seminars.
And I published a link to an HVAC industry
periodical debunking your assertion.. I've got
all bases covered. You're at the end of your
rope... might as well jump off the stump! : )
__
Steve
..
#1538
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:MRHve.181$U61.56@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.. .
> Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
> science
ive given you the science. clear instructions written by engineers from
within the hvac industry. :-)
> Sorry... no mention of ozone.
exactly. ozone isnt an issue since my links clearly prove that refrigerant
falls. theres no mention in my articles of jupiter either. why? because
its irrelevant.
> And I published a link to an HVAC industry
> periodical debunking your assertion
lol....._nothing_ conclusive in any of your links. my links clearly state
that refrigerant falls due to its weight. you just cant acknowledge
anything beyond your own liberal agenda.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:MRHve.181$U61.56@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.. .
> Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
> science
ive given you the science. clear instructions written by engineers from
within the hvac industry. :-)
> Sorry... no mention of ozone.
exactly. ozone isnt an issue since my links clearly prove that refrigerant
falls. theres no mention in my articles of jupiter either. why? because
its irrelevant.
> And I published a link to an HVAC industry
> periodical debunking your assertion
lol....._nothing_ conclusive in any of your links. my links clearly state
that refrigerant falls due to its weight. you just cant acknowledge
anything beyond your own liberal agenda.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1539
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:MRHve.181$U61.56@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.. .
> Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
> science
ive given you the science. clear instructions written by engineers from
within the hvac industry. :-)
> Sorry... no mention of ozone.
exactly. ozone isnt an issue since my links clearly prove that refrigerant
falls. theres no mention in my articles of jupiter either. why? because
its irrelevant.
> And I published a link to an HVAC industry
> periodical debunking your assertion
lol....._nothing_ conclusive in any of your links. my links clearly state
that refrigerant falls due to its weight. you just cant acknowledge
anything beyond your own liberal agenda.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:MRHve.181$U61.56@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.. .
> Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
> science
ive given you the science. clear instructions written by engineers from
within the hvac industry. :-)
> Sorry... no mention of ozone.
exactly. ozone isnt an issue since my links clearly prove that refrigerant
falls. theres no mention in my articles of jupiter either. why? because
its irrelevant.
> And I published a link to an HVAC industry
> periodical debunking your assertion
lol....._nothing_ conclusive in any of your links. my links clearly state
that refrigerant falls due to its weight. you just cant acknowledge
anything beyond your own liberal agenda.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1540
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:MRHve.181$U61.56@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.. .
> Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
> science
ive given you the science. clear instructions written by engineers from
within the hvac industry. :-)
> Sorry... no mention of ozone.
exactly. ozone isnt an issue since my links clearly prove that refrigerant
falls. theres no mention in my articles of jupiter either. why? because
its irrelevant.
> And I published a link to an HVAC industry
> periodical debunking your assertion
lol....._nothing_ conclusive in any of your links. my links clearly state
that refrigerant falls due to its weight. you just cant acknowledge
anything beyond your own liberal agenda.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:MRHve.181$U61.56@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.. .
> Already done... you're stonewalling. You have no
> science
ive given you the science. clear instructions written by engineers from
within the hvac industry. :-)
> Sorry... no mention of ozone.
exactly. ozone isnt an issue since my links clearly prove that refrigerant
falls. theres no mention in my articles of jupiter either. why? because
its irrelevant.
> And I published a link to an HVAC industry
> periodical debunking your assertion
lol....._nothing_ conclusive in any of your links. my links clearly state
that refrigerant falls due to its weight. you just cant acknowledge
anything beyond your own liberal agenda.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com