[OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
#511
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <lChec.966$2Z6.95449@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's when
> gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born that
> way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there was no
> choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this position led to
> the transvestite and --- change operations. And about the Bible positions,
> I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well as biological facts ---
> hard to argue with human anatomy.
That's an interesting interpretation of what's going on. I'm not sure
exactly what transvestism or transsexualism has to do with
homosexuality. Other than being lumped together all the time, the things
are really not that much alike. I'm gay. That means I like men. But I
don't dress is women's clothing and I don't want to become a woman.
Bible facts? Hah! The Bible contains no facts on biology -- or on
anything relating to science. The closest the Bible comes to stating
"facts" is rules for the sanitary preparation of food, and Christians by
and large don't keep Kosher, so that's out the window.
You didn't state any biological facts either. Opinions, yes. But
opinions are like asses: only well-formed ones should be displayed in
public.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
"Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's when
> gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born that
> way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there was no
> choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this position led to
> the transvestite and --- change operations. And about the Bible positions,
> I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well as biological facts ---
> hard to argue with human anatomy.
That's an interesting interpretation of what's going on. I'm not sure
exactly what transvestism or transsexualism has to do with
homosexuality. Other than being lumped together all the time, the things
are really not that much alike. I'm gay. That means I like men. But I
don't dress is women's clothing and I don't want to become a woman.
Bible facts? Hah! The Bible contains no facts on biology -- or on
anything relating to science. The closest the Bible comes to stating
"facts" is rules for the sanitary preparation of food, and Christians by
and large don't keep Kosher, so that's out the window.
You didn't state any biological facts either. Opinions, yes. But
opinions are like asses: only well-formed ones should be displayed in
public.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
#512
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <lChec.966$2Z6.95449@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's when
> gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born that
> way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there was no
> choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this position led to
> the transvestite and --- change operations. And about the Bible positions,
> I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well as biological facts ---
> hard to argue with human anatomy.
That's an interesting interpretation of what's going on. I'm not sure
exactly what transvestism or transsexualism has to do with
homosexuality. Other than being lumped together all the time, the things
are really not that much alike. I'm gay. That means I like men. But I
don't dress is women's clothing and I don't want to become a woman.
Bible facts? Hah! The Bible contains no facts on biology -- or on
anything relating to science. The closest the Bible comes to stating
"facts" is rules for the sanitary preparation of food, and Christians by
and large don't keep Kosher, so that's out the window.
You didn't state any biological facts either. Opinions, yes. But
opinions are like asses: only well-formed ones should be displayed in
public.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
"Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's when
> gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born that
> way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there was no
> choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this position led to
> the transvestite and --- change operations. And about the Bible positions,
> I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well as biological facts ---
> hard to argue with human anatomy.
That's an interesting interpretation of what's going on. I'm not sure
exactly what transvestism or transsexualism has to do with
homosexuality. Other than being lumped together all the time, the things
are really not that much alike. I'm gay. That means I like men. But I
don't dress is women's clothing and I don't want to become a woman.
Bible facts? Hah! The Bible contains no facts on biology -- or on
anything relating to science. The closest the Bible comes to stating
"facts" is rules for the sanitary preparation of food, and Christians by
and large don't keep Kosher, so that's out the window.
You didn't state any biological facts either. Opinions, yes. But
opinions are like asses: only well-formed ones should be displayed in
public.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
#513
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <lChec.966$2Z6.95449@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's when
> gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born that
> way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there was no
> choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this position led to
> the transvestite and --- change operations. And about the Bible positions,
> I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well as biological facts ---
> hard to argue with human anatomy.
That's an interesting interpretation of what's going on. I'm not sure
exactly what transvestism or transsexualism has to do with
homosexuality. Other than being lumped together all the time, the things
are really not that much alike. I'm gay. That means I like men. But I
don't dress is women's clothing and I don't want to become a woman.
Bible facts? Hah! The Bible contains no facts on biology -- or on
anything relating to science. The closest the Bible comes to stating
"facts" is rules for the sanitary preparation of food, and Christians by
and large don't keep Kosher, so that's out the window.
You didn't state any biological facts either. Opinions, yes. But
opinions are like asses: only well-formed ones should be displayed in
public.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
"Mmhsb" <mymariashsb@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Please back up isn't required it's common knowledge that in the 70's when
> gays started coming out the vast majority maintained they were born that
> way, i.e.. a man in a woman's body or vice versa. Or claimed there was no
> choice in the matter as they developed that way. Then this position led to
> the transvestite and --- change operations. And about the Bible positions,
> I'm not judging, simply stated Bible facts as well as biological facts ---
> hard to argue with human anatomy.
That's an interesting interpretation of what's going on. I'm not sure
exactly what transvestism or transsexualism has to do with
homosexuality. Other than being lumped together all the time, the things
are really not that much alike. I'm gay. That means I like men. But I
don't dress is women's clothing and I don't want to become a woman.
Bible facts? Hah! The Bible contains no facts on biology -- or on
anything relating to science. The closest the Bible comes to stating
"facts" is rules for the sanitary preparation of food, and Christians by
and large don't keep Kosher, so that's out the window.
You didn't state any biological facts either. Opinions, yes. But
opinions are like asses: only well-formed ones should be displayed in
public.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
#514
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
#515
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
#516
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
#517
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
>>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>
>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
And your total--------- statement is based on what.
#518
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
#519
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
#520
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger
"Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> || The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
> |
> | Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
> | back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>
> You soft poof.
Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
banned.
Idiot!
--
Dave Fritzinger