"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B86A5F.3D47786D@***.net...
> have you listened the Howard Dean
> lately, his the best promotion the Republicans have ever had.

lol for sure. i really hope he's the next democratic presidential nominee.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11bgn56daq7i84e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > In that case, I win, by default.
>
> you just tell yourself whatever you need to in order to convince yourself
> that youve actually accomplished something to promote your agenda (beyond
> exposing yourself for the true dumb *** that you are). :-)
>
> youve tried to impress us with your education, made multiple direct and
> indirect references to my *** and my -----, spun more straw men then ive
> seen in some time, thrown so many herrings that you simply must be
> tired....but in the end its quite evident that your just one big pile of
> ----....human garbage who is here only to promote his political agenda.
>
> .....and you failed miserably. :-)

.... to promote my *science* agenda... you never did
debunk NOAA, Nate... don't think we've forgotten.
What about the rest of the planet? You asserted that
you would change your mind if given good evidence...
I gave you the best... you stonewalled. That makes
you a *lying piece of ----*. Chomp that.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11bgn56daq7i84e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > In that case, I win, by default.
>
> you just tell yourself whatever you need to in order to convince yourself
> that youve actually accomplished something to promote your agenda (beyond
> exposing yourself for the true dumb *** that you are). :-)
>
> youve tried to impress us with your education, made multiple direct and
> indirect references to my *** and my -----, spun more straw men then ive
> seen in some time, thrown so many herrings that you simply must be
> tired....but in the end its quite evident that your just one big pile of
> ----....human garbage who is here only to promote his political agenda.
>
> .....and you failed miserably. :-)

.... to promote my *science* agenda... you never did
debunk NOAA, Nate... don't think we've forgotten.
What about the rest of the planet? You asserted that
you would change your mind if given good evidence...
I gave you the best... you stonewalled. That makes
you a *lying piece of ----*. Chomp that.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11bgn56daq7i84e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > In that case, I win, by default.
>
> you just tell yourself whatever you need to in order to convince yourself
> that youve actually accomplished something to promote your agenda (beyond
> exposing yourself for the true dumb *** that you are). :-)
>
> youve tried to impress us with your education, made multiple direct and
> indirect references to my *** and my -----, spun more straw men then ive
> seen in some time, thrown so many herrings that you simply must be
> tired....but in the end its quite evident that your just one big pile of
> ----....human garbage who is here only to promote his political agenda.
>
> .....and you failed miserably. :-)

.... to promote my *science* agenda... you never did
debunk NOAA, Nate... don't think we've forgotten.
What about the rest of the planet? You asserted that
you would change your mind if given good evidence...
I gave you the best... you stonewalled. That makes
you a *lying piece of ----*. Chomp that.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11bgn56daq7i84e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > In that case, I win, by default.
>
> you just tell yourself whatever you need to in order to convince yourself
> that youve actually accomplished something to promote your agenda (beyond
> exposing yourself for the true dumb *** that you are). :-)
>
> youve tried to impress us with your education, made multiple direct and
> indirect references to my *** and my -----, spun more straw men then ive
> seen in some time, thrown so many herrings that you simply must be
> tired....but in the end its quite evident that your just one big pile of
> ----....human garbage who is here only to promote his political agenda.
>
> .....and you failed miserably. :-)

.... to promote my *science* agenda... you never did
debunk NOAA, Nate... don't think we've forgotten.
What about the rest of the planet? You asserted that
you would change your mind if given good evidence...
I gave you the best... you stonewalled. That makes
you a *lying piece of ----*. Chomp that.
__
Steve
..

 

"Peter Pontbriand" <TRIMsprocketATstormDOTcaTRIM> wrote in message news:1dOdnSTrZoV_5CXfRVn-tQ@storm.ca...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11bffpqn0a58jc0@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:U6Mte.876$W74.370@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > > In that case, I win, by default.
> >
> > just goes to show how full of ---- you are. seminar liberals are taught
> to
> > never _ever_ let an opposing view get the last word (yes, i know how it
> > works) no matter what. you feel that if you tell a lie often enough that
> > everyone around you will believe it. well mr. seminar liberal, nobody is
> > falling for your line of crap no matter how many times you puke it up.
> win?
> > lol.... by your own admission youre a loser and im not referencing a silly
> > internet argument, im talking about in life. :-)
>
> In that case, I win, by default.
> __
> Steve
> .
> I suspect the only thing you are winning is the ire of those of us who've
> suffered through this pissing match for far too long. Back when you were
> making cogent arguments I was actually enjoying this to some degree, but for
> a while now the only thing you're proving is that you are too stubborn to
> bow out gracefully when your adversaries are reduced to incoherent
> foul-mouthed name calling. Not very sporting.

Sporting? > ) Who said this had to be sporting?
If I'm having sport, then it's sporting! Try reasoning
with Nate... I'm sure you'll find him much more
reasonable than I am. BTW, I have a hard time
believing that one post a day, apiece, is tearing you
guys up.
__
Steve
..

 

"Peter Pontbriand" <TRIMsprocketATstormDOTcaTRIM> wrote in message news:1dOdnSTrZoV_5CXfRVn-tQ@storm.ca...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11bffpqn0a58jc0@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:U6Mte.876$W74.370@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > > In that case, I win, by default.
> >
> > just goes to show how full of ---- you are. seminar liberals are taught
> to
> > never _ever_ let an opposing view get the last word (yes, i know how it
> > works) no matter what. you feel that if you tell a lie often enough that
> > everyone around you will believe it. well mr. seminar liberal, nobody is
> > falling for your line of crap no matter how many times you puke it up.
> win?
> > lol.... by your own admission youre a loser and im not referencing a silly
> > internet argument, im talking about in life. :-)
>
> In that case, I win, by default.
> __
> Steve
> .
> I suspect the only thing you are winning is the ire of those of us who've
> suffered through this pissing match for far too long. Back when you were
> making cogent arguments I was actually enjoying this to some degree, but for
> a while now the only thing you're proving is that you are too stubborn to
> bow out gracefully when your adversaries are reduced to incoherent
> foul-mouthed name calling. Not very sporting.

Sporting? > ) Who said this had to be sporting?
If I'm having sport, then it's sporting! Try reasoning
with Nate... I'm sure you'll find him much more
reasonable than I am. BTW, I have a hard time
believing that one post a day, apiece, is tearing you
guys up.
__
Steve
..

 

"Peter Pontbriand" <TRIMsprocketATstormDOTcaTRIM> wrote in message news:1dOdnSTrZoV_5CXfRVn-tQ@storm.ca...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11bffpqn0a58jc0@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:U6Mte.876$W74.370@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > > In that case, I win, by default.
> >
> > just goes to show how full of ---- you are. seminar liberals are taught
> to
> > never _ever_ let an opposing view get the last word (yes, i know how it
> > works) no matter what. you feel that if you tell a lie often enough that
> > everyone around you will believe it. well mr. seminar liberal, nobody is
> > falling for your line of crap no matter how many times you puke it up.
> win?
> > lol.... by your own admission youre a loser and im not referencing a silly
> > internet argument, im talking about in life. :-)
>
> In that case, I win, by default.
> __
> Steve
> .
> I suspect the only thing you are winning is the ire of those of us who've
> suffered through this pissing match for far too long. Back when you were
> making cogent arguments I was actually enjoying this to some degree, but for
> a while now the only thing you're proving is that you are too stubborn to
> bow out gracefully when your adversaries are reduced to incoherent
> foul-mouthed name calling. Not very sporting.

Sporting? > ) Who said this had to be sporting?
If I'm having sport, then it's sporting! Try reasoning
with Nate... I'm sure you'll find him much more
reasonable than I am. BTW, I have a hard time
believing that one post a day, apiece, is tearing you
guys up.
__
Steve
..

 

"Peter Pontbriand" <TRIMsprocketATstormDOTcaTRIM> wrote in message news:1dOdnSTrZoV_5CXfRVn-tQ@storm.ca...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:TgWte.936$W74.454@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11bffpqn0a58jc0@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:U6Mte.876$W74.370@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > > In that case, I win, by default.
> >
> > just goes to show how full of ---- you are. seminar liberals are taught
> to
> > never _ever_ let an opposing view get the last word (yes, i know how it
> > works) no matter what. you feel that if you tell a lie often enough that
> > everyone around you will believe it. well mr. seminar liberal, nobody is
> > falling for your line of crap no matter how many times you puke it up.
> win?
> > lol.... by your own admission youre a loser and im not referencing a silly
> > internet argument, im talking about in life. :-)
>
> In that case, I win, by default.
> __
> Steve
> .
> I suspect the only thing you are winning is the ire of those of us who've
> suffered through this pissing match for far too long. Back when you were
> making cogent arguments I was actually enjoying this to some degree, but for
> a while now the only thing you're proving is that you are too stubborn to
> bow out gracefully when your adversaries are reduced to incoherent
> foul-mouthed name calling. Not very sporting.

Sporting? > ) Who said this had to be sporting?
If I'm having sport, then it's sporting! Try reasoning
with Nate... I'm sure you'll find him much more
reasonable than I am. BTW, I have a hard time
believing that one post a day, apiece, is tearing you
guys up.
__
Steve
..

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:AI5ue.584$5w3.559@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> ... to promote my *science* agenda..

youre "science" agenda was nothing more than "could be's" from self serving
governmental agencies.


> You asserted that
> you would change your mind if given good evidence...

so give me something _conclusive_ that doesnt come from a self serving
governmental agency.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com