'08 Liberty Specs
Guest
Posts: n/a
'08 Liberty Specs
A friend is looking at an '08 Liberty with the P/T selectrac case and 6-sp
manual. We are both curious what type of axle is standard? D44? (OK, stop
laughing.) D30? (More than likely.) We both know that the IFS isn't suited
well for serious off-roading; mud and snow is all she anticipates. How strong
is the IFS on this model?
manual. We are both curious what type of axle is standard? D44? (OK, stop
laughing.) D30? (More than likely.) We both know that the IFS isn't suited
well for serious off-roading; mud and snow is all she anticipates. How strong
is the IFS on this model?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
> off-roading
You both know wrong then.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
> off-roading
You both know wrong then.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
> off-roading
You both know wrong then.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
> off-roading
You both know wrong then.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
> off-roading
You both know wrong then.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
> off-roading
You both know wrong then.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
XS11E wrote:
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>
>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>> off-roading
>
> You both know wrong then.
You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to
offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long,
but very distinguished.
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>
>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>> off-roading
>
> You both know wrong then.
You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to
offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long,
but very distinguished.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
XS11E wrote:
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>
>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>> off-roading
>
> You both know wrong then.
You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to
offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long,
but very distinguished.
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>
>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>> off-roading
>
> You both know wrong then.
You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to
offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long,
but very distinguished.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
XS11E wrote:
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>
>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>> off-roading
>
> You both know wrong then.
You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to
offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long,
but very distinguished.
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>
>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>> off-roading
>
> You both know wrong then.
You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to
offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long,
but very distinguished.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> XS11E wrote:
>
>> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>>> off-roading
>>
>> You both know wrong then.
>
> You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
>
> Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very
> little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to
> killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished.
How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"?
And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in
case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for
serious off roading."
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
> XS11E wrote:
>
>> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>>> off-roading
>>
>> You both know wrong then.
>
> You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
>
> Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very
> little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to
> killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished.
How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"?
And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in
case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for
serious off roading."
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> XS11E wrote:
>
>> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>>> off-roading
>>
>> You both know wrong then.
>
> You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
>
> Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very
> little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to
> killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished.
How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"?
And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in
case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for
serious off roading."
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
> XS11E wrote:
>
>> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>>> off-roading
>>
>> You both know wrong then.
>
> You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
>
> Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very
> little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to
> killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished.
How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"?
And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in
case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for
serious off roading."
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> XS11E wrote:
>
>> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>>> off-roading
>>
>> You both know wrong then.
>
> You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
>
> Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very
> little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to
> killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished.
How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"?
And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in
case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for
serious off roading."
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
> XS11E wrote:
>
>> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious
>>> off-roading
>>
>> You both know wrong then.
>
> You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions.
>
> Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very
> little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to
> killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished.
How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"?
And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in
case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for
serious off roading."
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org
