[OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
04-11-2004, 09:36 PM
#521
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
04-12-2004, 06:22 AM
#522
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Fritzinger wrote:
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
04-12-2004, 06:22 AM
#523
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Fritzinger wrote:
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
04-12-2004, 06:22 AM
#524
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Fritzinger wrote:
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
04-12-2004, 06:22 AM
#525
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Fritzinger wrote:
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||
|||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||
||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
||| back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||
|| You soft poof.
|
| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
| banned.
It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_ society,
along with rapists and child molesters.
Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and getting
normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by raping them. This
seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion that everyone is
actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement. ******* also tend to make
accusations towards anyone's sexuality who has attacked gays. For some
reason they think it's a viable getout clause.
Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------ filth was
to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not acceptable and
clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the head. For this reason
we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in the head but I digress.
Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes because they
are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live. A ------ has no use
in society and is a lot more destructive than a fox or a seal. ******* smell
funny and commit unnatural, indecent acts, surely those two facts alone are
enough to convince good people to cull all *******. It would be a good
experiment to destroy all gay material and to rid the entire planet of
everyone and everything gay and then see if new ******* get born. However
since we could never prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the
first place the results would not be sound.
As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done this for
many thousands of years.
Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the ****** or
all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable targets for a
cull.
Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
first.
Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to the
list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority which is
ripe for a cull is the ------.
|
| Idiot!
You mean realist, no?
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
04-12-2004, 09:44 AM
#526
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
04-12-2004, 09:44 AM
#527
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
04-12-2004, 09:44 AM
#528
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
04-12-2004, 09:44 AM
#529
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
news:jk4k705646ngmjp70h6a6b7bv8lgo7sffk@4ax.com:
> Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:59:08 -0400, a stranger
> called by some "Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
>>Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's
>>when gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born
>>that way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there
>>was no choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this
>>position led to the transvestite and --- change operations. And about
>>the Bible positions, I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well
>>as biological facts --- hard to argue with human anatomy.
>
> OK, first of all, the first --- change operation took place in 1930,
> on a Danish artist. Einar Wegener became Lily Elbe.
>
> I know pwoplw who got together in the fifties, and they always knew
> that they were gay, or really a woman in a man's body, or whatever. I
> myself knew I was attracted to both women and men by the age of 8.
You're just another social deviant. Boys at that age still think girls have
cooties and aren't thinking about who they are sexually attracted to.
> About anatomy.. why are there nerve endings inside the rectum?
> *Something* is supposed to stimulate them...
Not your --------- boyfriend's ----.
04-12-2004, 10:57 AM
#530
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
> Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
> stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
> >Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com :
>
> >> No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> >> mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> >> on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
> >
> >Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
>
> It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
> fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
>
> Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
> married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you can
> marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
> specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
> marriage?
I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.
End of story really.
> Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
> stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
> >Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com :
>
> >> No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> >> mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> >> on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
> >
> >Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
>
> It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
> fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
>
> Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
> married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you can
> marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
> specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
> marriage?
I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.
End of story really.
