"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn16pgc9i1da@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nO4re.128$kX4.123@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You still want to play 'Scientist and Dumbass'... OK.. :)
>
> dont be so hard on yourself stephen. eventually youll get used to defeat.

Yes, you still want to play dumbass. Ok, I'll
kick you some more...

> > You don't know what mental work is... remember
> > dropping out?
>
> im not surprised that you would equate intelligence with education. its the
> only way youre able to suppliment your own short-comings.

If you notice, I didn't mention intelligence... I mentioned
mental work. The kind that gets you through high school.
I called you stupid *before*.

Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
you left the apostrophe off of I'm, you're, and It's, misspelled
'suppliment' and 'shortcomings'. Plus, you think we invaded
Iraq in order to liberate their women, who were unable to
attend school before we got there... and you believe that
Freon is heavier than air, but Argon is not. You think there
is less than one molecule of Freon on the planet Earth...
you don't think Bush told any lies. You refuse to listen
to any link that disagrees with your feeble understanding
of science... You're not really a good poster child for the
'non-college intelligent' crowd.


> > > my personal email from this
> > > little flamefest is going %100 my way.
> >
> > BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of
> > time
> > before you resorted that that one.
>
> > Well?
>
> ....tell me again about how all your "personal emails" say youre right. i
> laughed so hard the first time (literally) and i could use another good one.

Jeez... can't even create a sensible sentence. What's the 'literally'
refer to above? There's no 'figuratively' implied... don't try to
use brains you don't have.

Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here, as well.
I'm getting fond of saying this, so I'll say it again...
I'm the scientist, and you're the dumbass, and the archives
will keep that information forever.

: )
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn16pgc9i1da@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nO4re.128$kX4.123@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You still want to play 'Scientist and Dumbass'... OK.. :)
>
> dont be so hard on yourself stephen. eventually youll get used to defeat.

Yes, you still want to play dumbass. Ok, I'll
kick you some more...

> > You don't know what mental work is... remember
> > dropping out?
>
> im not surprised that you would equate intelligence with education. its the
> only way youre able to suppliment your own short-comings.

If you notice, I didn't mention intelligence... I mentioned
mental work. The kind that gets you through high school.
I called you stupid *before*.

Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
you left the apostrophe off of I'm, you're, and It's, misspelled
'suppliment' and 'shortcomings'. Plus, you think we invaded
Iraq in order to liberate their women, who were unable to
attend school before we got there... and you believe that
Freon is heavier than air, but Argon is not. You think there
is less than one molecule of Freon on the planet Earth...
you don't think Bush told any lies. You refuse to listen
to any link that disagrees with your feeble understanding
of science... You're not really a good poster child for the
'non-college intelligent' crowd.


> > > my personal email from this
> > > little flamefest is going %100 my way.
> >
> > BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of
> > time
> > before you resorted that that one.
>
> > Well?
>
> ....tell me again about how all your "personal emails" say youre right. i
> laughed so hard the first time (literally) and i could use another good one.

Jeez... can't even create a sensible sentence. What's the 'literally'
refer to above? There's no 'figuratively' implied... don't try to
use brains you don't have.

Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here, as well.
I'm getting fond of saying this, so I'll say it again...
I'm the scientist, and you're the dumbass, and the archives
will keep that information forever.

: )
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn16pgc9i1da@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nO4re.128$kX4.123@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You still want to play 'Scientist and Dumbass'... OK.. :)
>
> dont be so hard on yourself stephen. eventually youll get used to defeat.

Yes, you still want to play dumbass. Ok, I'll
kick you some more...

> > You don't know what mental work is... remember
> > dropping out?
>
> im not surprised that you would equate intelligence with education. its the
> only way youre able to suppliment your own short-comings.

If you notice, I didn't mention intelligence... I mentioned
mental work. The kind that gets you through high school.
I called you stupid *before*.

Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
you left the apostrophe off of I'm, you're, and It's, misspelled
'suppliment' and 'shortcomings'. Plus, you think we invaded
Iraq in order to liberate their women, who were unable to
attend school before we got there... and you believe that
Freon is heavier than air, but Argon is not. You think there
is less than one molecule of Freon on the planet Earth...
you don't think Bush told any lies. You refuse to listen
to any link that disagrees with your feeble understanding
of science... You're not really a good poster child for the
'non-college intelligent' crowd.


> > > my personal email from this
> > > little flamefest is going %100 my way.
> >
> > BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of
> > time
> > before you resorted that that one.
>
> > Well?
>
> ....tell me again about how all your "personal emails" say youre right. i
> laughed so hard the first time (literally) and i could use another good one.

Jeez... can't even create a sensible sentence. What's the 'literally'
refer to above? There's no 'figuratively' implied... don't try to
use brains you don't have.

Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here, as well.
I'm getting fond of saying this, so I'll say it again...
I'm the scientist, and you're the dumbass, and the archives
will keep that information forever.

: )
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn5ae15d174e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .
>
>>So, your answer is, hold the probe
>>directly under the leak, even in the
>>wind? Why not downwind, human?
>
> as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
> because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
> determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

And since your booklet doesn't tell you this,
you don't know enough to hold the probe
both under and *downwind* of the leak?
__
Steve

: )

..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn5ae15d174e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .
>
>>So, your answer is, hold the probe
>>directly under the leak, even in the
>>wind? Why not downwind, human?
>
> as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
> because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
> determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

And since your booklet doesn't tell you this,
you don't know enough to hold the probe
both under and *downwind* of the leak?
__
Steve

: )

..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn5ae15d174e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .
>
>>So, your answer is, hold the probe
>>directly under the leak, even in the
>>wind? Why not downwind, human?
>
> as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
> because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
> determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

And since your booklet doesn't tell you this,
you don't know enough to hold the probe
both under and *downwind* of the leak?
__
Steve

: )

..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11apn5ae15d174e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:iW4re.131$kX4.49@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.. .
>
>>So, your answer is, hold the probe
>>directly under the leak, even in the
>>wind? Why not downwind, human?
>
> as the instructions state, you hold the probe below the suspected leak point
> because the engineers (those guys whom you seem to worship so) have
> determined that refrigerant falls due to its weight. just as i told you.

And since your booklet doesn't tell you this,
you don't know enough to hold the probe
both under and *downwind* of the leak?
__
Steve

: )

..

 

Who is Jeff Gannon?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Is he stranger than Jeff Gannon?
>
> : )
> __
> Steve
> .

 

Who is Jeff Gannon?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Is he stranger than Jeff Gannon?
>
> : )
> __
> Steve
> .

 

Who is Jeff Gannon?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Is he stranger than Jeff Gannon?
>
> : )
> __
> Steve
> .