[jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0405311821180.3717@panix1.panix .com...
> On Mon, 31 May 2004, F. Robert Falbo wrote:
>
> >
> > > I don't care if Benz $#!ts a golden egg with this 320 CDI, you'll
never
> > > get Americans to buy diesels again in large numbers.
> >
> > Get Gasoline up to $3/Gal and people will flock to Diesels.
>
> Maybe, maybe not. For the past two winter seasons here in chilly New
> England the per gallon price of diesel fuel has been higher than mid-grade
> gasoline, and occasionally higher than premium. The reason given is that
> home heating oil and diesel are closely related products and that higher
> demand in one causes higher prices in the other.
>
Some nuts out here in the Southwest are running "bio-diesel" which is some
form of distilation of cow $#!t, corn oil and burger grease....PLEASE! Just
buy your gas and shut the f&^% UP!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:55:38 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:55:38 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:55:38 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:55:38 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> I tow my Jeep everywhere, and I noticed my Bronco gets the same
>fuel mileage, with or with out it. So why don't you try your diesel?
>Remember that little Volkswagen pick up? <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
Bill, you usually make sense, but have obviously breathed
too many gasoline fumes! Tow 5,000 - 6,000 extra pounds and
still get the same mileage? Give us a break.
FWIW, I have a 1997 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with a 6.5 turbo-diesel,
I get around 18 mpg in the city, (when I tow the YJ, it drops a couple
of MPG) if I had a gasser, it'd probably be closer to 11 mpg, AND the
diesel fuel is 40 - 50 cents per gallon cheaper than regular gas.
Oh yeah, I've got around 145,000 miles, just getting broken in good
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:40:23 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:40:23 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:40:23 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:40:23 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
>California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
>standards are the strictest:
>http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
either, if they went thru the same test today.
Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
part, quiet.
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [jeep2diesel] Deisel Jeep Conversions
"Tookie " <tookie_nospam@***.net> wrote in message
news:40bcb3c0.1262751921@news.east.***.net...
> On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:40:23 -0700, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=)
> ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan is too dirty to be sold in
> >California, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine, where emissions
> >standards are the strictest:
> >http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specia...8/article.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>
> I don't think any car manufactured over 10 years ago would pass
> either, if they went thru the same test today.
> Most of the US diesels pollution problems are related to poor
> fuel quality - what we have available would be considered
> trash in Europe, where diesels run clean and, for the most
> part, quiet.
Another fable. Old rat diesels are slow-lane choking the roads of Europe,
belching the same black spew we see over here. EU countries just have a
lower sulphur content in all their fuels, which reduces the stink a bit.
> Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
> 88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
> PosiLock, 4.10s
