134a Refrigerant
06-12-2005, 10:52 PM
#1031
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 10:52 PM
#1032
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 10:52 PM
#1033
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 10:57 PM
#1034
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I'll bet Steve won't have a clue as to why all gas water heaters
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 10:57 PM
#1035
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I'll bet Steve won't have a clue as to why all gas water heaters
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 10:57 PM
#1036
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I'll bet Steve won't have a clue as to why all gas water heaters
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 10:57 PM
#1037
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I'll bet Steve won't have a clue as to why all gas water heaters
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
are installed two feet off the floor, either.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-)
>
> heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)
>
> the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by
> the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant
> falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine,
> or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement
> is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-)
>
> from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
> electronic leak detectors:
> "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
> will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
> on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
> detecting a leak and will save you time."
>
> from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
> leak detector that i personally use):
> "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
> fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
> areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
> of finding such."
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 11:11 PM
#1038
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Oh please, Brer Fox, whatever you do, don't throw me in that briar
patch! ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
> presence.
>
> btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
> and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
> will be. :-)
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
patch! ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
> presence.
>
> btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
> and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
> will be. :-)
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 11:11 PM
#1039
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Oh please, Brer Fox, whatever you do, don't throw me in that briar
patch! ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
> presence.
>
> btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
> and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
> will be. :-)
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
patch! ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
> presence.
>
> btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
> and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
> will be. :-)
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-12-2005, 11:11 PM
#1040
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Oh please, Brer Fox, whatever you do, don't throw me in that briar
patch! ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
> presence.
>
> btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
> and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
> will be. :-)
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
patch! ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
> presence.
>
> btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
> and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
> will be. :-)
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
