"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:nO4re.128$kX4.123@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You still want to play 'Scientist and Dumbass'... OK.. :)

dont be so hard on yourself stephen. eventually youll get used to defeat.
:-)


> You don't know what mental work is... remember
> dropping out?

im not surprised that you would equate intelligence with education. its the
only way youre able to suppliment your own short-comings.


> > my personal email from this
> > little flamefest is going %100 my way.
>
> BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of
> time
> before you resorted that that one. :-)

> Well?

.....tell me again about how all your "personal emails" say youre right. i
laughed so hard the first time (literally) and i could use another good one.
:-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .

> So, your answer is, hold the probe
> directly under the leak

as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."

from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."

:-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .

> So, your answer is, hold the probe
> directly under the leak

as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."

from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."

:-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .

> So, your answer is, hold the probe
> directly under the leak

as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."

from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."

:-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .

> So, your answer is, hold the probe
> directly under the leak

as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."

from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."

:-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

Speaking of, how do you like those? I'll be needing new tires shortly
for my '00 JGC, and definitely before winter hits again.

Brandonb


Billy Ray wrote:
> Would it make this conversation even more off topic if I wanted to know what
> effect the slave traffic in africa is having on the new Kumho Venture ATs
> that are on my JGC?

 

Speaking of, how do you like those? I'll be needing new tires shortly
for my '00 JGC, and definitely before winter hits again.

Brandonb


Billy Ray wrote:
> Would it make this conversation even more off topic if I wanted to know what
> effect the slave traffic in africa is having on the new Kumho Venture ATs
> that are on my JGC?

 

Speaking of, how do you like those? I'll be needing new tires shortly
for my '00 JGC, and definitely before winter hits again.

Brandonb


Billy Ray wrote:
> Would it make this conversation even more off topic if I wanted to know what
> effect the slave traffic in africa is having on the new Kumho Venture ATs
> that are on my JGC?

 

Speaking of, how do you like those? I'll be needing new tires shortly
for my '00 JGC, and definitely before winter hits again.

Brandonb


Billy Ray wrote:
> Would it make this conversation even more off topic if I wanted to know what
> effect the slave traffic in africa is having on the new Kumho Venture ATs
> that are on my JGC?

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn16pgc9i1da@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nO4re.128$kX4.123@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You still want to play 'Scientist and Dumbass'... OK.. :)
>
> dont be so hard on yourself stephen. eventually youll get used to defeat.

Yes, you still want to play dumbass. Ok, I'll
kick you some more...

> > You don't know what mental work is... remember
> > dropping out?
>
> im not surprised that you would equate intelligence with education. its the
> only way youre able to suppliment your own short-comings.

If you notice, I didn't mention intelligence... I mentioned
mental work. The kind that gets you through high school.
I called you stupid *before*.

Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
you left the apostrophe off of I'm, you're, and It's, misspelled
'suppliment' and 'shortcomings'. Plus, you think we invaded
Iraq in order to liberate their women, who were unable to
attend school before we got there... and you believe that
Freon is heavier than air, but Argon is not. You think there
is less than one molecule of Freon on the planet Earth...
you don't think Bush told any lies. You refuse to listen
to any link that disagrees with your feeble understanding
of science... You're not really a good poster child for the
'non-college intelligent' crowd.


> > > my personal email from this
> > > little flamefest is going %100 my way.
> >
> > BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of
> > time
> > before you resorted that that one.
>
> > Well?
>
> ....tell me again about how all your "personal emails" say youre right. i
> laughed so hard the first time (literally) and i could use another good one.

Jeez... can't even create a sensible sentence. What's the 'literally'
refer to above? There's no 'figuratively' implied... don't try to
use brains you don't have.

Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here, as well.
I'm getting fond of saying this, so I'll say it again...
I'm the scientist, and you're the dumbass, and the archives
will keep that information forever.

: )
__
Steve
..