'08 Liberty Specs
A friend is looking at an '08 Liberty with the P/T selectrac case and 6-sp
manual. We are both curious what type of axle is standard? D44? (OK, stop laughing.) D30? (More than likely.) We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious off-roading; mud and snow is all she anticipates. How strong is the IFS on this model? |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious > off-roading You both know wrong then. -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious > off-roading You both know wrong then. -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious > off-roading You both know wrong then. -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
XS11E wrote:
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote: > >> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious >> off-roading > > You both know wrong then. You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions. Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished. |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
XS11E wrote:
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote: > >> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious >> off-roading > > You both know wrong then. You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions. Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished. |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
XS11E wrote:
> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote: > >> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious >> off-roading > > You both know wrong then. You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions. Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished. |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> XS11E wrote: > >> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote: >> >>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious >>> off-roading >> >> You both know wrong then. > > You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions. > > Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very > little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to > killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished. How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"? And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for serious off roading." -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> XS11E wrote: > >> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote: >> >>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious >>> off-roading >> >> You both know wrong then. > > You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions. > > Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very > little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to > killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished. How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"? And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for serious off roading." -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Re: '08 Liberty Specs
JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote:
> XS11E wrote: > >> JD Adams <FakeAddress@softcom.net> wrote: >> >>> We both know that the IFS isn't suited well for serious >>> off-roading >> >> You both know wrong then. > > You are off-topic, and I'm not interested in negative opinions. > > Hmmm. After checking your past posts, I find that you have very > little to offer this group, so I'm going to add you to > killfile-heap. The list is long, but very distinguished. How is correcting a false belief "off-topic"? And, FWIW, I just offered the group a bit of important information in case there's anyone else who believes that "IFS isn't suited well for serious off roading." -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands